Community Based Participatory Research Assignment Discussion
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Community Based Participatory Research Assignment Discussion
Please note that each and every assignment has its own word limit.
Community-based participatory research (CBPR), is a partnership involving the community, community members, academic research and organizations approach to research. An example of the CBPR is the issues of diabetes in the Native American communities. Diabetes is a cardiovascular disease that occurs when blood glucose is too high. Diabetes affects more than 30 million Americans and is prevalent in people who are overweight and lack physical activity, and smoke. Due to health disparities, the Native Americans experience a disproportionate prevalence of diabetes with an incidence rate of 2.6 times more than other ethnicities. CBPR is used as a collaborative approach to research the health disparity issues by involving partners in research that can identify and processing factors associated with the issues and implement health intervention (Center from Disease Control and Prevention, 2019; Jernigan, 2010).
The intervention within the article was based on the Santa Clara Valley diabetes community action project (DCAP). The interventions were opening a clinic for the community whose goal was to strengthen community relationships and build trust and improve the management of diabetes. Additionally, a community forum on diabetes was created and information was distributed through a flyer that contained health fairs, community social and cultural gatherings. The events allowed the community to share dialogues and their opinions on health needs within the community. Healthy foods were provided at events to promote healthy eating. A diabetes support program was created to help the community manage their diabetes. A challenge to the intervention was that the Indian health center clinic was created for the Native Americans because of the high diabetes rate concerns. However, the clinic was taken over by predominately low-income Hispanics, where less than 30% of Native Americans were utilizing the clinic. However, this situation is a success because Hispanics are a community that has a high incidence rate in diabetes, and it is good that they have access to this clinic, which deemed the intervention a success (Minkler & Wallerstein, 2003; Jernigan, 2010).
The benefit of using the approach is it promotes community collaboration among the community members and healthcare members by building trust. The interventions were successful in engaging the community through different modes of interaction, education, and social change. Also, because of the effectiveness of the clinic, it became open to everyone as a low-income clinic. The clinic also became a culturally safe haven for the Native Americans because of the lack of cultural or community centers for the population (Jernigan, 2010). This approach could be used on obesity, with the same structure including cultural aspects to engage the diverse communities in participating in healthy events, such as support programs and low-income clinics that focus on the management of obesity, which will prevent co-morbidities, such as diabetes.
Reference
Center from Disease Control and Prevention. (2019). CDC works to prevent type 2 diabetes and improve the health of all people with diabetes. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/resources/publications/factsheets/diabetes-prediabetes.htm
Jernigan, B.B.V. (2010). Community-Based Participatory Research With Native American Communities: The Chronic Disease Self-Management Program. Health Promotion Practice, 11(6), 888-899. Doi: 10.1177/1524839909333374.
Minkler, M.; Wallerstein, N. Community based participatory research for health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2003
Respond to the BOLD paragraph ABOVE by using one of the option below… in APA format with At least two references and a minimum of 200 words….. .(The List of References should not be older than 2016 and should not be included in the word count.)
Ask a probing question.
Share an insight from having read your colleague’s posting.
Offer and support an opinion.
Validate an idea with your own experience.
Make a suggestion.
Expand on your colleague’s posting.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!