Proposal Memo for a Home Try-On Market Concept Test
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
You work for Warby Parker as a communication professional, reporting to co-CEO David Gilboa. Respond to the following task using the abilities you’ve been practicing in this course:
You’re assisting Gilboa in the preparation of a company report. The report will be a “public business plan,” according to Gilboa, because it will explain the company and its aims, strategies, and operations without releasing the type of secret information that a conventional business plan does. Potential investors, employees, and business partners make up the secondary audience.
To help overcome shoppers’ apprehensions about purchasing eyewear online, Warby Parker has been trialing a concept called Home Try-On, in which people in the South Florida test market can order five pairs of frames, keep them for five days at no cost, and then decide which pair to order and which to return. This allows customers to try on the frames they’re interested in and get feedback from family and friends.
While on the job (Internal, Unsolicited Proposal)
Write a 2-3 page internal message to Mr. Gilboa with your evaluation of the test market results and your advice for how the company should proceed with this concept based on those results. Remember to use headings or subheadings to clarify each section of the proposal, such as Background, Solution, Recommendation, and so on. Make sure you appropriately identify and assess your target audience, as well as any secondary audiences that may exist. Remember that Mr. Gilboa, the person to whom you submit your suggestion, has the authority to order the recommended change to be implemented.It’s critical that you write this memo with your own ideas and comments. You have the ability to make the test market experience positive or negative, and then base your advice on that. Make up any data and information you need to support your case; in the real world, you’d have this kind of data and information before writing this memo.
Here’s an illustration: A rough outline for a positive recommendation is as follows:
Test of the Home Try-On Market Concept
Background: As you are aware, profits are down, shop rents are rising, and the general public perceives us as an old-fashioned, undynamic corporation. Is the answer to be found on the internet? In November of last year, marketing came up with the notion of Home Try-On and began testing it in South Florida.
Risks Assumed Prior to the Market Test: Is the concept too perplexing for the general public? What if the four pairs of frames that buyers didn’t want were not returned? What kind of breakage can you expect? Is the cost of postage and handling prohibitive?
Test Market Outcomes: The notion appeared to be well received by the general public. There are a lot of orders. They had a 98 percent return rate on the four pairs they did not want. There was almost no breakage. Because the consumer had to agree to absorb these fees in advance, shipping and handling costs were kept to a minimum.Recommendation: Extend the test market for another four months across the whole East Coast. If the findings of that test are also favorable, get ready to go national.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!