Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Title: see instructions -zhaiwenhua
Paper type Coursework
Paper format MLA
Course level Undergraduate
Subject Area Other (Not listed)
# pages 1 ( or 300 words Minimum)
Spacing Double Spacing
# sources 0
Paper Details
For the Final, if you were in class the day the Presentations were due (December 5), you joined a group for the Roleplaying Activity that we will do on the day of the Final.
The Roleplaying Handout is included as a photo below.
Here is the Summary of the Video Games and Action Figures the class created that you can use in your Groups as you build your side’s point. Group One will argue IN FAVOR of the games and action figures (you are all on the same side), and Group Two will argue AGAINST the games and action figures. If you want to create games to give additional examples, that’s fine.
FOR THE ROLEPLAYING: Next week, the Toy Board (Group Three) will run the Meeting, and here are some rules for roleplaying:
1. Each person needs a name and a connection to the group. This should not be your real name. Example: My name is Mandy Mendez, and I worked as the Lead Designer on “Sunshine and Lollipops make a Rainbow.”
2. During the Roleplaying, stay in character! This is not Mt SAC; it is Gainsville, Florida, where the Toy Board (or its new title) reviews toys and games to decide whether they can remain on the market or not
3. EACH PERSON SPEAKS at the meeting. Everyone in the group should have a story or an example to explain. For example, if you are a child who was hurt by playing “The War,” you need to explain what about the game was harmful to you. Be specific!
4. The Toy Board will run the meeting. MAKE NOTES about your Rules (everyone should have notes) so you won’t forget what you want to say.
After the meeting, the Toy Board will go outside and make a final decision about whether the games and toys will stay on the market or not.
THEN you will all write a short written response to what happened; I will have prompts that you will choose from and respond to. So there is a short written part at the end of the Roleplaying.
DISCUSS THE TWO GAMES WE CREATE IN CLASS BELOW, communicate with group members, and/or ask to join a group.
THE GAMES:
VIDEO GAME #1: “Dead Maui II”
Premise: A Team of Olympic athletes crashes on Maui and must fight against indigenous people and other scary things to survive.
Main Characters: Bruce Jenner, Michael Owens, Nancy Kerrigan, Usain Bolt
Game Play: RPG – multiplayer – Co-op Mode
COMPLAINTS: Vulgar, profanity, skimpy bathing suits, nudity, and the
Rating too low according to some people (it should be rated M for Mature but is rated E for everone).
Video Game #2: “Holy Moly” (for younger players)
Premise: This is an Adventure game where you catch moles out of their holes. Players are called Hunters and you choose weapons to kill the moles (knives, clubs, guns, grenades). There is the Girl Scout level and the Boy Scout Level.
Names of moles: Molester Mole, Speedy Mole, Drunken Mole
COMPLAINTS: Molester mole wins too often; Speedy is not fast but speedy in negative ways. Drunken mole is always sober.
IN YOUR GROUP: Everyone needs a NAME and/or TITLE and a CONNECTION TO THE SITUATION. Every person will speak at the meeting. Each person needs a different story to tell. Plan your group’s strategy, and FILL IN THE BLANKS WITH DETAILS AND “FACTS”
My Job introduces the image of the character of the video game#2, You need to give full play to your imagination to describe the character’s appearance, character and life experience. ONLY VIDEO GAME #2 HOLY MOLY!!!
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!