Part 2 of the Updated Lobbying Plan Elevator Pitch
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Consider writing a reflection.
View your own video and evaluate your communication with your stakeholders for this reflection.
Consider the following aspects of your verbal and nonverbal communication abilities:
What are the differences between the Week 3 video and the Week 2 video? What has changed?
What impact will these disparities or potential improvements have on how your stakeholders view you and the issue you’re working on?In addition, what fresh follow-up questions or remarks do you believe your audience would have after hearing your elevator pitch about your lobbying plan? What would your reaction be? Refer to resources and trustworthy online sources that you have come across either via your weekly readings in the course or in your work on the annotated bibliography in Week 2 to reinforce your responses. In APA format, cite your sources and list your references.
Ongoing Compliance Issues and Practices (Introduction)
Active continuous efforts must be in place to analyze and enhance regulatory and grant compliance procedures in order for a mental health agency or organization to remain successful. Mismanagement of grants or inability to comply with requirements can have serious financial and even criminal consequences.In addition to scholarly articles, the Grant Compliance web page of the US Department of Health and Human Services and the HCCA electronic paper Evaluating and Improving a Compliance Program will help you comprehend these concerns.
Learning Objectives
Students will be able to do the following after successfully completing this week:
Examine how a compliance program is evaluated and improved. (Aligns with CLOs 1, 2) Examine the potential conflicts that come with federal grant compliance. (Coordinates with CLOs) 3) Revise your lobbying plan’s quick, taped introduction speech. Overview (Aligns with CLOs 4)
Day 3: Assignment Due Format Value CLOs Grant Funding (1st post) Day 7 Learning Activity 4 4 Compliance Indicators and Personal Application Day 7 Learning Activity Reflection 4 1, 2 Self-Check N/A Self-Check 0 N/A Total 12 Learning Activity Discussion Forum 4 3 Updated Lobbying Plan Elevator Pitch
Resources
Required References
Anthony, D. L., Appari, A., & Johnson, M. E. (2014). Institutionalizing HIPAA compliance: Organizations and competing logics in U.S. health care. Journal of Health & Social Behavior, 55(1), 108-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146513520431
Krist, A. H., Phillips, S. M., Sabo, R. T., Balasubramanian, B. A., Heurtin-Roberts, S., Ory, M. G., & … Glasgow, R. E. (2014). Adoption, reach, implementation, and maintenance of a behavioral and mental health assessment in primary care. Annals of Family Medicine, 12(6), 525-533. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1710
Kusserow, R. P. (2014). Metrics to Evidence and Benchmark Compliance Program Effectiveness. Journal of Health Care Compliance, 16(6), 49–52. Retrieved from ebscohost.
United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2017). Grants compliance and oversight. Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/policy/compliance.htm (Links to an external site.)
Recommended References
Burrow-Sánchez, J. J., Martin, J. L., & Imel, Z. E. (2016). Applying for grant funding as a counseling psychologist: From thought to action. Counseling Psychologist, 44(4), 479-524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000015626272
Goldfried, M. R. (2016). On possible consequences of National Institute of Mental Health funding for psychotherapy research and training. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 47(1), 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000034
Merlino, J. P., Petit, J., Weisser, L., & Bowen, J. (2015). Leading with lean: Getting the outcomes we need with the funding we have. Psychiatric Quarterly, 86(3), 301-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-015-9376-0