Discussion Board ( no double spacing no apa)
1. Discuss your understanding of the perpetuation of prejudice according to Kent L. Koppelman chp 2.( Understanding Human Difference 6th edition)
2. What are the major causes promoting the development of prejudice?
Rubric is attached and Koppelman Ch 2
At least three (3) well developed entries (3 is the minimum)
(approximately 250 words in the initial entry (in-depth) and 75-100 words in subsequent entries)
Class Discussion Rubric
Exemplary (Exceeds
Expectations)
Competent (Meets Expectations)
Needs Improvement Non-Existent
Developed Entries Weight 25.00%
At least three (3) well developed entries (3 is the minimum) (approximately 250 words in the initial entry (in-depth) and 75-100 words in subsequent entries)
Less than three (3) clearly stated entries (200-250 words in the initial entry (in- depth) and 50-75 words in subsequent entries)
Less than two (2) clearly stated entries (150-200 words in the initial entry (in- depth) and 25-50 words in subsequent entries)
No well-stated entries (Less than 150 words in the initial entry (in-depth) and less than 25 words in subsequent entries)
Command of Content Weight 25.00%
Offers an exemplary command of content -Include comprehensive analysis of the article – -good parts/bad parts/omissions/new ideas/relevancy/other . -Does not confuse analysis and opinion. -Finds a strong balance among formal analysis, opinion, and personal experiences.
Offers competency of command of content -Include competent analysis of the article – -good parts/bad parts/omissions/new ideas/relevancy/other . -Does not confuse analysis and opinion. -Finds a strong balance among formal analysis, opinion, and personal experiences.
Offers minimal command of content -Include minimal analysis of the article – -good parts/bad parts/omissions/new ideas/relevancy/other . -Does not confuse analysis and opinion. -Finds a strong balance among formal analysis, opinion, and personal experiences.
Does not exhibit a command of content -Does not include an analysis of the article – -good parts/bad parts/omissions/new ideas/relevancy/other . -Does not confuse analysis and opinion. -Finds a strong balance among formal analysis, opinion, and personal experiences.
Citations Weight 20.00%
Comprehensively cites article and other resources Includes multiple references BEYOND the assigned reading or discussion questions. To be sure that you achieve an EXEMPLARY grade – cite multiple related sources from other readings from books or Internet sources.
Competently cites article and other resources Includes a couple of references BEYOND the assigned reading or discussion questions. To be sure that you achieve a COMPETENT grade – cite a couple of related sources from other readings from books or Internet sources.
Minimally cites article and other resources Includes a couple of references BEYOND the assigned reading or discussion questions. To be sure that you achieve a NEEDS IMPROVEMENT grade – cite a related source from other readings from books or Internet sources.
Lacks cited articles and other resources Does not include references BEYOND the assigned reading or discussion questions.
Professionalis m & Sensitivity Weight 10.00%
Comprehensively exhibits sensitivity to other’s opinions and class discussion Reads and responds to others’ comments during the week’s discussion. Two (2) or more of entries are substantive responses
Competently exhibits sensitivity to other’s opinions and class discussion Reads and responds to others’ comments during the week’s discussion. At least one entry is a substantive response
Marginally exhibits sensitivity to other’s opinions and class discussion Reads and responds to others’ comments during the week’s discussion. Response to a peer’s comments
Does not exhibit sensitivity to other’s opinions and class discussion Does not appear to have read and does not appropriately respond to others’ comments during the week’s discussion.
to a peer’s comments. Compensatively exhibits diplomacy and solicits consideration of alternatives.
to a peer’s comments. Demonstrates diplomacy and solicits consideration of alternatives.
are not substantive. Lacks diplomacy.
Personal Connections Weight 10.00%
Comprehensively makes relevant connections with personal experiences Comprehensively applies the reading to one’s own personal experiences. Allocates some (not all) entries to how the article’s contents apply to one’s unique life story and work setting. Caution: DO NOT place information that might incriminate a co- worker, family member, friend, or institution in your entries…this is a public forum.
Competently makes relevant connections with personal experiences Competently applies the reading to one’s own personal experiences. Allocates few (not all) entries to how the article’s contents apply to one’s unique life story and work setting. Caution: DO NOT place information that might incriminate a co- worker, family member, friend, or institution in your entries…this is a public forum.
Marginally makes relevant connections with personal experiences Marginally applies the reading to one’s own personal experiences. Allocates an entry to how the article’s contents apply to one’s unique life story and work setting. Caution: DO NOT place information that might incriminate a co- worker, family member, friend, or institution in your entries…this is a public forum.
Does not make relevant connections with personal experiences Does not apply the reading to one’s own personal experiences. Does not allocate a single entry to how the article’s contents apply to one’s unique life story and work setting.
Conventions of Writing Weight 10.00%
Compressively offers contributions indicative of graduate-level performance Although chats are relatively informal…every entry should reflect your status as a graduate student. Use the conventions of writing as correct punctuation and grammar. Consider developing your entries in your word- processing program and pasting into the DISCUSSION area. If you become TOO INFORMAL the instructor may send a friendly reminder (especially about the
Competently offers contributions indicative of graduate-level performance Although chats are relatively informal…every entry should reflect your status as a graduate student. Use the conventions of writing as correct punctuation and grammar. Consider developing your entries in your word- processing program and pasting into the DISCUSSION area. If you become TOO INFORMAL the instructor may send a friendly reminder (especially about the
Marginally offers contributions indicative of graduate-level performance Although chats are relatively informal…every entry should reflect your status as a graduate student. Use the conventions of writing as correct punctuation and grammar. Consider developing your entries in your word- processing program and pasting into the DISCUSSION area. If you become TOO INFORMAL the instructor may send a friendly reminder (especially about the
Does not offer contributions indicative of graduate-level performance Although chats are relatively informal…every entry should reflect your status as a graduate student. Use the conventions of writing as correct punctuation and grammar. Consider developing your entries in your word- processing program and pasting into the DISCUSSION area. If you become TOO INFORMAL the instructor may send a friendly reminder (especially about the
initial, extended entry). These DISCUSSIONS are EXCELLENT preparation for graduate comprehensive examinations.
initial, extended entry). These DISCUSSIONS are EXCELLENT preparation for graduate comprehensive examinations.
initial, extended entry). These DISCUSSIONS are EXCELLENT preparation for graduate comprehensive examinations.
initial, extended entry). These DISCUSSIONS are EXCELLENT preparation for graduate comprehensive examinations.