Vamik Volkan article on Chosen and Historical Trauma
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Vamik Volkan article on Chosen and Historical Trauma
Unit Two – TO DO list – Historical Trauma, Post Traumatic Growth, Social Identity Theory
Posted on: Sunday, January 28, 2018 3:56:20 AM PST
The objective in this unit is for you to understand the connections between historical and chosen trauma, posttraumatic growth, and social identity theory. You will become familiar with all three paradigms and how they are useful in conflict resolution.
For NCR 291 Week Two do the following.
- Read the following –
Vamik Volkan article on Chosen and Historical Trauma
See attached file. TRANSGENERITIONAL_TRANSMISSIONS.doc
Post Traumatic Growth and Positive Psychology
https://www.livehappy.com/science/positive-psychology/science-post-traumatic-growth
https://psychcentral.com/lib/post-traumatic-success-positive-psychology-solution-focused-strategies/
Description of the Famous Tajfel Experiment on Social Identity
http://mrsteen2016.weebly.com/uploads/2/3/6/1/23616912/tajfel__1970_.pdf
- Watch the following in-classfollowed by class discussion.
Vamik Volkan on Historical and Chosen Trauma (short portion of larger lecture)
Positive Psycholgy Ted Talk by Martin Seligman
Jenri Tajfel – Minimal Group Paradigm
- Answer the questions in the Unit Two Discussion area.
- In your words, explain Volkan’s approach in a short paragraph. Explain each element of his theory and create your own example to demonstrate your understanding.
- In your words, explain Tajfel’s approach in a short paragraph. Explain the importance of his study and provide a real life example showing the application of his theory.
- In your words, explain Seligman’s approach in a short paragraph. Explain and create your own example to demonstrate your understanding.
- Why is it useful to connect these three approaches when analyzing social conflict? How can you use these paradigms as a consultant?
- What are the implications for the practice of conflict resolution? Discuss. Do you think this bundle of approaches is useful? Can you see yourself applying them in your own practice?
- What are the implications for the related practice of organizational and community development? Discuss. What are the implications for “identity politics’?
Please complete the following HW Assignment for Chapter Two and submit it to the link by 9pm Sunday February 11 :
Sociology 386 Chapter Two Homework Assignment
Please answer the following questions in paragraph format. Please include the question before you begin your answer.
- What is a theory? What are its main components? How do researchers test their theory?
- What are the main claims of Freud’s psychoanalytic theory? Explain the different components of the psyche, according to Freud.
- What does it mean to say that psychoanalytic theory is deterministic?
- What does it mean to say that, according to Freud’s theory, the part of the human mind that a person can “see” is only the tip of the iceberg?
- What is Adler’s Individual Psychology? How does it differ from Freud’s theory?
- What is the psychodynamic approach to understanding human development?
- What is Sullivan’s Interpersonal Theory of Psychotherapy?
- What is a Freudian slip? Can you find a couple of examples?
- What is Erickson’s Theory of Psychosocial Development?
- What is Bowlby’s Attachment Theory?
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!