Portfolio Project Operations Management Assessment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
QUESTION 2
The final Portfolio Project is structured to help demonstrate your understanding of the course material, as well as the implications of new knowledge gained from outside research. The subject organization may be your workplace, an organization that you are familiar with, or an organization discovered in your research. Information about the subject organization must be publicly available and properly referenced in your work. As part of the initial Portfolio Project Milestone due in Module 4, you must secure instructor approval for the organization selected for your Portfolio Project.
Based on your analysis, you will write an assessment about the subject organization’s OM strategy and practices. When writing the assessment, assume the role of a highly regarded operations management professional commissioned to review, analyze, and describe the organization’s OM for achieving increased sustainable business value. Your assessment should address the following key elements:
1. Subject Organization: Name and briefly describe the subject organization in this section, including its mission. In this section, at least one in-text citation must refer to a source in your reference list that can be accessed by the reader to learn more details about this organization.
2. Operations Management: Define OM and relate the subject organization’s mission, operational strategy, and productivity measurements; compare and contrast OM with project management.
3. OM Forecasting: Define forecasting in the context of OM; identify the subject organization’s forecasting methods and practices; relate the Seven Steps in the forecasting system to the subject organization; highlight potential ethical considerations related to the subject organization’s forecasting; recap applicable lessons learned based on your Forecasting Simulation experience and describe how they apply to your subject organization.
4. Define Operations: Define design of goods and services and relate to the subject organization; highlight OM process, location, and human resource strategy in the context of subject organization.
5. Quality Management: Define quality and identify common OM quality management best practices; identify the subject organization’s quality management methodology; recap applicable lessons learned based on your Quality Management Simulation experience and describe how they apply to your subject organization.
6. Supply Chain Management: Define supply chain management (SCM); designate the subject organization’s SCM strategy and explain the basis for determination; describe the subject organization’s use of technology for SCM; identify potential SCM risks and SCM ethical considerations related to the subject organization; recap applicable lessons learned in your Supply Chain Management Simulation experience and describe how they apply to your subject organization.
7. Inventory Management: Define inventory management, its importance, and common inventory models; identify the subject organization’s inventory management practices; identify potential ethical considerations related to the subject organization; recap applicable lessons learned in your Inventory Management Simulation experience and describe how they apply to your subject organization.
8. Aggregate Planning: Define sales and operations planning (SOP) and relate to the subject organization; define materials resource planning (MRP) and enterprise resource planning (ERP) and relate to the subject organization; describe the subject organization’s use of technology for aggregate planning.
9. Lean Operations: Define lean operations; identify the subject organization’s lean operations practices; relate strategic importance of maintenance and reliability to the subject organization; identify an OM innovation to improve the subject organization’s operations for competitive advantage.
10. OM Information Technology: Describe the role of information technology in operations management. Describe three technology Innovations that has significantly transformed operation management practices.
Submit your Portfolio Project paper as a single Microsoft Word document to the Module 8 submissions area established for this purpose.
Your essay should address the following requirements:
· Your well-written OM assessment essay thesis should be 12-15 pages in length, which does not include the title, reference, of appendix pages.
· Include a title and a reference page.
· In addition to your course text book, cite at least six current scholarly resources to support your assertions and conclusions.
· Include an appendix for tables and figures.
Please write clearly, concisely, and cohesively; use section level headers to organize the key elements of your thesis.
QUESTION 1
Common Portfolio Project Milestone Requirements
Having selected the subject organization for your Portfolio Project Operations Management (OM) Assessment, create an initial draft of the Portfolio Project paper based on the key elements stipulated in the Module 8 Portfolio Project requirements. For this Portfolio Project Milestone, include a title page, an introduction, and a reference page with at least two current scholarly references (published within the past five years) in addition to the course text book. For your initial Portfolio Project paper draft include substantive content for the following sections:
1. The entire Subject Organization section
2. The entire Operations Management section
3. The entire OM Forecasting section
4. The entire Define Operations section.
For all other Portfolio Project requirements, merely include the required key elements (and sub-element items) as appropriately APA formatted section level headers as placeholders for content to be subsequently added to your final Portfolio Project paper due in week 8.
Additionally, your Portfolio Project Milestone paper should address the following requirements:
· Your well-written OM assessment essay thesis should be 5-7 pages in length (beyond the title, reference, of appendix pages).
· Format your paper, which includes an introduction and conclusion. Note: a conclusion section is not required for your draft paper.
· Include a title and a reference page.
· In addition to your course text book, cite at least two current scholarly resources to support your assertions and conclusions.
· Include an appendix for tables and figures.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!