The Mars Race: Who Will Win? 

The Mars Race: Who Will Win?

Description/Paper Instructions

The Mars Race: Who Will Win?

The race to Mars has been heating up in recent years, with several countries and private companies vying to be the first to successfully land humans on the Red Planet. While the idea of reaching Mars has been a goal for decades, recent advances in technology and increased global interest in space exploration have made the prospect of a manned mission to Mars seem more achievable than ever before. So, who will win the Mars race?

Currently, there are three main players in the race to Mars: NASA, SpaceX, and China. Each has its own approach and timeline for reaching the Red Planet.

NASA has been planning a manned mission to Mars for decades, with the goal of landing humans on the planet by the 2030s. The agency has been conducting extensive research on the planet’s environment, geology, and potential habitability through robotic missions such as the Mars Rover and the upcoming Mars 2020 mission. NASA also plans to build a manned gateway station in lunar orbit, which would serve as a staging area for Mars missions.

SpaceX, on the other hand, has a more aggressive timeline for reaching Mars. The company’s CEO, Elon Musk, has set a goal of launching the first manned mission to Mars as early as 2026, using a reusable spacecraft called the Starship. The Starship is designed to be capable of carrying up to 100 passengers, and its design includes a number of features aimed at making the journey to Mars more comfortable and safe.

China has also been ramping up its efforts to explore Mars, with the successful launch of its Tianwen-1 mission in July 2020. The mission includes an orbiter, a lander, and a rover, and is aimed at studying the planet’s geology, atmosphere, and potential for life. While China has not yet announced plans for a manned mission to Mars, it has stated that it hopes to become a major player in space exploration in the coming decades.

So, who will win the Mars race? It’s difficult to say, as each player has its own strengths and challenges. NASA has the advantage of experience and resources, as well as a proven track record in space exploration. SpaceX has the advantage of innovative technology and an ambitious timeline, as well as a significant amount of private funding. China has the advantage of a strong commitment to space exploration, as well as a rapidly advancing space program.

Ultimately, the winner of the Mars race may not be determined solely by who reaches the planet first, but by the discoveries and advancements made during the journey. The exploration of Mars has the potential to unlock new insights into the origins of the universe and the potential for life beyond Earth. It may also lead to new technologies and innovations that could have significant benefits for humanity.

In conclusion, the race to Mars is an exciting and competitive field, with multiple players vying to be the first to reach the Red Planet. While it’s difficult to predict who will ultimately win the race, the advancements made in space exploration and technology during the journey may ultimately be the true prize. As we continue to push the boundaries of scientific knowledge and technology, the exploration of Mars will undoubtedly play a critical role in shaping our understanding of the cosmos and our place within it.

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

The Mars Race: Who Will Win?

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!