Simulator for Training and Readiness Essay
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Simulator for Training and Readiness Essay
Simulator, Training, Readiness, Essay
A simulation exercise is a completely simulated, collaborating activity that examinations the ability of a company or other entity to react to a simulated crisis, tragedy, or catastrophe. This exercise is generally carried out as field exercises and comprises a situation that is as close to realism as possible. Control of a simulator could help in the improvement of fineness or quality of retaliation to contingencies (Neelamkavil, F. 2015).
To start with, having a simulator would give almost a first-hand experience to responders to contingencies. “First hand” skills implies that a single or more event during the training, the user has ever encountered such an issue. This calls for quick reference and application of the historical events that occurred during the training session and apply as fast as possible to be accurate and save time.
This appears to be different from the people who have never gone through the simulation environment hence resulting in the panic and cause chaos while trying to look for a solution from every part within an organization. To add on, however much the situation might be complex, it will not require an extra group of people to abandon their duties so that they can try to solve an issue that has occurred, instead only few would be delegated to take care of the problem while the rest of the staffs can proceed with service delivery (NCJRS. 2008).
Secondly, through simulation, the entire response team gets to understand that their roles and how to execute them by performing repetitive simulations to correct on issues that have been identified in the previous test for perfection.
Hence ensuring that during a real scenario, the team will be in a position to execute their roles effectively and in an efficient manner. To add on, the simulator helps in reducing causalities in a real scenario since the responders have adequate experience in handling tools and equipment’s that era used when responding to the disaster (NCJRS. 2008).
Thirdly, simulators are usually in a position of providing a collaborating technique for responders to get to study methods and what things might have been performed in a better way or what actions deteriorated the condition. As a result of this, this is going to be documented to better the response guidelines and procedures.
In real case situations, the mastered procedures shall be used to ensure the disaster is responded to in the most ideal manner. More so, the documented results from a real case situation will serve as a rich source of reference to the newly recruited staff despite having gone through the simulation test hence the staff will have double reference points (NCJRS. 2008).
Finally, simulations act as the main tool for setting the recovery time objectives and recovery point objective. Further, it assists a company or a firm to predict how much damage it would incur in case of a disaster. This information is adequate to assist the management in decision making on what vital services or equipment to ensure and against what kind of a disaster (NCJRS. 2008).
In conclusion, is regarded to be very vital to each company or organization towards improving the response of the real case scenario. It is at present applied for several functions in the Section of Protection, particularly for user training on novel programs and to assist in backing quarrels existing in the investigation of choices (previously operational and cost efficiency analyses) to validate proceeding with development of the system.
Its achievement in comparable uses in manufacturing, and its safety, cost, and environmental gains over-functioning analysis has raised curiosity in the application of simulation in the operational evaluation and testing (Manuel, L. 2016).
References
Manuel, L. (2016). Business process modeling, simulation, and design. Pearson Education India.
NCJRS. (2008, October). Computer Simulation for Incident Command Exercises. National Criminal Justice Reference Service | NCJRS. https://www.ncjrs.gov/app/publications/Abstract.aspx?id=246582
Neelamkavil, F. (2015). Computer simulation and modeling. John Wiley & Sons.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!