Questions about Psychosocial Crisis and Extrinsic Motivation
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Week 3 Assignment – Conflicting Viewpoints Essay: Part 1
The prewriting paper (Part 1) is due this week, and the essay (Part 2) is due in Week 5.
Overview
When looking for information on a particular topic, how frequently do you try to fight biases toward your own point of view?
By playing the “Believing Game,” you will be able to practice this facet of critical thinking. The Believing Game is about attempting to “believe,” or at the very least evaluate, the grounds for competing viewpoints on a certain topic.Instructions
You looked at the biases covered in Chapter 2 of the webtext and discussed one of the themes from Pros & Cons of Controversial Issues in Week 2 Discussion. You may use the same or a different topic from this discussion:
Choose a topic from the Pros & Cons of Controversial Issues area, declare your viewpoint on the issue, and pick three premises (reasons) mentioned under either the Pro or Con sectionwhichever part opposes your position.
Answer these “believing” questions proposed by Elbow for the three premises (reasons) that challenge your position on the issue:
What’s fascinating or useful in this view?
What would I notice if I subscribed to this point of view?
In what sense or under what circumstances may this be true?
Read the excerpt about critical thinking processes: The Believing Game [PDF] and How to Make Divergent Opinions More Fruitful
Prewriting allows you to analyse your thoughts.
Guidelines for clear and orderly writing should be followed in the paper:
An introductory paragraph and a conclusion paragraph should be included.
In body paragraphs, use a topic sentence and supporting sentences to address the important topics.
Follow basic English language, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling norms.
There is no page requirement for this prewriting project.
There is no necessity to provide references in the assignment at this time.
Strayer Writing Standards are required for this course. Please see the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course for help and information. Any additional instructions should be sought from your lecturer.
The following is the specific course learning result linked to this assignment:
Discuss the Week 5 Assignment – Opposing Points of View. Part 2 of the essayOVERVIEW
How often do you strive to avoid biases toward your own point of view when looking for information on a certain topic?
This task requires you to practice this type of critical thinking.INSTRUCTIONS
Write a 34 page paper in which you: State your position on the conflicting viewpoints topic you chose in Week 3’s homework. Part 1 of the essay
Choose three premises (reasons) from the Pros & Cons of Controversial Issues that support your position and explain why you chose these particular reasons.
Explain your answers to the “believing” questions in Pros & Cons of Controversial Issues regarding the three premises that oppose your position.
Examine at least two forms of biases you may have encountered while weighing the arguments for and against your position.
Examine how your own enculturation or sense of belonging to a community may have influenced your biases.
Even if your viewpoint on the problem hasn’t changed, discuss whether your thinking about the matter has changed as a result of playing the “Believing Game.”
Guidelines for clear and orderly writing should be followed in the paper:
An introductory paragraph and a conclusion paragraph should be included.
In body paragraphs, use a topic sentence and supporting sentences to address the important topics.
Follow basic English language, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling norms.
Use four sources to back up your claims. Choose sources that are reliable, timely, and relevant. At least once in your assignment, cite each source included on your source page. Access the library or consult the library guides for assistance with research, writing, and citation.
Strayer Writing Standards are required for this course. Please see the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course for help and information. Any additional instructions should be sought from your lecturer.
The following is the specific course learning result linked to this assignment:
Examine the biases inherent in a certain issue’s premise evaluation.
Premises relating to a point of view on a certain topic.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!