Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing Models of Therapy Treatment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Course: Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing – Models of Therapy Treatment
PLEASE NOTE I AM A PSCYHIATRIC MENTAL HEALTH NURSE PRACTITIONER STUDENT WHICH MEANS I AM ALREADY A NURSE WHO IS GOING FOR A MASTERS TO BE A PROVIDER TO PSYCHIATRIC PATIENTS
GUIDELINES for Final Paper
Course Objective: ( See syllabus)
Articulate an understanding of the evidence for application of psychotherapy models to specific clients’ problems/disorders and culture
Paper Guidelines (8 -10 pages) (40 % of grade)
Develop a paper on the effectiveness of psychotherapy models for a specific disorder. The disorder can be depression ( in general or one type of depression); anxiety (or a specific anxiety disorder such as phobias), eating disorders (anorexia or bulimia) ; substance use disorders, etc.
The paper should specify in the introduction, the disorder and its definition, and usual symptoms, and the types and names of psychotherapy models found to be effective in its treatment (literature search, may be 3 or 4 models) . Cite the most convincing research : describe the sample, data collection, findings and conclusion of at least-four published studies. The studies may be ( but do not have to be ) on the same model; however, the research should be on one specific disorder. Critique each study—are these strong studies on effectiveness.? What are the studies’ limitations ?
NOTE TYPE OF THERAPIES ARE
Interpersonal therapy – IPT(focused, brief), (Brief Time Limited Dynamic Therapy) BTLDT, Cognitive CBT, Brief Solution Focused Therapy or Motivational Interviewing
Explain why the studies chosen support a specific model’s use. For example, has cognitive therapy for eating disorders been shown to be more effective than psychodynamic models because of the symptom of dichotomous thinking. Are there cultural implications that effect the model’s effectiveness?
Finally, describe the implications for your practice.
Format /Organization of Paper
Introduction :
- Disorder Defined
- Models commonly used, (This could be theory, expert opinion, as well as research publications) for the disorder
- Models cited on effectiveness for the disorder in your literature search (might be several)
Body of Paper
- Introduce this section
- Cited Research and description on the Effectiveness of specific models (4 studies) for the disorder you have chosen with critique of the study
- Do the findings conclude the model plus pharmacology is the most effective? Psychotherapy alone? Cultural Implications of the model’s use?
Implications for Your Practice
Summary of Paper and /or Conclusions
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Rubric (40% of course grade)
- Ability to present thesis or position by way of introduction 5%
- Ability to analyze and synthesize research 20%
- Current and significant literature used 5%
- Implications for practice 5%
- Writing Style (APA Format) 5%
Please utlize these sources along with a couple others.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders,
(5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author (previous courses)
Dewan, M.J,. Steenbarger, B. N. & Greenberg, R.P. (2018) .The art and science of brief
psychotherapies (3 rd edition). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association (streaming
video see guide and access in front of book, pages xiii-xvi
Gelso, CJ (2019). The therapeutic relationship in psychotherapy practice. NY :Routledge
Wheeler, K. (2014). Psychotherapy for the advanced practice psychiatric nurse, 2 nd edition,
New York: Springer Publishing Company.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!