Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Unit 6 law discussion responses
1. A presumption is a legal inference or assumption that a fact exists, based on the known or proven existence of some other fact or group of facts (Hails, 2014). It serves as a substitute for evidence. A conclusive presumption is a presumption that the law demands be made from a set of facts that also cannot be refuted by evidence. An example of this when a child is born, to a couple married and living together, it is assumed that this is the child of the husband. On the other hand, there are rebuttable presumptions.Here, the opposing side may try to disprove either the basic fact or the presumed fact using contradictory evidence. A presumption can be disproven with facts that prove otherwise. For example, if a person has gone missing, and they have not been found for years. They are presumed to be dead. This idea can be disproven, but only if that same individual is found alive. Because there is a stipulation of providing contradictory evidence to be rebuttable, there is a need for distinction between the two.
2. A contrast conclusive presumption proves facts to be true. Rebuttable presumptions is one that concludes an existing or non existing fact. The comparison between these two are that they both determine a conclusion one is completely fact based while the other is not. Yes, this distinction is crucial due to the fact that there is no mishandling of information or evidence to cause confusion within the court room and the jury.
3. Conclusive presumptions are presumptions that cannot be overturned by any evidence or argument brought up in a criminal proceeding. An example of conclusive presumptions is a child younger than seven is not capable of committing a crime. They do not have the mindset of a criminal because their mind is still developing. A rebuttable presumption is the opposite of a conclusive presumption. This can be proven to be false with the correct evidence. For example, if a child has gone missing for more than seven years it is likely they are presumed dead. This distinction is crucial in a criminal proceeding because it gives a common sense of an issue.
4. A presumption is a legal inference or assumption that a fact exists, based on the know or proven existence of some other fact or group of facts (Hails, 2018). The conclusive presumption is that the law does not allow to be rebutted, also called irrebuttable presumption (FindLaw, 2013). An example would be a child who is 5 years old. It is presumed that the 5-year-old is incapable of committing a crime that is considered a felony. A rebuttable presumption is the opposing side can attempt to disprove either the basic fact or the presumed fact (Hails, 2018).
An example used all the time is in a criminal case, where a defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty. The distinction is crucial in a criminal proceeding; not knowing the distinction between them can confuse and mishandle the information. It would even cause someone to be wrongly convicted or let go to be free and be guilty because of not knowing the distinction.
5. A presumption is a legal inference or assumption that a fact exists based on the known or proven existence of some other fact or group of facts (Hails, 2014). In other words, the judge instructs the jury to draw specific conclusions from the facts. Presumptions are usually divided into two types: conclusive and rebuttable. Conclusive presumptions are not as common but the opposing side can attack the basic fact but cannot attack the presumed fact. While rebuttable presumptions are divided even more into strong and weak. With a strong rebuttable presumption, the opposing side may attack either basic fact or presumed fact.
With a weak rebuttable presumption, if the opposing side introduces evidence that disproves any part of the presumption then it is not told to the jury. With all presumptions the basic fact can be attacked, but only with rebuttable presumptions may the presumed fact be attacked. The basic fact can be attacked by making the witness not credible. I do believe the distinction is needed in criminal proceedings because without it the policy for the states regarding presumptions will be too broad. The more specific a policy is, the better it can be used because the attorneys will know how to use it and which one to use.
Hails, J. (2014). Criminal Evidence (Eighth ed.). Jaime Perkins.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!