Princess Diana was Assassinated Believe
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Sources: 7Subject: OtherTopic: Believe: Princess Diana was assassinatedPaper details:
1. Research the background information about the conspiracy theory. 2. Research the rationale and/or motivation for the conspiracy theory. 3. Research the reasons in support of the conspiracy theory. 4. Research the reasons that undermine the theory, including contrary evidence and sound alternative theories/explanations. STEP 2: LOGICAL ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION OF THE EVIDENCE – Gather your research into a logically organized slide presentation. The slide presentation must use proper citations and include a work referenced slide. Your slide presentation must be submitted on Canvas with an audio and/or video recording of your presentation.
This project must include 15 – 20 slides and be roughly 10 minutes long. Your presentation will focus on Vaughn’s TEST formula and criteria of adequacy (Vaughn, Chapter 9) and adhere to the following structure. 1. Title: Include a title slide with the name of the presentation and the student’s name. This is the first slide of the presentation. 2. Introduction: Briefly introduce the conspiracy theory by including any helpful background information or history. You may also want to include some fun facts about the theory. 3. Analysis of the Facts: Use the TEST formula and the criteria of adequacy to analyze the conspiracy theory (see Vaughn, Chapter 9 – especially pgs. 327 – 348).
a. State the theory and check for consistency i. Clearly state what the conspiracy theory is meant to explain and what’s motivating the theory. ii. Does the conspiracy theory meet the minimum requirement for consistency? Clearly state why or why not. b. Assess the evidence for the theory i. Clearly state and explain the evidence for the conspiracy theory? Please enumerate the evidence one by one. ii. Provide a general assessment of the facts. c. Scrutinize alternative theories i. Identify one plausible alternative theory that also accounts for the evidence. ii. Clearly state how this alternative theory accounts for the evidence and whether there are any perceived shortcomings in its account of the facts.
d. Test the theories with the criteria of adequacy – evaluate both the conspiracy theory and the alternative theory according to the criteria of adequacy. i. Testability – Is the theory testable? How or why not? ii. Fruitfulness – Is theory beneficial or useful? How or why not? iii. Scope – Does the theory explain the facts? How many? How well? iv. Simplicity – Does the theory make any unsubstantiated assumptions? Does the theory provide a clear and clean explanation of the facts without making logical leaps? Why or why not? v. Conservatism – Does the theory cohere with your background knowledge? Is the theory consistent with what you know about the world and “well- established” facts? Why or why not?
4. Assessment of the Facts: What’s your final verdict? After considering the evidence, a good critical thinker has three options. (1) believe, (2) doubt or reject, (3) suspend judgement. Conclude by providing an overall assessment of which one of these options is best for the theories you considered and why you think this option is best in light of the facts. 5. Works Referenced: Include a works referenced slide as the final slide of your presentation. This will include a list of ALL sources that you referenced during your research, paying particular attention to those sources you cited during your presentation.\
Princess Diana was Assassinated Believe
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!