The Legal and Moral Implications of Punishment

The Legal and Moral Implications of Punishment

Description/Paper Instructions

The Legal and Moral Implications of Punishment

Punishment is a complex issue with both legal and moral implications. It is used as a tool to deter individuals from committing criminal acts and to hold them accountable for their actions. However, the use of punishment raises questions about its effectiveness and its compatibility with moral principles.

From a legal perspective, punishment is a necessary part of the justice system. It serves as a deterrent to potential offenders and as a means of retribution for the harm caused by criminal actions. Punishment is imposed by the state, in the form of fines, imprisonment, community service, or even the death penalty, depending on the severity of the offense. The purpose of punishment is to ensure that individuals are held accountable for their actions and to protect society by removing dangerous individuals from the community.

However, the effectiveness of punishment as a deterrent has been questioned. Studies have shown that the threat of punishment may not be enough to deter individuals from committing crimes, especially in cases where the consequences of getting caught are not severe enough to outweigh the potential benefits of the criminal act. Moreover, punishment can have negative effects on individuals, such as trauma, stigmatization, and further criminalization, which can hinder their ability to reintegrate into society and lead law-abiding lives.

From a moral perspective, punishment raises questions about the compatibility of punishment with ethical principles. One of the main moral objections to punishment is that it is based on the principle of retribution, which seeks to inflict harm on an individual in response to harm inflicted on others. This raises the question of whether it is ethical to harm someone in response to their harmful actions, or whether the harm inflicted by punishment is itself immoral.

Another moral objection to punishment is that it can be seen as a form of vengeance rather than justice. Vengeance seeks to harm an individual for the sake of harming them, while justice seeks to restore the harm caused by criminal actions. This raises the question of whether punishment should be based on the desire to inflict harm on the offender, or on the desire to restore justice and make amends for the harm caused.

There are also moral questions about the fairness and equity of punishment. Punishment is often applied unevenly, with marginalized communities and individuals facing harsher punishments than more privileged groups. This raises questions about whether punishment is being applied fairly and whether the justice system is serving everyone equally.

In conclusion, punishment is a complex issue with both legal and moral implications. While it is necessary for the functioning of the justice system, questions about its effectiveness, compatibility with moral principles, and fairness and equity must be addressed. As society evolves and our understanding of justice and punishment changes, it is important to continue to critically evaluate the use of punishment and to seek more just and ethical approaches to holding individuals accountable for their actions.

The Legal and Moral Implications of Punishment

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!