Subject | Nursing |
Topic | Week 7 |
Type | RN-BSN Discussion Assignment |
Writer level | University |
Style | APA |
Sources / references | 2 |
Language | English(URN-BSN Discussion Assignment.S.) |
Description / paper instructions:
Please see the attached documents and follow instructions.
Week 7 Discussion Please read the story in the following link and follow the directions below: https://www.cdc.gov/globalhivtb/who-we-are/features/tbpreventivetherapy.html Provide a “brief” summary of the story. Identify and discuss the *global partnerships that contributed to the success of the endeavor. Include which sustainable goal is addressed with this effort or organization. Then, respond to the following questions
Please ensure you are following the discussion rubric and including a nursing, scholarly journal article in addition to your text book as sources of support. * Global Partnership Examples: Foreign governments and ministries of health U.S. government agencies The World Health Organization International organizations Academic institutions Foundations Nongovernmental organizations Faith-based organizations Businesses and other private organizations References:
|
https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
RN-BSN Discussion Guideline and Rubric
Please read the requirements of the discussion criteria thoroughly and carefully. Download and/or Print for personal use.
RN-BSN Discussion Assignment
The discussion grade includes attendance, participation, and content
Initial Attendance
RN-BSN Discussion Assignment
Initial student attendance in each course will be documented through the student’s completion of the course
certification, pre-test, and introduction, which is required to be completed within the first three (3) days of the course. Failure to log into the course and post within the first three days will result in a recorded absence. A student’s failure to attend during that time frame may result in administrative withdrawal from the course.
General Attendance
Learners in online courses must post to the discussion boards with at least three substantive posts on three different days every week to meet attendance requirements. Students are expected to communicate directly with the course instructor regarding any circumstance that may result in their absence. Absence is defined as not fulfilling any of the above requirements and failure to post initial discussion responses by Thursday of each week. Due to the nature of some discussions, instructors may not allow students to post in advance or after the week’s end without prior approval. Forgiveness of absences, grade deductions, or acceptance of late assignments due to any circumstance is up to the discretion of the instructor. Each week’s posting deadline for all posts is Sunday at 11:59 pm ET.
Participation:
Participation is not the same as attendance. Course participation is met through discussion postings and submission of assignments including quizzes/exams/weekly summaries by required due dates. Participation level is determined by the instructor and will be evaluated throughout the week. Additional point deductions may apply.
Content:
Initial responses require the use of a scholarly nursing journal article to support the student’s own ideas and that of the nursing community in addition to the required textbook. “Scholarly” is defined as a full-text, peer-reviewed nursing journal article published within the last 5 years. If the article is considered a “classic”, “foundational to nursing”, or there is a “lack of current research” for the concept, articles older than 5 years can be utilized. If older articles are utilized, the student should be prepared to defend to the instructor and/or class, why the article was considered and used as support. Discussion of individual experiences related to the topic is encouraged.
Academic Honesty:
It is expected that student’s will do their own work and properly paraphrase, cite, and reference any content from other sources including the course text book when creating their discussion responses. Students are encouraged to view Keiser University’s plagiarism policy as it relates to academic honesty. Students may not use posts that they have used previously in the same course or from their other courses. This is considered self-plagiarism and is strictly prohibited.
Plagiarism: The deliberate or unintentional use of another’s words or ideas without proper citation for which the student claims authorship. It is a policy of Keiser University that students assume responsibility for maintaining honesty in all work submitted for credit and in any other work designated by an instructor of a course. Students may not submit the same work completed for one course in any other course, earning credit for the same work each time. Plagiarism, because it is a form of theft and dishonesty that interferes with the goals of education, must carry severe penalties. These penalties can be found in the Keiser University Undergraduate Catalog, Academic Honesty Policy.
ANY occurrences of academic dishonesty or plagiarism will result in a zero grade for the entire week’s discussion grade.
DISCUSSION GRADING RUBRIC
RN-BSN Discussion Assignment
Criteria | Criteria Description | Exemplary (A) | Above Average (B) | Average (C) | Failure (D-F) | ||||||||||||||
90-100% | 80-89% | 70-79% | 0-69% | ||||||||||||||||
Initial Posts: | Initial posts must | Initial posts include | Initial posts include | Initial posts include | Initial posts did | ||||||||||||||
Use of scholarly | include a current | strong and | supportive nursing | nursing scholarly | not include a | ||||||||||||||
nursing journal | nursing scholarly | appropriate nursing | scholarly journal | journal articles or | nursing scholarly | ||||||||||||||
articles and APA | journal article | scholarly journal | articles paraphrased, | other source and was | journal article or | ||||||||||||||
(25) | paraphrased, cited, | articles substantively | cited, and referenced | paraphrased, cited, | were not | ||||||||||||||
and referenced in | and accurately | appropriately but | and referenced with | paraphrased | |||||||||||||||
APA format in | paraphrased, cited, | exhibit minor gaps in | major gaps in clarity | with any clear | |||||||||||||||
addition to the | and referenced that | clarity of content or | of content or | understanding. | |||||||||||||||
required textbook. | clearly supports the | accuracy of APA. | accuracy of APA. | Other sources | |||||||||||||||
discussion topic with | Includes reference | May or may not | may have been | ||||||||||||||||
excellent APA format | from textbook. | include reference | present with or | ||||||||||||||||
in addition to the | from textbook. | without proper | |||||||||||||||||
required text. | APA | ||||||||||||||||||
citations/referen | |||||||||||||||||||
ces. May or may | |||||||||||||||||||
not include | |||||||||||||||||||
reference from | |||||||||||||||||||
textbook. | |||||||||||||||||||
Responses to | All responses to | All responses to | Most all responses to | Some responses to | None or a couple | ||||||||||||||
Peers: | peers must include | peers include a | peers include a | peers include a | responses to | ||||||||||||||
Use of scholarly | a minimum of one | professional source | professional source | professional source | peers include a | ||||||||||||||
articles or other | (1) professional | substantively and | paraphrased, cited, and | paraphrased, cited, | professional | ||||||||||||||
sources and APA | source AND at least | accurately | referenced | and referenced with | source | ||||||||||||||
(25) | one peer response | paraphrased, cited, | appropriately with only | or without gaps in | paraphrased, | ||||||||||||||
must include a | and referenced that | some minor gaps in | clarity of content or | cited, and | |||||||||||||||
scholarly journal | clearly supports the | clarity of content or | accuracy of APA. | referenced with | |||||||||||||||
article paraphrased | peer discussion | accuracy of APA. | May or may not | or without gaps | |||||||||||||||
cited, and | response with | Includes at least one | include a scholarly | in clarity of | |||||||||||||||
referenced. (Sources | excellent APA | scholarly journal | journal article. | content or | |||||||||||||||
can include | format. Includes at | article. | accuracy of APA. | ||||||||||||||||
scholarly articles | least one scholarly | ||||||||||||||||||
from nursing or | journal article. | ||||||||||||||||||
other relevant | |||||||||||||||||||
disciplines, ANA | |||||||||||||||||||
Essential texts, | |||||||||||||||||||
professional web | |||||||||||||||||||
sites, or the course | |||||||||||||||||||
text. The use of web | |||||||||||||||||||
sites such as | |||||||||||||||||||
Wikipedia or a non- | |||||||||||||||||||
discipline | |||||||||||||||||||
supportive website | |||||||||||||||||||
are not allowed) | |||||||||||||||||||
Content Quality | Discussion | Addresses all | Addresses most | Addresses some | Presents only | ||||||||||||||
and Critical | responses are | aspects/components | aspects/components of | aspects/components | superficial | ||||||||||||||
Thinking (35) | comprehensive and | of the discussion | the discussion | of the discussion | knowledge with | ||||||||||||||
relate directly to the | question. | question. Selectively, | question. Minimally | no real analysis, | |||||||||||||||
weekly topic by | Comprehensively and | analyzes, synthesizes, | analyzes, synthesizes, | synthesis, or | |||||||||||||||
exploring the | accurately analyzes, | or evaluates the | or evaluates the | evaluation of the | |||||||||||||||
various aspects | synthesizes, or | selected topic and | selected topic with | topic. | |||||||||||||||
(details) through | evaluates the | related aspects with | major gaps in | ||||||||||||||||
discussing or | selected topic and | minor gaps in | comprehensiveness, | ||||||||||||||||
debating and adding | related aspects | accuracy, or clarity. |
RN-BSN Discussion Assignment
to the content with | applying knowledge, | comprehensiveness, | |||||||
textbook and/or | experiences, and | accuracy, or clarity. | |||||||
other citations for | presenting a clear | ||||||||
support. Responses | understanding of the | ||||||||
show evidence of | week’s concepts. | ||||||||
analysis, synthesis, | |||||||||
or evaluation of | |||||||||
topic and related | |||||||||
concepts. | |||||||||
Analysis – | |||||||||
understanding | |||||||||
organizational | |||||||||
structure by | |||||||||
breaking down the | |||||||||
parts of the | |||||||||
concepts: | |||||||||
relationships and | |||||||||
principles | |||||||||
Synthesis -putting | |||||||||
things together to | |||||||||
form a whole: | |||||||||
concept building | |||||||||
Evaluation -ability | |||||||||
to judge the value | |||||||||
of the material | |||||||||
being presented. | |||||||||
Professionalism | Student addresses | Addressed | Most posts addressed | Some postings | Postings did not | ||||
(10) | classmates and/or | students/Instructor | students/Instructor by | addressed | reflect | ||||
Instructor by name | by name for all posts. | name. Tone and | students/Instructor | professionalism | |||||
and is respectful of | Tone and responses | responses are | by name. Some | requirements | |||||
others’ ideas and | are respectful and | respectful and | postings may not | effectively. | |||||
opinions. Responds | engaging. Responded | engaging. Responded | reflect | ||||||
to questions asked | to all questions | to all questions posed | professionalism. May | ||||||
by instructor or | posed by | by Instructor/peers (if | or may not | ||||||
peers (if question is | Instructor/peers | question was posed by | responded to | ||||||
posed by Saturday | (even if question was | Saturday). | questions posed by | ||||||
of the course week). | posed on Sunday). | Instructor/peers. | |||||||
Writing | Uses proper | Postings are very well | Postings are mostly | Postings are | Writing | ||||
Conventions (5) | sentence structure | written in scholarly | well written with minor | generally poorly | conventions are | ||||
and paragraphing | style with excellent | errors in writing | written with major | non-conformant | |||||
including accurate | writing conventions. | conventions. | errors in writing | in consistency | |||||
spelling, | conventions making | and accuracy | |||||||
punctuation, | the content difficult | making the | |||||||
capitalization, | to understand or | presentation | |||||||
grammar, and a | follow. | unreadable. | |||||||
professional tone. | |||||||||
Attendance and | Each Initial post to | If all attendance and | Compliance deductions | N/A | N/A | ||||
Participation | the required | participation | are taken off manually | ||||||
Requirements | discussion threads | requirements are | from the graded | ||||||
are made on or | met, no deductions | discussion rubric raw | |||||||
before Thursday | to overall grade are | score. | |||||||
11:59 PM ET of each | imposed. | Compliance | |||||||
course week. | Deductions are as | ||||||||
follows: | |||||||||
A minimum of two | -5 each late initial post | ||||||||
(2) responses to |
https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow