The End of Respectability Politics in United States
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
The End of Respectability Politics in United States
Running Head: COMMENTARY
Was the Convention a success or a failure?
The Convention was not a success, but it failed on its purpose for several reasons. One, there was so much massacre due to confrontation that was going on between members of the public and the police. Lives were left in the unrest, and there was no order after the Convention (Musser, 2021). It was a convention that experienced too much chaos, disorder, and even unrest. The connections were also not a success because they saw Martin Luther King killed. He was one of the most promising and brave leaders who could have taken the American presidency. However, his life was lost in an assassination that has never been uncovered.
Did the Democrats pick a good candidate? How does he compare to Nixon?
The Democrats were very accurate in the selection of the candidate. The candidate was up-and-coming and had the potential to be the president. Under his presidency, American could have enjoyed the best presidential leadership ever. He had learned a lot to lead a country from his boss, the former president. He had acquired skills as well as knowledge in the presidency. Therefore, he was a ready candidate for his boss when he served as the vice president. Thus, Democrats had a good selection of a candidate. From polls, it was even sure that Hubert Humphrey could have won the election were it not for his negligence over FBI Surveillance. If he could have used this surveillance to his advantage, he could have won the election, bearing in mind the small margin of votes that made Nixon the president (Boomhower, 2020).
There were a lot of differences between Hubert Humphrey and Nixon that made Hubert Humphrey a better presidential candidate. One, he was a peace-loving mind. After informing Lyndon Johnson that Nixon was planning to use China-assisted support to compromise the election results (Critchlow, 2018), he opted not to confront Nixon and his team. He opted to let the ballot deice, but he eventually lost to Nixon, who is believed to have compromised the votes and results.
Hubert Humphrey was not as corrupt as Nixon was. He had the advantage of using the presidential system, comprising the election results, and winning the poll. However, he chose to retain election integrity and even decided to retain his race to the presidency as clean as possible, unlike Nixon, who planned to use all corrupt earns to win the polls.
Hubert Humphrey did not have the guts for the election as Nixon displayed. Nixon was obsessed with winning the election, and he had all the determination with him. Unlike Nixon, Hubert Humphrey did not even mind the advantage that FBI surveillance could have given him during the election. If he capitalized on FBI surveillance, it could have been possible for him to cover and even surpass the small margin of win that had been set by Nixon (Chambliss, 2018).
Certainly, Hubert Humphrey was also a coward and never had the guts to confront the ill in the election. He had all the information and the plans to leak votes Nixon had. He never knew the machinery in place that was to ad Nixon win the election. However, he was brave enough to blow the whistle. Thus, no matter how much support people tried to give him, he lost the election. Even though his supporters’ voters were close to winning his presidency, the deceitful strategies used by Nixon gave him a small margin win. This would be a win that Nixon could never have if Hubert Humphrey were brave enough to disclose the ills and corrupt strategies that Nixon had in place to compromise polls.
Is he likely to win back white Democrats who are likely to support Wallace?
If Hubert Humphrey was to run for the presidential position once again, he is likely to win even from white people supporting Wallace. One reason he is likely to win is that he would suffer from setbacks experienced during 1968. During this time, there was a significant divide among democrats. There were not set to win as they were much divided. This meant they had no common voice and could not mobilize their votes. However, under the unity of democrats, Hubert Humphrey had a high likelihood of winning over Wallace.
Secondly, he is likely to take the significant contribution of FBI surveillance during the election period. This would help Hubert Humphrey seal any loophole meant to compromise the pools. Thus, he would squarely win over Wallace. He is likely to set a high margin to cover up for Wallace. During the 1968 election, he lost become of not working closely with the FBI for surveillance purposes.
Furthermore, he would start his campaign early enough like any other candidate. In his 1968 presidential bid, he declared his candidature when it was just late. Thus, he never had time to leverage the full support he could have received from his supporters. If he is to run again for the same position, he would understand the early campaign’s role in winning the election. He is likely to leverage his popularity and win the election with ease.
Did the protesters change things for good or ill?
The protests were inevitable, and there was a lot that was changed. The Vietnam War ended as America was wishing (Harewood, 2021). They had reached a point where they felt the war was baseless and was headed nowhere. Therefore, ending the war was all Americans wanted, and it finally ended. Secondly, there was a withdrawal of American soldiers from Vietnam. Americans felt that their soldiers were being killed in a war that was not prosing anything. Therefore, they wanted their sons to withdraw from the bate field and return to their families. After the arrest of more than 660 protesters and more than 1000 sustaining injuries, it was inevitable, but US troops had to be withdrawn. It was a protection that was deadly but fully inevitable for America.
REFERENCES:
Harewood, A. J. (2021). The End of Respectability Politics: The United States Civil Rights Movement, Liberalism and The Vietnam War (Doctoral dissertation, Carleton University).
Musser, C. (2021). 15.“By, For and About”: Black Journal and the Rise of Multicultural Documentary in New York City, 1968–1975. In William Greaves (pp. 246-270). Columbia University Press.
Critchlow, D. T. (2018). CHAPTER EIGHT: Nixon Betrays the Right. In Phyllis Schlafly and Grassroots Conservatism (pp. 183-211). Princeton University Press.
Boomhower, R. E. (2020). Fighting the Good Fight: John Bartlow Martin and Hubert Humphrey’s 1968 Presidential Campaign. Indiana Magazine of History, 116(1), 1-29.
Chambliss, W. J. (2018). Power, politics, and crime. Routledge.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!