1968 Council on Evangelism Case Study Discussion
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
1968 Council on Evangelism Case Study Discussion
Historical Perspectives on Pentecostal Missionaries 41
human history, motivated by love for Christ and obedience to the great commission, still remains at the heart of the movement The challenge of communicating the gospel to the unreached millions still enlists a steady number of missionary candidates. At the 1968 Council on Evangelism, a special gathering called to address the world mission of the Assemblies of God, a new song was introduced entitled “Our Mission.” Yet today its lyrics reflect the heartbeat of the largest sector of classical Pentecostalism. Verse four and the chorus read:
Christ only is our message; He died, He lives again. Ascended, soon returning, To rule the hearts of men. Constrained by love eternal, Can we whose hearts are stirred, Endued with mighty power, Withhold the Living Word?
Til the world shall hear. Bound in sin and fear. Our mission never ending, Til the world shall hear. (Zilch 1969:267-268)
Most Pentecostal missionaries, both past and present, including those who have suffered and those who have not, would probably join in the singing and clap their hands.
Notes l.This study is dedicated to the memory of the late Morris O. Williams
(1920-1991), an Assemblies of God missionary, field director for Africa, missiologist, and mentor. His passionate belief in indigenous church principles and the distribu- tion of the Spirit’s gifts in the universal church led him to champion the concept of partnership in mission between the sending agency and the national mission churches. He died on 8 June 1991, shortly before he was scheduled to preach a sermon on heaven.
- All Bible quotations are taken from the New International Version (NIV). 3. The “Foursquare Gospel” refers to salvation, baptism in the Holy Spirit, divine
healing, and the second coming of Christ, considered to be the four pillars of Pentecostal teaching. This formulation has been more widely known as the “full gospel,” tracing its origin to the Holiness Movement For more information, see Donald W. Dayton, (1987).
- The cautious change in attitude toward Roman Catholics by Melvin L. Hodges, as evidenced in his A Theology of the Church audits Mission (1977), occurred after the emergence of the Catholic charismatic renewal, more positive assessments by evangelicals, and Hodges’ own participation in the local Assemblies of God/Roman Catholic Dialogue conducted in Springfield, Missouri.
- For more information, see F. P. Möller, (n.d.); cf., A Relevant Pentecostal Witness (1988); Frank Chikane, (1988).
References Cited Benson, Alan
n.d. A “Guest” of the Japanese Military. Inglewood, CA Calvary Assembly. 1953 “The Revival in North China.” Pentecostal Evangel (October 16): 11.
42 Gary Β. McGee
Booze, Joyce Wells, ed. 1990 Heroes of the Faith. Springfield, MO: Assemblies of God Division of Foreign
Missions. Brother Andrew
1979 “Mission: The Church Under Attack in Zimbabwe-Rhodesia.” Logos (Sep- tember/October):45-46, 48.
Campbell, Joseph E. 1951 The Pentecostal Holiness Church: 1898-1948. Franklin Springs, GA: Publishing
House of the Pentecostal Holiness Church. Chikane, Frank
1988 No Life of My Own: An Autobiography. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books. Correli, Norm
1989 “Out to Change the World?” Mountain Movers (April): 10-11. Dayton, Donald W.
1987 Theological Roots of Pentecostalism. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press. Durasoff, Steve
1972 Bright Wind of the Spirit: Pentecostalism Today. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pren tice-Hall.
Frodsham, Stanley H. n.d. Wholly for God. Springfield, MO: Gospel Publishing House.
Hodges, Melvin L. 1957 “Harvest Is Passing.” In Melodies of Praise. Edwin P. Anderson, ed. P. 147.
Springfield, MO: Gospel Publishing House. 1977 A Theology of the Church and Its Mission. Springfield, MO: Gospel Publishing
House. Howell, Beth Prim
1960 Lady on a Donkey. New York: E. P. Dutton and Co. Interim
1988 A Relevant Pentecostal Witness. Chatsglen, Durban, R S Α.: Interim committee of Relevant Pentecostal Witness.
Jenney, Timothy P. 1980 “The Nazi Persecution of Pentecostal Churches in Germany, 1933-1945.”
M A thesis, Southwest Missouri State University. Johnson, Leland E.
- 1946 / Was a Prisoner of the Japs. Los Angeles, CA: Private printing. Juergensen, Marie
1985 “Ministering to Japanese-Americans in the Northwest.” Assemblies of God Heritage 5 (Spring): 7, 12-13.
Kiúbeck, G. Gloria 1958 What God Hath Wrought: A History of the Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada.
Toronto, Ontario: Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada. Lauster, Bobbie.
1967 Herman Lauster. Cleveland, TN: Pathway Press. McGee, Gary B.
1983 “Early Pentecostal Missionaries.” Assemblies of God Heritage 3 (2):6-7. McKinney, H. C.
1957 “The Vision.” In Melodies of Praise. Edwin P. Anderson, ed. P. 265. Spring- field, MO: Gospel Publishing House.
McPherson, Aimee Semple 1940 “Preach the Word.” In Foursquare Hymnal of Standard Songs of Evangelism.
Los Angeles, CA: Aimee Semple McPherson Publishing Co.
Historical Perspectives on Pentecostal Missionaries 43
Mitchell, Robert Bryant 1982 Heritage arid Horizons. Des Moines, I A Open Bible Publishers.
Möllers, F. P., Sr. n.d. Church and Politics. A Pentecostal View of the South African Situation.
Bramfontein, South Africa: Gospel Publishers. Myland, D. Wesley
1906 “The Latter Rain.” In ” The Latter Rain’ Song.” Bread of Life (November 1981): 16.
Open Bible Standard Churches 1951 “Severe Persecutions in Colombia.” Message of the Open Bible (March):8-9.
Sahlberg, Carl-Erik 1985 The Pentecostal Movement·—Five Case Studies. Nairobi, Kenya: Evangel Pub-
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!