Pervasive Sexual Harassment Essay Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Pervasive Sexual Harassment Essay Assignment
the plants have not changed significantly in the last twenty years. Several women who worked at the plants in the 1990s sued the Company for pervasive sexual harassment, and in 1999, won a multimillion-dollar settlement. As the women who were members of the United Auto Workers (UAW) told the Times,
bosses and fellow laborers treated them as property or prey. Men crudely commented on their breasts and buttocks; graffiti of penises was carved into tables, spray-painted onto floors and scribbled onto walls. They groped women, pressed against them, simulated sex acts and punished those who refused (Chira and Einhorn 2017).
When one of the women asked her union representative for help in dealing with a coworker who propositioned her for oral sex, he urged her not to follow-through on her complaints because the coworker would lose his job, his benefits, and his pension. False rumors about a sexual relationship with the harasser spread in the plant, which made the woman’s work life increasing stressful. She gave up attempting to press charges when the union official told her, “Suzette, you’re a pretty woman—take it as a compliment.” Other female union members shared similar experiences (Chira and Einhorn 2017).
Fast forward twenty years, and conditions have not improved significantly for the UAW women at Ford. In August 2017, the U.S. EEOC reached a $10 million settle- ment with Ford over racial and sexual harassment allegations at the very same Chicago plants (Chira and Einhorn 2017).
Thirty women autoworkers brought a separate law- suit, which accuses union representatives of harassment and obstructing women’s complaints.6 In that lawsuit, which is still making its way through the courts, several women accuse the UAW bargaining committee chairman, Allen “Coby” Millender, of repeated assaults that include touching, grabbing, and attempts at unwanted kissing (EbossWatch 2014).
When one woman sought his help after being fired, he told her she would have to get on her knees and “act like another woman who moments before their conversation, had been pressed close to him, standing between his legs” (Chira and Einhorn 2017). Millender also threatened to move a worker to an overnight shift if she did not lunch with him in his office and have sex with him (EbossWatch 2014).
Save for the failed efforts of one steward, the union took no steps to protect the women, yet went out of its way to protect the accused harasser. When Millender received a two-week suspension following a Company investigation, the union grieved the case to arbitration. When plant rumors spread that Millender had been fired, UAW Vice President Jimmy Settles quickly took to Facebook to clarify that Millender had not been fired, only suspended and noted that “the UAW has filed a grievance chal- lenging Mr. Millender’s suspension” (Settles 2015). By contrast, the union made no statement concerning the brutal conditions that its female members were forced to endure at the hands of supervisors and union agents.
A troubling pattern emerges from these cases: a victim complains to the union, the union representative ignores her, or points her toward the employer, encouraging her to file a complaint under the employer’s sexual harassment policy. The victim then files a complaint with the employer, who, to avoid liability under Title VII, conducts
Avendaño 251
an investigation. When the employer disciplines a harasser, the union grieves the dis- cipline, forcing the victim and the employer to align in opposition to the union and the harasser. Indeed, sexual harassment grievances in labor arbitration overwhelmingly involve men challenging discipline for sexually harassing conduct (Alleyne, 1999).
Part of the problem is that most unions do not bargain clauses specific to sexual harassment but rely on general antidiscrimination clauses to cover sexual harassment. That language gives unions little guidance on how to handle harassment claims, and, given the complexity of the issue, the emotionally charged nature of harassment claims, and the internal politics that often accompany such claims, it becomes much easier for a grievance handler to simply push complaints to the employer. Canadian unions, by contrast, have taken a different approach, negotiating clauses that deal spe- cifically with harassment, and supplementing the collective bargaining language with toolkits and training to make the protections accessible (Barnacle et al. 1994).
Lurking in the background is the union’s duty of fair representation, a legal obliga- tion to treat all members of a bargaining unit fairly and not act in a manner that is “arbitrary, discriminatory, or in bad faith.”7 That duty requires that the union conduct an evaluation of the merits of a claim, and make a decision on how to proceed based on a fair and impartial consideration of the interests of members, free from political favoritism or ill will (O’melveny 2000).
Unions have substantial leeway in this area; they are not required to proceed with every grievance filed by an aggrieved member. If the union’s investigation concludes that the alleged harasser acted in a manner that violated the rules of the workplace, the union is not obligated to pursue a grievance on his behalf.
The Way Forward: Understanding the Past
To become an authentic leader in combating workplace sexual harassment, unions need to confront their past and present treatment of women. Bessie Hillman, the mili- tant labor activist proclaimed in 1961,
I have a great bone to pick with the organized labor movement. They are the greatest offender as far as discrimination against women is concerned. Today women in every walk of life have bigger positions than they have in organized labor. (Murolo and Chitty 2001)
The labor movement’s exclusion of women from leadership positions—indeed, from the movement itself—is rooted in long-standing sexism, a culture that values tradition and loyalty at the expense of other values.
Male chauvinism and a nearly exclusive focus on economic factors like wages and benefits have worked together throughout history to keep women in the labor move- ment as second-class citizens. Of the 13 founding unions of the American Federation of Labor (AFL), only two, the Typographical Union and Cigar Makers admitted women (Murolo and Chitty 2001). By the late 1890s, most AFL national affiliates amended their constitutions to allow for female membership, but found ways to keep
252 Labor Studies Journal 43(4)
women out. Even when women organized themselves, they were denied recognition. In the early 1900s, women printers in New York, candy workers in Philadelphia, hair- dressers in Seattle, and streetcar conductors in Cleveland organized and petitioned for a charter that would formally recognize them as an affiliate of the AFL. The AFL turned them down (Foner 1979; Murolo and Chitty 2001).
Nor did the AFL stand by women workers following World War I or World War II, when women entered the workforce in large numbers. Diane Balser’s (1987, 26) study of feminism in the labor movement exposes the antipathy that AFL leaders displayed against women:
Most if not all of the AFL leadership was convinced that ‘a woman’s place is in the home.’ The American Federationist, the AFL newspaper published many articles during these years condemning the presence of women in the wage workforce and demanding women’s exclusion from industry.
The UAW and United Electrical Workers (UE) pushed by Communists within their ranks adopted equal pay as the official policy of the union in bargaining; no others did (Foner 1979). Following World War II, organized labor participated in a cultural and legal consensus that married women belonged in the home, and that they should leave their jobs in the hands of returning veterans (Kessler-Harris 2001). Thus, women were displaced, with little support from government or labor. Both national centers, the AFL and the Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO), were absent.
Worse, unions sanctioned discrimination against women through collective bar- gaining. Several unions bargained prohibitions against the employment of married women. Others agreed to the discharge of single women who married. Yet others bar- gained unequal hiring of, and wage rates for, men and women doing similar jobs where lower paying jobs were given to women (Foner 1979).
Well into the 1960s and 1970s, unions sided with employers on matters that benefit- ted men at the expense of women workers, and especially women of color. Those included protective measures like weight lifting restrictions, hours limitations, and separate jobs for men and women (Crain 2007; Deslippe 2000).
The International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) maintained a provision in its contract that allowed the “son of an active deceased longshoreman” the right to join the union by “taking his father’s union book”—a provision that remained until the 1970s, when a Southern California female dock worker sued the union (Alimahomed-Wilson 2016, 158).
Labor leaders also fought vehemently to lessen liability under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act for themselves, by trying to weaken the U.S. EEOC, and diverting claims away from the courts to U.S. EEOC, for both gender and race (Crain 2007; Crain and Matheny 2001). Some unions also strongly urged the U.S. EEOC to inter- pret bona fide occupational qualifications narrowly, which would allow employers and unions to continue to discriminate based on gender and race despite the antidiscrimi- nation laws (Crain 2007; Deslippe 2000).8
Unions’ responses to sexual harassment are also shaped by a distinctive form of feminism exercised by women inside the labor movement, which focuses on women’s
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!