Space Junk: Cleaning up Our Mess 

Space Junk: Cleaning up Our Mess

Description/Paper Instructions

Space Junk: Cleaning up Our Mess

Space junk, also known as orbital debris, is a growing problem that poses a threat to our space infrastructure and the safety of our astronauts. It refers to the human-made objects orbiting the Earth that no longer serve a useful purpose, such as old satellites, rocket stages, and other debris.

As more and more countries launch satellites into orbit for communication, navigation, weather monitoring, and other purposes, the amount of space junk has increased dramatically. In addition, collisions between space debris and functioning satellites or spacecraft can generate even more debris, creating a dangerous feedback loop.

The potential dangers of space junk are significant. Even small pieces of debris can travel at high speeds and cause significant damage to satellites or spacecraft, leading to communication disruptions, navigational errors, or even complete failure of critical systems. In addition, debris can pose a threat to astronauts on spacewalks or in spacecraft, potentially causing serious injury or death.

To address this problem, scientists and engineers are working on a variety of solutions to clean up space junk. One approach is to actively remove debris from orbit using specialized spacecraft equipped with robotic arms or nets. These spacecraft could capture and retrieve debris, then either return it to Earth or send it into the atmosphere to burn up on re-entry.

Another approach is to use lasers to vaporize small pieces of debris, causing them to lose altitude and re-enter the Earth’s atmosphere. This technique, known as laser ablation, has the advantage of being able to target small pieces of debris that are difficult to track using traditional methods.

Some researchers are also exploring the use of autonomous robots to capture and dispose of space debris. These robots could use advanced sensors and artificial intelligence to navigate through space, identify debris, and capture it using robotic arms or other tools.

Preventing the creation of new space junk is another key component of space debris mitigation. This involves designing spacecraft and satellites to be more resilient to collisions and creating guidelines for responsible space operations, including responsible satellite disposal and avoidance of collision-prone orbits.

Finally, improving our ability to track and monitor space debris is critical for effective space debris mitigation. This involves developing better sensors and tracking systems to identify and monitor debris, as well as sharing information between countries and organizations to improve space traffic management and reduce the risk of collisions.

In conclusion, space junk is a growing problem that poses a significant threat to our space infrastructure and the safety of our astronauts. However, there are a variety of solutions being developed to address this problem, including active debris removal, laser ablation, and the use of autonomous robots. By working together to prevent the creation of new space junk and improve our ability to track and monitor debris, we can ensure the continued safety and functionality of our space infrastructure for generations to come.

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

Space Junk: Cleaning up Our Mess

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!