The Moral Limits of Legal Intervention in Private Affairs
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
The Moral Limits of Legal Intervention in Private Affairs
The question of the moral limits of legal intervention in private affairs is a complex one, with arguments on both sides. On the one hand, it can be argued that the state has a duty to intervene in certain situations in order to protect individuals from harm or to ensure the greater good of society. On the other hand, it can be argued that individuals have a right to privacy and autonomy, and that the state should not interfere in their personal affairs unless absolutely necessary.
One of the most common arguments in favor of legal intervention in private affairs is the harm principle, which states that the state has a right to restrict the actions of individuals in order to prevent harm to others. For example, laws prohibiting domestic violence or child abuse are based on the harm principle, as they are designed to protect vulnerable individuals from harm. Similarly, laws prohibiting drunk driving or other dangerous activities are based on the principle of preventing harm to others.
However, the harm principle can be difficult to apply in practice, as it requires a subjective judgment about what constitutes harm and what level of risk is acceptable. Some argue that the state should not intervene in private affairs unless there is clear evidence of harm or a high level of risk, while others believe that the state should take a more proactive role in protecting individuals from harm.
Another argument in favor of legal intervention in private affairs is the idea of promoting the greater good of society. For example, laws requiring individuals to wear seat belts while driving or to vaccinate their children are based on the idea that these actions benefit society as a whole, even if they infringe on individual autonomy. Similarly, zoning laws and building codes are designed to ensure that buildings are safe and that communities are well-planned, even if they restrict the freedom of individual property owners.
However, critics of this approach argue that it can lead to an excessive level of state intervention in private affairs. They argue that individuals should have the right to make their own decisions about their lives, even if those decisions are not in the best interests of society as a whole. They also point out that the state is not always capable of making the best decisions for society, and that individual autonomy and freedom of choice are important values in their own right.
One area where the question of legal intervention in private affairs is particularly contentious is in the realm of personal relationships. For example, laws prohibiting incest or polygamy are based on the idea that these relationships are harmful or immoral, even if they are consensual. Similarly, laws prohibiting same-sex marriage or adoption are based on moral or religious objections, rather than any objective evidence of harm.
Critics of these laws argue that they are based on outdated or discriminatory beliefs, and that the state should not interfere in private relationships unless there is clear evidence of harm. They point out that consenting adults should be free to make their own decisions about their relationships, without interference from the state.
In conclusion, the question of the moral limits of legal intervention in private affairs is a complex and contentious one. While there are arguments in favor of state intervention to prevent harm or promote the greater good of society, there are also strong arguments in favor of individual autonomy and the right to privacy. Ultimately, the balance between these competing values will depend on the specific context and the values of the society in question.
The Moral Limits of Legal Intervention in Private Affairs
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!