Plate & Gems Tectonics Diamonds Plate Tectonics Discussion on Google Scholar
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
You used to think of Google as a dependable source of information two weeks ago. This week, we’ll look at Google Scholar, one of my favorite research tools. Google Scholar provides academic publications that are more reputable than a Google search for information; but, they will be more difficult to read without prior knowledge. Google Scholar can be found by putting scholar.google.com (Links to an external site.) into your browser’s search box (or by clicking the link).
You’ll start by watching a video on the library’s streaming services:
To get to the ELAC library home page, go to the Library tab on the Canvas course navigation (on the left-hand menu) or google the ELAC library.
On the library page, there is a list of resources on the left side of the page, such as “Find Books and Media.”
Select “Streaming Video” from the drop-down menu.
Choose “Films on Demand.” You can use this site to explore a wide range of topics, find excerpts from educational videos, and even watch whole educational films.
“GemStone Geology” is a keyword you can use to find more information.
Choose the first video that appears and watch it (4:52).
Prepare yourself to respond to the following questions.
Please provide the following information in response to this prompt:
Part One:
After seeing this video, you will have a better understanding of how minerals can be used to learn about the history of plate tectonics on Earth. When do experts believe plate tectonics began, based on the video? What makes them believe that?
Part Two:Find a scientific publication on this topic using Google Scholar.
Go to Google Scholar and type “diamonds plate tectonics” into the search box.Examine the results of your search. In the titles and short summaries, look for significant terms. Do any of the publications appear to discuss the beginning of plate tectonics?
Examine the titles and publication dates of the publications. Science, Geology, Nature, and other respected and trustworthy publications are also available. To get your paper published in one of these journals, you must submit it for peer review and editing. The science will be more up-to-date the more recent the year of publication.
Take a look at the authors of the articles now. Do any of these look familiar? SB Shirey, the scientist in the movie, is the author of the third article down, “Start of the Wilson cycle at 3 Ga revealed by diamonds from the subcontinental mantle (Links to an external site.)”
“E-Resources at ELAC,” a link to the right of Shirey’s article, should be clicked. This will take you to an article copy. (Alternatively, you can use the link provided above.)
What publication did Shirey’s piece appear in? What year did it come out? Take a look at the article’s abstract. Make a list of the words in the abstract that you are unfamiliar with. Look up one of these words and explain what it means to your classmates.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!