Woodrow Wilson Bridge Project Evaluation and Analysis
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Woodrow Wilson Bridge Project Evaluation and Analysis
Inputs
Project Management Plan
A project management plan was drawn to highlight the procurement requirement and the time over which the project should be completed. It set out the two main objectives for constructing the bridge to construct a two drawbridges side by side and four interchanges that are adjacent. The funds required for the project were determined as $1.581 billion with the sources identified (“Woodrow Wilson Bridge, Potomac River, Maryland, Virginia”, 2018).
Requirements Documentation
The details of each contract that was to be awarded in the construction of the bridge were documented. The details documented included a description of the requirements of the all the contracts awarded, their estimated costs, the status of the contract as at the contract signing and continuous updates and the estimated duration over which the contract was expected to be completed (“Woodrow Wilson Bridge, Potomac River, Maryland, Virginia”, 2018).
Risk Register
The project plan did not identify any plans. However, large projects like these are associated with budgeting risks. The budgets estimates may not be able to fund the project to its completion which may distract project work. With the project also managed by a two-tier team, it was prone to conflict risks between the two teams (“Woodrow Wilson-Bridge – Construction”, n.d).
Activity Resource Requirements
This analyzes all resources and quantities required in the project. The area of coverage by the bridge was determined as 7.5 miles. Each of the four approach spans was allocated funds that would enable the contractors to acquire all requirements. Due to the large amount of work, the project was split into sub-projects and assigned to different contractors (“Woodrow Wilson-Bridge – Construction”, n.d).
Project Schedule
All projects are designed to start on determined date and end after a given duration. The Woodrow Wilson-Bridge was scheduled to begin in the year 2000 upon which each phase was allocated its own time of completion. A successive phase would start after the completion of the contract. This was emphasized since a delay in one would affect the whole project plan as it was designed (“Woodrow Wilson-Bridge – Construction”, n.d).
Activity Cost Estimates
The project team was mandated to provide an estimated figure for every contract within the project. All costs were estimated according to the requirements of the bridge authority. The estimates were then accumulated to arrive at the total estimate for the whole project. The costs estimates were therefore controlled to ensure that they were not higher than expected.
Stakeholder Register
The stakeholder registers in project management documents the details of all the people, organizations and groups that have an interest in the project. The Woodrow Wilson-Bridge project authority identified the public user needs of a more efficient bridge. It also identified the government agencies that funded the project such as the state Department of Transport, Federal Highway Administration, Maryland State Highway Administration and the District of Columbia Department of Public Works (“Woodrow Wilson-Bridge – Construction”, n.d).
Enterprise Environmental Factors
These refer to either external or internal environmental issues that may affect the success of the project. The Woodrow Wilson-Bridge project was influenced by external factors such as government regulations which required the contracts awarded to be regulated by the procurement laws of the state. It was also influenced by economic factors since some contractors would quote high amounts in their bids which at some point delayed the project for six months (“Woodrow Wilson Bridge, Potomac River, Maryland, Virginia”, 2018).
Organizational Process Assets
The plans, policies, knowledge bases, processes and procedures used in carrying out a project are process assets. The project was controlled by procedures and policies that were designed by the Woodrow Wilson-Bridge project coordination committee which was led by the FHWA. One of the procedures was the procurement method used in the project which was purely competitive bidding (“Woodrow Wilson-Bridge – Construction”, n.d).
Tools and Techniques
Make-or-Buy Analysis
Outsourcing is best preferred when an organization is not able to provide the facilities required or cannot produce commodities that meet the required quality. In the case of Woodrow Wilson Bridge, the interagency committed settled for the buy decision. As it can be seen, the committee mandated with the construction of the bridge used invited several contractors who did the construction from start to completion. This was the best decision due to the complexity of the project (“Woodrow Wilson Bridge, Potomac River, Maryland, Virginia”, 2018).
Expert judgment
The construction coordination committee depended on an expert judgment from consultants and other federal agencies such as the American Automobile Association, the Transport Regulations Board. Their judgments on the project execution were incorporated in the management of the project ensure that it was a viable project. Expert judgment helps in making sound decisions that cool down concerns from project stakeholders (“Case Study – Woodrow Wilson-Bridge in Maryland and Virginia, n.d).
Market Research
The Federal Highway Administration which led the project coordination committee began to research on the viability of the project. The Transport Research Board helped in determining the suitability of the project. It is through this research that it was discovered that the old bridge did not meet the transport needs hence an expansion was necessary thus recommended the project (“Case Study – Woodrow Wilson-Bridge in Maryland and Virginia, n.d).
Meetings
It was the role of the Federal Highway Administration to organize meetings before the project started and during the execution period. The project was managed by a two-tier committee which comprised of the financiers, contractors and special stakeholders. During the meetings, the challenges and updates on the construction will be discussed with the contractors reporting the progress of their work (“Case Study – Woodrow Wilson-Bridge in Maryland and Virginia, n.d).
Outputs
Procurement Management Plan
A procurement management plan provides guidelines on how processes, procedures, resources and people will be put into work to execute the project. It was stipulated that once the constructor was awarded the contract, they were to apply their resources to execute the contract as agreed and within the allocated period. All costs in the project were supposed to be within the procurement regulations (Schweitzer & Stephenson, 2015).
Procurement Statement of Work
The project was split into phases and awarded to different constructors. Each contract entailed its specific work that was to be completed. Constructors were, therefore, to carry out the portions of work as it was specified in their contract agreements. The procurement statement of work was developed by the project coordinating committee, and they would evaluate each contract as the statement indicated (Schweitzer & Stephenson, 2015).
Procurement Documents
Every contract entered into must have procurement documents as proof of the agreements made. Since Woodrow Wilson-Bridge project was complex, documentation was highly significant. All agreements and payments made were recorded the Federal Highway Administration providing custody of the documents. The documentation started from advertisements of the contract until the completion agreement (Schweitzer & Stephenson, 2015).
Source Selection Criteria
The source selection criteria identified the attributes that the constructors were supposed to have before bidding for the contract. These attributes were contained in the procurement documents thus the constructors would examine their resources and facilities and establish whether they were able to meet the contract needs. Special needs such as the use of special materials like steel are also addressed here.
Make-or-buy decisions
The decision to make or buy decision for the project was determined by the complexity of the project. The Federal Highway Administration made the buy decision when they decided to use competitive bidding to award the contracts. The coordinating committee after awarding the contract had no business with knowing the decisions made by the constructors as long as they had agreed to deliver the work as expected.
Change Requests
A change request is used by the parties in a contract to call for an adjustment in the processes, resources or materials used in the executing the work. One of the notable change requests was made to change from using steel box girders to use steel plate girders. This happened during the contract thus an agreement was to be made between the contractor and the procuring entity (“Woodrow Wilson-Bridge, Potomac River, Maryland, Virginia”, 2018).
Project Documents Updates
Updates to project documents are done from time to time during the execution period. These updates ensure that the project progress is verifiable since they record what portion of work is completed. Updates in the Woodrow Wilson Project must have been given although it cannot be determined through the available information (“Woodrow Wilson-Bridge, Potomac River, Maryland, Virginia”, 2018).
Reference
Case Study – Woodrow Wilson-Bridge in Maryland and Virginia. (n.d) – Transport Research Board. Retrieved October 4, 2018, from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2_CS_C01_WilsonBridge.pdf . (Pdf file).
Schweitzer, L., & Stephenson, M. (2015). Planning, Development, and Media. Journal of Planning Education and Research,36(2), 239-254. doi:10.1177/0739456×15620280.
Woodrow Wilson-Bridge – Construction. (n.d). Retrieved October 4, 2018, from http://capital-beltway.com/Woodrow-Wilson-Bridge-Const.html#LATEST_UPDATE .
Woodrow Wilson Bridge, Potomac River, Maryland, Virginia. (2018). Retrieved October 4, 2018, from https://www.roadtraffic-technology.com/projects/woodrow_wilson/ .
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!