The Ethics of Legal Advocacy

The Ethics of Legal Advocacy

Description/Paper Instructions

The Ethics of Legal Advocacy: Navigating Moral Boundaries

Legal advocacy is an important aspect of the legal profession, as it allows lawyers to represent clients and argue for their rights and interests in legal proceedings. However, there are ethical boundaries that lawyers must navigate when engaging in legal advocacy, as they have a duty to uphold the integrity of the legal system and to act in a manner that is consistent with their obligations to their clients and the legal profession as a whole.

One of the key ethical issues that lawyers must grapple with in legal advocacy is the tension between zealous advocacy and truthfulness. On the one hand, lawyers have a duty to vigorously represent their clients and to make persuasive arguments on their behalf. This can involve using tactics such as aggressive cross-examination or arguing for a legal interpretation that may be a stretch but still falls within the bounds of reason. On the other hand, lawyers also have a duty to be truthful and not to engage in deceitful or misleading conduct. This can be a challenging balance to strike, particularly in cases where the truth may be difficult to discern or where the stakes are high.

Another ethical issue that arises in legal advocacy is the duty of loyalty to the client versus the duty to uphold the law and the administration of justice. Lawyers have a primary duty to their clients and must act in their best interests, even if doing so may conflict with their own personal beliefs or the greater good. However, lawyers also have a duty to the legal system and must not engage in conduct that undermines its integrity or fairness. This can be particularly challenging in cases where the client’s interests conflict with the lawyer’s own ethical obligations or where the lawyer may be asked to engage in conduct that is questionable or unethical.

A related issue is the duty of confidentiality versus the duty to report misconduct. Lawyers have a duty to maintain the confidentiality of their clients’ information and to protect their clients’ interests. However, lawyers also have a duty to report misconduct by other lawyers or to take action to prevent harm to the legal system or the public. This can be a difficult balancing act, particularly when the lawyer may be torn between conflicting obligations or when the misconduct is committed by a colleague or mentor.

Finally, lawyers must navigate ethical issues related to their own personal biases and prejudices. Like all human beings, lawyers are susceptible to unconscious biases and prejudices that may affect their judgment or behavior. Lawyers must be aware of these biases and take steps to mitigate their impact, such as by seeking input from others or by engaging in self-reflection and awareness-building activities. They must also be mindful of the potential impact of their actions on others and seek to ensure that they are not engaging in conduct that is discriminatory or unfair.

In conclusion, legal advocacy is a complex and challenging field that requires lawyers to navigate a wide range of ethical issues and obligations. Lawyers must balance their duty to their clients with their duty to the legal system and the public, and they must act in a manner that upholds the integrity and fairness of the legal system. This can be a difficult balancing act, particularly in cases where the interests of the client conflict with the lawyer’s own ethical obligations or where the lawyer is faced with difficult decisions related to truthfulness, loyalty, confidentiality, and personal biases. Ultimately, lawyers must be guided by their own moral compass and a deep commitment to upholding the principles of justice, fairness, and the rule of law.

The Ethics of Legal Advocacy

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!