The Business Ethics Research Paper

The Business Ethics Research Paper

Description/Paper Instructions

The Business Ethics Research Paper

Business, Ethics, Research, Paper

Using the MLB steroids case as an example, explain how unethical choices by some players harms players who comply with the rules.

This posting should be at least 250 words.  Respond to at least 2 other postings on separate days in each forum by 11:59 PM (Eastern) on Saturday.  Your primary posting can end with a “tag-line” or a related question of your own.  Your secondary postings can either answer another student’s question, or comment on their answering my question.  In addition, please ensure that you answer all of my questions.

Being in competitive world, competitors face many challenging situation and respected as legends and too much and best immense of expectations on them. When they get into sports with greatness, success will automatically follow them and there will be hand over their opponents and sometimes illegal substances are used by them like steroids.

They believe by taking such medications will improve contend on more elevated level and try ignoring the negative aspects of heath. Due to such instances, so many players have discoloured the profession and marked as offenders. Such misconducts lead to delivering physical mischief on the players, defeating the game, making detestable case on such individuals (Bryant. H)

A meeting which held in 2003 regarding the embarrassment of steroids at Major League Baseball, the official of MLB, Bud. Selig stated ‘The utilization of steroids in my game is demolishing the focused nature and destroying America’s leisure activity, when using such steroids while playing a sport in baseball would keep on developing that it would demolish the game and damage the competitors.

Later of the season, the community found that eight percent of players actually use the execution of upgrading drugs. Mr Selig actualized all the players to be tried during the year and be dependent upon a boundless measure of irregular testing whenever associated with use and introduced strict punishments as a fine and immediate suspension without any pay for any baseball players who found using steroids.

Jose Canseco confessed utilizing steroids while he was playing baseball for Oakland Athletics where he and his partners used steroids which helped to improve the game and easily defeat the opponents (Nightenagle. B, 2019)

References:

Bryant. H, retrieved from https://www.baseball-reference.com/bullpen/Steroids

Nightengale. B, 2019, retrieved from https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/columnist/bob-nightengale/2019/07/08/mlb-steroids-bud-selig-1990-s-mark-mcgwire-sammy-sosa/1666902001/

MLB is a Major League Baseball Professional Organization which contains around 3 teams which plays in the American and national Leagues. Analysis, Investigation and research have been done in the players to correlate between the drugs and the financial ability.

Some research indicated that to have the All-star rating and get good salaries, some unmonitored players took the steroids, Performance enhancing drugs to boost their performance while playing which will boost the energy and efficiency in the game. It also indicates that these performance enhancing drugs can be help with the short-term win and gains. But in the long term win it could be problem.

Coming to the ethical and unethical actions, Not breaking the laws doesn’t mean that we are following the moral principles and values and behaving ethical. Sometimes the law or rules may be loosely coupled or bounded to the actions which we are taking (Pantuosco, L. J. (2011)). Competitive edge is also the reason for the actions, the environment should be in the positive way not in the negative way and lead to win in the wrong manner.

This will create a bad impression on the whole team and because of some players in the team whole team will be in problem and nee to face the consequences and actions. Some players think that defeating the opponents is easy with these enhancing drugs and started using them.

Unethical actions by some members in the team will also promote and trigger an action in the other team member to focus in the same direction as he is achieving in the same direction. Competitive edge to win the games, looking at the seniors or teammates, bad behavior had been passed to many in the team and almost 80 % were tested positive with the performance enhancing drugs.

As we know that Bad or evil spreads faster than good or truth, in the same manner the same thing of using the drugs continued in the teammates. The reason is like that One bad apple spoils the whole basket or if we use the apple in the juice it will spoil the whole juice. In the same way this created negative affected and unethical behavior of using performance drugs, steroids are passed among all the game players. (Junger, J., & Garcia, P. (2019)).

Others following the rules are also later influenced by all the actions that are being taken place in the academy. Besides this the people who don’t take any steroids may under perform and may not be selected as they are not using any enhancing drugs or steroids for their game play. The main reason is looking after the one who used it and comparing with the recognition and money earned by them.

All these happened is due to lack of proper testing for drugs and policies in the organization. After all these consequences lot of policies have been incorporated and USA Senate has passed a memo for the Organization and asked to follow the guidelines in it. Lessons were learned by the mistakes done by the organization due to poor maintenance of program to avoid the screening cost (Mahoney, K. (2009).).

References

• Junger, J., & Garcia, P. (2019). Juicing with Friends: Compliance Lessons from Baseball’s Steroid Era: One Bad Apple Can Spoil the Bunch. Journal of Health Care Compliance, 21(6), 47–56.
• Pantuosco, L. J. (2011). Does It Pay to Be Unethical? The Case of Performance Enhancing Drugs in Mlb. American Economist, 56(2), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/056943451105600208
• Mahoney, K. (2009). Learning from the Mistakes of Others: Changing Major League Baseball’s Substance Abuse Arbitration Procedure. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 24(3), 613–640.

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!