Reagan and Singer agree that animals deserve the same moral consideration

April 24, 2020

Reagan and Singer agree that animals deserve the same moral consideration as humans

Order ID 53563633773

Type Essay: Reagan and Singer agree that animals deserve the same moral consideration as humans

Writer Level Masters

Style APA

Sources/References 4

Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

When responding to your peers, consider what Singer and/or Regan would say in response to their remarks, think about whether what a peer calls a non-utilitarian consideration might be, after all, a utilitarian one, or vice versa, or think of strengths and weaknesses in their argument that they might not have considered. This should be done in 100 words or more.

Reagan and Singer agree that animals deserve the same moral consideration as humans. They believe that Humans are not superior to animals simply because the majority of us have higher brain function that the majority of animals. These two however have very different reasoning representing their views. Singer being the true Utilitarian takes the approach of analyzing the basic understanding that all humans are created equal. This is the foundation that we make our human rights laws.

Reagan and Singer agree that animals deserve the same moral consideration as humans

His point is there is no one characteristic that makes all humans equal. All people are different with different emotions, physical characteristics, brain power, and abilities. So the difference that I might have from a seven foot tall basketball player that graduated from Harvard could be comparable to the differences I would have from a primate. So with all physical, mental, and emotional issues created equal then animals would be equal to humans as well.

This is a very straight forward and scientific analysis of the reasoning we already use to distribute “the good” throughout the world. Based on this logic “the good” would take animal suffering into consideration equally to humans. Regan takes a more emotional approach to this question. His point is that a wrong act is a wrong act regardless of how it is used.

By testing shampoo on a baby gorilla it has the same moral implications as if we did the same with an infant child. In my opinion this approach doesn’t so much apply to animal equality, as it applies to eradicating torture in all its forms. If I was to pull the legs off of an ant, even though ants don’t have a nervous system to feel pain, it would be considered the same as pulling the legs off my own child.

This approach Regan uses doesn’t take into account suffering as a quantifier. With suffering being the negative attribute in torture itself how can “good” be defined if there is no recognition of bad. A utilitarian view takes into account the “greatest good”, Regan’s view applies only to acts and not how they are received.

So if these “acts” are against the animals will, but create no dissatisfaction Regan would have you think of them as just the same as if the animal’s life were in danger. A utilitarian view of the same scenario would be, because there is no bad being done to the animal, the good of the product being tested outweighs the negative the animal is experiencing.

Reagan and Singer agree that animals deserve the same moral consideration as humans

RUBRIC

Quality of Response No Response Poor/Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent

Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.

Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6^th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6^th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6^th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6^th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.

Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.

Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6^th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6^th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6^th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6^th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.

GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER

CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow

Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!