Samsung Corporation Market Environment Analysis
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
- Does Samsung have a cost advantage, a differentiation advantage, or both a cost and differentiation advantage over its rivals?
From the year 2003 to 2007 Samsung has had a lower average operating cost than its rivals Micron, Hynix and Infineon. This cost advantage enabled Samsung to achieve a high operating profit as seen in Exhibit 1 of the case study which illustrates Samsung to be the only company to record positive net income from 2001 to 2003. Although Samsung is a Chinese company, it does not derive this advantage due to cheap financing because the company is largely self financed.
Many of Samsung’s decisions early on helped solidify its cost advantage. For instance, by concentrating its functions in its R&D facility in Seoul, Samsung experienced fab construction cost savings at an estimated 12%. Engineers were able to alter production technology in order to produce multiple product lines which eliminated the need for specific equipment for various lines of Samsung’s products.
Despite Samsung’s annual wage being higher than its rivals’ average, they still had a lower average labor cost per unit of $0.54 than its competitors as demonstrated in Exhibit 7a. In addition to that, Samsung also has a lower average raw materials cost per unit than its rivals.
Samsung’s differentiation advantage is derived from its technological innovation. Its differentiation advantage came from creating a unique culture at the main R&D site in Seoul unlike its rivals whose facilities were scattered across the globe. Samsungs heavy investment in R&D enables it to respond quickly to changing demand and customer trends. Samsung enjoys a higher price premium than its rivals as shown in Exhibit 7.
Following both strategies has allowed Samsung to achieve relative lower costs than its rivals and create uniqueness valuables to its buyers, which has proven to be the key to its success.
2: What are the resources and capabilities that form the basis of Samsung’s cost or differentiation advantage(s)?
Samsung’s resources and capabilities are:
- Strategic Pricing: Samsung offers reliable memory chips at low cost. In addition, the company decreased cost in other areas. For example, it saved an estimated 12% of fab construction cost by having all its fab lines and R&D main facility in a single site.
- Product Innovation and Development: Samsung produces different types of memories to meet customer’s demands: “As of 2003, Samsung offered over 1,200 variations of DRAM products” (Siegel, 8)
- Experience in other products: Samsung attempted to obtain a competitive advantage in other products such as the Flash Memory.
- Knowledge, Expertise, and Reputation: Samsung has been in the industry since 1938. In addition, Samsung attracts global talent that allows the company to keep up with the challenges that globalization brings to the industry.
- Effective Human Resources Policies: For Samsung, employees are key for success. The company provides various compensation programs to increase job satisfaction, attract global talent, and boost productivity.
- Effective Leadership Practices and Organizational Culture: Throughout the years, Samsung had efficient leaders that had made the right decision at the right times. In addition, The company values and considers feedback from all its employees while working on the design and production of a new product.
- Strong R&D team: Samsung invests in innovation and new technologies to provide high quality products. “Unlike its competitors, Samsung tried to create new uses for DRAMS” (Siegel, 8).
- How difficult is it for competitors to replicate these resources and capabilities and thus how sustainable are Samsung’s competitive advantage(s)?
It is not difficult to replicate some tangible resources that Samsung consists of such as, the actual semiconductor equipment. However, it can be difficult to replicate sources such as global talent acquired, the extensive industry knowledge acquired through experience by all managers, and the organizational culture built by diverse employees in South Korea. The culture of putting quality first and investment in its employees’ lives can be difficult to replicate by competitors. The Human Resource policies of taking care of employees’ 90% of their problem allows them to increase innovation and productivity. The incentive programs can be difficult to replicate as well depending on a competitor’s financial budgets.
- What are the strategic issues that Samsung faces? Specifically, how big of a threat does the emergence of Chinese competitor (SMIC) pose to Samsung’s continued success?
- What changes to Samsung’s strategy needs to be made to address the potential threat posed by SMIC?
- Why would you believe that your recommended strategy will address the potential threat posed by SMIC effectively?
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!