Prepare a report on intelligence Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Prepare a report on intelligence Assignment
***The terrorist organisation is known as the IRA (Irish Republican Army)***, and its history is unknown at this time.
4th Essay
You will write an intelligence report based on a specified intelligence query for this project. It is up to you to frame and articulate your understanding of the intelligence issue in your submission. To support your study, you’ll need to gather existing open sources and data.What are the stories that motivate your selected terrorist or hate group? (And/or) What is your group’s media strategy?
(You may write on one or both of the questions.) Have you noticed a shift in storylines or media consumption?)
Grading
The ability to rapidly and clearly communicate answers to intelligence inquiries in one page or less of substance is what we’re working on here. Format:Title
BLUF
*In-text citations using Zotero as evidence (citation management)
Conclusion
Bibliographical information (may go on to second page)
single line spacing
Here are some broad guidelines for your report:
Make sure your paper starts with a BLUF (bottom line up front). Simply answer the question and explain why it’s significant in a sentence or two. It is frequently preferable to conduct research and locate reference before composing a BLUF.
The body of the paper should only provide evidence that supports the BLUF. You don’t have the real estate for historical background in a report this brief, hence these are short reports. If you absolutely must provide context, do so in one or two phrases. Extraneous material weakens your argument and makes it difficult to follow your judgement. Imagine briefing a senior policymaker on the question they asked you in three minutes or less. What must you include in order to convey your point?
Make your grammar and structure as simple as possible. The style of intelligence writing is straightforward and straightforward. We frequently discuss our findings with foreign intelligence agencies or non-native English speakers. In your writing, avoid run-on phrases, passive voice, and tense mixing. Use the simple past tense to describe events that happened in the past. It’s difficult to understand conditional present continuous (for example, “ISIS would be gathering support for the next four years”). Please make the event sequence as obvious as possible, even if your grammar is technically perfect.
Your conclusion should follow logically from the evidence you’ve presented. In the end, do not introduce completely new notions. Maintain a strong grip. Explain why the evidence you presented is important, intriguing, concerning, or predictive in some way. This is your data evaluation. What value do you provide to the reporting as an analyst? It doesn’t have to be life-changing. Perhaps you’re emphasizing the fact that there are several grievances rather than a single source of dissatisfaction. Perhaps you’ve demonstrated how the grievances have changed over time. Perhaps the objectives have shifted. This evaluation should be mentioned in your BLUF (briefly!). This is another reason why composing the BLUF at the end of your writing process is often preferable.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!