Understanding Of Data Security Management
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Understanding Of Data Security Management
Final Project Assignment
Project Assignment:
This project will test your knowledge and understanding of Data Security Management as well as show you how to correctly create a well-constructed research paper. The Project will be completed in 3 phases with 3 different Deliverables that build upon each other. Each Deliverable will consist of a properly referenced paper. In-text citations and the Bibliography must use APA formatting.
Instructions:
Phase 1 Deliverable Heading 1 Topic: Identify and Describe SIEM.
Mechanics:
- Name the Deliverable: YourName__Final_Project_Phase_1.docx
- 1 to 3 single spaced pages not counting the Cover page, Table of Contents or Bibliography
- The Word Generated Cover page (or equivalent) has the following information:
- Your Name
- Date
- Course ID:
- Course Reference#: 2018_SPR_IG
- Project Title: Final Project: Data Security Management
- Font size: 11 point
- Font type: Calibri or equivalent
- 1 inch margins: Top/Bottom/Left/Right
- Header: Left-Your Name. Center-ISOL532 Final Project. Right-2018_SPR_IG
- Footer: Center: Page numbers
- At least 3 referenced sources following APA rules
- Upload the Deliverable to the Final Project dropbox.
Content: Each suggested topic below should be a Heading 2 paragraph (you should have at least 6 topics)
- SIEM acronym defined?
- Underlying Principles of SIEM
- The SIEM Process
- SIEM Implementation
- SIEM Attributes
- SIEM Benefits
Phase 2 Deliverable Heading 1 Topic: Identify at least 5 Best Practices concerning the selection and implementation of Data Security products and/or services.
Mechanics (same as Phase 1 with differences highlighted):
- Name the Deliverable:YourNamFinal_Project_Phase_2.docx
- 1 to 3 single spaced pages, which are added to your Phase 1 Deliverable
- The Cover page should already have the following information:
- Your Name
- Date
- Course ID:
- Course Reference#: example: 2018_SPR_IG
- Project Title: Final Project: Data Security Management
- Font size: 11 point
- Font type: Calibri or equivalent
- 1 inch margins: Top/Bottom/Left/Right
- Header: Left-Your Name. Center-ISOL532 Final Project. Right-2018_SPR_IG
- Footer: Center: Page numbers
- At least 3additional referenced sources
- Be sure to update your TOC and Bibliography
- Upload the Deliverable to the Final Project dropbox
Content: Each topic below should be a Heading 2 paragraph (You should have at least 5 Best Practices)
- Best Practice 1
- Best Practice 2
- Best Practice 3
- Best Practice 4
- Best Practice 5
- Best Practice N
Phase 3 Deliverable Heading 1 Topic: Discuss why SIEM projects fail.
Mechanics (same as Phase 1 with differences highlighted):
- Name the Deliverable: YourName_Final_Project_Phase_3.docx
- 1 to 3 single spaced pages, which are added to your Phase 2 Deliverable
- The Cover page should already have the following information:
- Your Name
- Date
- Course ID:
- Course Reference#: example: 2018_SPR_IG
- Project Title: Final Project: Data Security Management
- Font size: 11 point
- Font type: Calibri or equivalent
- 1 inch margins: Top/Bottom/Left/Right
- Header: Left-Your Name. Center-Final Project. Right-2018_SPR_IG
- Footer: Center: Page numbers
- At least 3 additional referenced sources
- Be sure to update your TOC and Bibliography
- Upload the Deliverable to the Final Project dropbox
Content: Each suggested topic below should be a Heading 2 paragraph (You should have at least 6 topics)
- SIEM Overreach?
- Technical Challenges?
- Organizational Cooperation?
- Organizational Commitment?
- Level of IT Maturity?
- Just a matter of Installing SIEM?
Directions:
Using an application such as Microsoft Word, based on your reading and supplemental research please complete the project as outlined above. Each Deliverable is to be uploaded to the Final Project dropbox by the due date (see syllabus). All three Deliverables are to be posted to the same dropbox. You may re-submit a Deliverable if your professor offers the opportunity in the feedback.
Grading:
The Final Project is worth 100 raw points (33, 33 and 34 points respectively for each of the three Deliverables). However, as with other course work the project is weighted. The project is weighted at 30%, which means it is worth 30% of your final grade. Remember Spelling, Grammar and the proper construction of the paper count as much as adequately addressing the research questions!
Grading rubric:
To receive full credit you must satisfy the following criteria:
1) Phase 1 Deliverable:
- Content
- Heading 1 title: Identify and Describe SIEM
- Heading 2 title: Acronym defined?
- Heading 2 title: Underlying principle(s) defined?
- Heading 2 title: Process defined?
- Heading 2 title: Implementation defined?
- Heading 2 title: Attributes defined?
- Heading 2 title: Benefits defined?
- Mechanics:
- Correct file naming convention used?
- Correct Heading Levels used
iii. 1 to 3 single spaced pages
- The Cover page has the following information:
- Student Name
- Course ID:
- Course Reference#: example: 123456
- Project Title: Final Project: Data Security Management
- The Table of Contents formatted correctly follows the Cover page
- The Body of the paper follows the TOC
vii. The Bibliography is the last page formatted correctly
viii. Font size: 11 point
- Font type: Calibri or equivalent
- 1 inch margins: Top/Bottom/Left/Right
- At least 3 APA referenced sources with in-text citations
2) Phase 2 Deliverable:
- Content
- Heading 1 title: SIEM Best Practices
- Heading 2 title: Best Practice 1
- Heading 2 title: Best Practice 2
- Heading 2 title: Best Practice 3
- Heading 2 title: Best Practice 4
- Heading 2 title: Best Practice 5
- Heading 2 title: Best Practice N
- Mechanics:
- Correct file naming convention used?
- Correct Heading Levels used
iii. 1 to 3 single spaced pages in addition to Phase 1 Deliverable
- The Cover page has the following information:
- Student Name
- Course ID:
- Course Reference#: example: 123456
- Project Title: Final Project: Data Security Management
- The Table of Contents formatted correctly follows the Cover page and is updated to reflect Phase 2 additions
- The Body of the paper follows the TOC
vii. The Bibliography is the last page formatted correctly and updated to reflect Phase 2 additions
viii. Font size: 11 point
- Font type: Calibri or equivalent
- 1 inch margins: Top/Bottom/Left/Right
- At least 3 additional APA referenced sources with in-text citations
3) Phase 3 Deliverable:
- Content
- Heading 1 title: Why SIEM Projects Fail
- Heading 2 title: SIEM Overreach
- Heading 2 title: Technical Challenges
- Heading 2 title: Organizational Cooperation
- Heading 2 title: Organizational Commitment
- Heading 2 title: Level of IT Maturity
- Heading 2 title: Just a matter of Installing SIEM
- Mechanics:
- Correct file naming convention used?
- Correct Heading Levels used
iii. 1 to 3 single spaced pages in addition to Phase 2 Deliverable
- The Cover page has the following information:
- Student Name
- Course ID:
- Course Reference#: example: 123456
- Project Title: Final Project: Data Security Management
- The Table of Contents formatted correctly follows the Cover page and is updated to reflect Phase 3 additions
- The Body of the paper follows the TOC
vii. The Bibliography is the last page formatted correctly and updated to reflect Phase 3 additions
viii. Font size: 11 point
- Font type: Calibri or equivalent
- 1 inch margins: Top/Bottom/Left/Right
- At least 3 additional APA referenced sources with in-text citations
D2L Rubric:
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!