Philosophy of Management Essay Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Philosophy of Management
-Please answer the following two questions in 2-3 pages each (so 4-6 pages total). Please be sure that your responses conform to the formatting guidelines.
-You only can cite the materials I attached. you may not use outside supplementary material to support your argument. So, the only sources reference you can use are the attached files.
– You have to read the class note below, I attached note for question one and I will provide you the second note soon. You have to read the reading attachment first, then the note to understand what is the note about.
– Do not type the question again just mention the number of each question
Formatting Guidelines
The formatting guidelines are as follows:
type-written in 12 pt. Times New Roman font?
double-spaced
have 1 inch top and bottom and 1.25 inch left and right margins?
written on 8.5×11 inch paper
stapled
Despite being called The Art of War, Sun Tzus text in fact advances a pacifist thesis. What are the different strategies through which Sun Tzu advises military commanders to avoid conflict? What sorts of knowledge do these strategies require?
How does Plato define the philosopher-king? What is it, exactly, that the philosopher-king knows that others do not, and how does the content of the philosopher-kings knowledge stand in relation to other forms of knowing and existing??
class note for question 1: Sun Tzu, The Art of War
-What makes a leader a good leader??
-Leadership is about principles and how you can understand the way to do it and make things as good as it can be and one of the way is the moral law?
-The five elements of strategy?
-market competition is war
– how to defeat an enemy
-what is art of war is about? what is the project of the art of war?
-the project can be two different questions
1) what kind of knowledge is necessary in order to lead a state, what do you need to know, how do you need to know it, in what way does knowledge work, what kind of relationship between the mind and the body when you say I know something
– you have to know and train things in such a way that mind forgets and the body remember
2) a question of organization that to say how is it that before the fight/ conflict begins, you have all the thing that need to be organized in such a way that you can be sure of victory even if that victory looks like no fighting at all (if you know yourself and your enemy you can be sure of victory of any case) (how well you know the world, yourself and your enemy in the world and how well you have organized yourself based on that knowledge) (you have information that the other guy does not) (how can you never be deceived about yourself or other)
Strategic knowledge: is always framed by a goal or an end that may or may not be external to it (that to say it may or may not be Instrumental knowledge). Also, it involves overcome resistance/obstacles. Strategic knowledge sometimes is Instrumental knowledge
Instrumental knowledge: is knowledge in which the end or goal is external to the process of knowing, Instrumental knowledge has external relationship between the goal and the process.?
-to know yourself and your enemy is such a way that you minimize the resistance as much as possible.
– organization related to strategic knowledge but not the same thing, and has to do with some problems which is the basic human condition that exposed to potential
three entities that is exposed to…..?
the leader/ the leader body habits/practices
the polis/political community
the army /martial force?
5 elements to every process of strategic thinking
???1-the way
2-heaven/ weather
3-earth/terrain
4- commander/leadership
5-Method/discipline.
Virtue:?
1)knowledge?
2)organization
Strategic knowledge: being that knowledge to allowed someone to overcome resistance/obstacles. Strategic knowledge is kind of knowledge one’s developed if trying to win hand to hand comeback. Strategic knowledge allows to come over resistance come from an enemy.?
Strategic knowledge is about principles not intuition. the way in which someone apply certain principles
Sun Tzu said: if I know with precision how things stand in both said with all 5 of these 5 elements of strategic knowledge/ category I can know with certainty who will win the conflict
5 elements of strategic knowledge also the 5 possible sources of destruction, the 5 sources of resistance that you have to be overcome and each one have different kind of shape?
??1-the way
2-heaven/ weather
3-earth/terrain
4- commander/leadership
5-Method/discipline.
Instrumental knowledge: knowledge to allowed someone achieve some external end. goal oriented knowledge.
What is the different between leading someone when you are fighting flourishing?
Good leader character, what makes character a character
The character of a person is formed in the development of Virtue, that is to say all characters have their component part Virtue
Virtue basically means a capacity, if Im virtuous person it means Im a capable person, if you’re capacity is bigger you’re becoming more capable than you are developing a strong character
Sun Tzu trying to remove the conflict, how do we organize ourselves is such a way, how to we come ourselves that we never have to fight at all
the second chapter is all about this
-humanism was universalism.?
-Sun Tzu: who is kind of humanist that one once except the fact that humanity is accomplishment, in order to be good people we have to pacify certain conflict.?
-conflict begin in the body of the leaders themselves.?
-trying to overcome the resistance that come from human condition itself
– Sun Tzu: distraction do not get distracted and do not be deceived by the situation by which you find yourself, the great enemy of the character of the leader is destruction becoming obsessed with one emotion becoming obsessed of one detail of the situation.?
-Sun Tzu: do not be deceived do lose touch with the reality where you find yourself.?
Chapter 4:?
– the intern Chinese commentator in the text: the way we think about organization in any particular contacts is it something like the mountain or the channel, the mountain which rock rolls or the channel which water flows
– the channel of someone energy in the formation of character and the martial capacity of one’s organization.
– changing shape into a question of how to be rock
– two elements – water which flows and rock which rolls
-water shapes
-Sun Tzu: being water is way of avoiding conflict or moving around conflict.
– CHAPTER 2 Doing Battle: is a kind of argument being made about we do not want perseverance, we want victory.
– perseverance is a bad thing we do not want perseverance and you should not engage in it for a long time, doing battle is defined by speed, speed is the value is want we want to do, move quickly and fast.
– OODA loop
-Sun Tzu: winning is just another name for slightly less severe if lost.
winning a Battle is not a good thing, we do not like winning or losing because we do not like war at all.
– assessed disadvantages before advantages, where am i weak where other weaknesses not where am i strong. need to control strength and think of weakness and incapacity. and where your enemy have disadvantages to avoid long struggle.
chapter 3:
the things someone want to Attack
1- the enemy plan – Attack someone capacity for knowledge
2-alliances – going after someone alliances and make sure no one going to safe the enemy
3-army – if the above falls I Attack the army itself
4- city – Attack the people
-Sun Tzu: this is the issue, how to win a fight when leaving as much as possible of the 4 point above intact. how to avoid destroying all the resources of capacity that the other has.
chapter 4:
formation: what are you able to control, formation of one character is always a question of where are your weaknesses. weaknesses is understood as an access, how to not loss my way and end up becoming absorb in a conflict and lose control of the formation of my character
-virtue between two poles either side of it two weaknesses, a weakness of access and a weakness of deficiency.
The five strategic factors in chapter one:
??1-the way
2-heaven/ weather
3-earth/terrain
4- commander/leadership
5-Method/discipline.
second schema that we have to consider once you have identified how you are going to approach the formation of character you become the leader you are; you have a new schema to know the specific situation in which you find yourself and its involve kind of flow?
the first step it has to be a process of measurement – estimation/assessment
measurement refer to the way to lead the schema back to the fist schema above, how do you measure your relative capacity, knowledge or situation within each of the above 5 variables. how to master the way, how your relationship with people? how that knowledge related to the organization of my forces. the meaning of what i have measured in a relation of what i wish to do and be victorious.
calculation/counting-comparison
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!