telehealth technology application of essay assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Description
Note: Your needs assessment will provide the basis for the remaining assessments in this course.
Preparation
Telehealth technology can be representative of many different scenarios. For example, the technology could be designed to assist nurses with providing care, such as chronic disease management, to rural patients. It could also be designed to enable physicians to access enhanced care strategies from other providers in another part of the United States, or internationally. Such care strategies might include radiology readings or assistance in an operating room with a new procedure.
For this assessment and all remaining assessments, choose any new or upgraded telehealth technology that you would like to see implemented in your organization or practice setting. Be creative and imagine what it would be like to have any telehealth resources that would benefit your community. Then, imagine that executive leaders in your organization or practice setting are considering the purchase of those resources to improve the quality of care provided to patients and enable medical and nursing staff to extend coverage for patients in the region.
Finally, as a nurse leader with responsibilities in upper management, imagine that you have been asked to determine whether this purchase will adequately address key issues in patient care and lead to improved outcomes.
To prepare for the assessment, you are encouraged to reflect on performance gaps in your organization, what outcomes are measured, and how telehealth technologies can help to improve outcomes. Also, consider how you would effectively communicate the need for a new or upgraded technology to executive leaders in a way that will help you obtain their support. In addition, you may wish to:
Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide to ensure that you understand the work you will be asked to complete.
Review the Guiding Questions: Technology Needs Assessment document, which includes questions to consider and additional guidance on how to successfully complete the assessment.Note: Remember that you can submit all or a portion of your draft needs assessment summary to Smart thinking Tutoring for feedback before you submit the final version for this assessment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback.
Requirements
Determine the need for the new or upgraded telehealth technology. Present your findings and recommendations in an executive summary. Include any available assessments and gap analyses that may have been conducted previously.
Complete the Vila Health: Preparing for a Technology Needs Assessment simulation, linked in the required resources.
The executive summary requirements, outlined below, correspond to the grading criteria in the Technology Needs Assessment Scoring Guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. The Guiding Questions: Technology Needs Assessment document, linked in the required resources, provides additional considerations that may be helpful in completing your assessment. In addition, be sure to note the requirements below for document format and length and for citing supporting evidence.
Explain the relevance and importance of a needs assessment.
Identify the key issues in nursing care affecting patient outcomes that the new or upgraded telehealth technology will address.
Identify the safety requirements and regulatory considerations when using this technology.
Identify the patient confidentiality and privacy protections that this technology must address.
Describe the potential impact of internal and external stakeholders and end users on the acquisition of this technology.
Support assertions, arguments, conclusions, and recommendations with relevant and credible evidence.
Write clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style.
Document Format and LengthFormat your executive summary using APA style.
Use the APA Style Paper Template, linked in the resources. An APA Style Paper Tutorial is also provided to help you in writing and formatting your executive summary. Be sure to include:
A title page and references page. An abstract is not required.
A running head on all pages.
Appropriate level 1 section headings.
Your executive summary should be 3–4 pages in length, not including the title page and references page.
Supporting EvidenceCite at least five credible sources from peer-reviewed journals or professional industry publications to support your implementation plan.
CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Explain the relevance and importance of a needs assessment. Does not explain the relevance and importance of a needs assessment. Attempts to explain the relevance and importance of a needs assessment, but omits some obvious consequences of doing or not doing the needs assessment. Explains the relevance and importance of a needs assessment. Explains the relevance and importance of a needs assessment, and identifies assumptions underlying the suggested needs assessment.Identify the key issues in nursing care affecting patient outcomes that a new or upgraded telehealth technology will address. Does not identify the key issues in nursing care affecting patient outcomes that a new or upgraded telehealth technology will address. Attempts to identify the key issues in nursing care that a new or upgraded telehealth technology will address, but fails to clearly explain the effect on specific patient outcomes. Identifies the key issues in nursing care affecting patient outcomes that a new or upgraded telehealth technology will address. Identifies the key issues in nursing care affecting patient outcomes that a new or upgraded telehealth technology will address, and impartially considers conflicting evidence and/or other perspectives.
Identify the safety requirements and regulatory considerations when using a new or upgraded telehealth technology. Does not identify the safety requirements and regulatory considerations when using a new or upgraded telehealth technology. Identifies the safety requirements, but fails to consider relevant regulatory factors. Identifies the safety requirements and regulatory considerations when using a new or upgraded telehealth technology. Identifies the safety requirements and regulatory considerations when using a new or upgraded telehealth technology, and suggests criteria that could be used to evaluate whether requirements are met.
Identify the patient confidentiality and privacy protections that a new or upgraded telehealth technology must address. Does not identify the patient confidentiality and privacy protections that new or upgraded telehealth technology must address. Attempts to identify the patient confidentiality and privacy protections, but fails to consider relevant safeguarding features or security risks. Identifies the patient confidentiality and privacy protections that a new or upgraded telehealth technology must address. Identifies the patient confidentiality and privacy protections that a new or upgraded telehealth technology must address, and identifies knowledge gaps, unknowns, missing information, unanswered questions, or areas of uncertainty.
Describe the potential impact of internal and external stakeholders and end users on the acquisition of a new or upgraded telehealth technology. Does not describe the potential impact of internal and external stakeholders and end users on the acquisition of a new or upgraded telehealth technology. Attempts to describe the potential impact of stakeholders on technology acquisition, but fails to consider possible interactions with some stakeholders. Describes the potential impact of internal and external stakeholders and end users on the acquisition of a new or upgraded telehealth technology. Describes the potential impact of internal and external stakeholders and end users on the acquisition of a new or upgraded telehealth technology, and identifies assumptions on which this description is based.
Support assertions, arguments, conclusions, and recommendations with relevant and credible evidence. Does not support assertions, arguments, conclusions, and recommendations with relevant and credible evidence. Provides sources that lack relevance or credibility, or the evidence is not persuasive or explicitly supportive of assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations. Supports assertions, arguments, conclusions, and recommendations with relevant and credible evidence. Supports assertions, arguments, conclusions, and recommendations with relevant, credible, and convincing evidence. Skillfully combines error-free source citations with a perceptive and coherent synthesis of the evidence.
Write clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style. Does not write clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style. Writes with a lack of clarity or conciseness. Writing is loosely structured, or includes errors in grammar, mechanics, or APA formatting that inhibit effective communication or detract from good scholarship. Writes clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style. Writes clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style. Main points, ideas, arguments, or propositions are well-developed and engaging. Adheres to all applicable disciplinary and scholarly writing standards and conventions.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
|