Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Q1
Kraft Heinz has had numerous negative reviews from its employees and other organizations such as The Chicago Tribune which do not agree with their methods of operation in relation to employee treatment. The company operates under a competitive ambience where it is the most productive employee who gets rewarded. There is a negative effect on employees who always monitor their ratings to determine their possibility of getting bonuses (Elejalde-Ruiz & Trotter, 2017). Management is responsible for this culture which makes the entire organizational unfair to some employees.
Q 2
The technique of forming an organizational development relationship involves discovering issues requiring change then informing management of this, analyzing how easily management would be willing to inspire change, formulating strategies to solve issues and implementing the development changes (Hodges, 2020). The steps listed are very critical since each step considers the wellbeing of employees at Kraft Heinz. The expected effect of the new relationship would be better communication between Kraft Heinz’s employees and management. The communication would reveal proposals from all participants.
Q 3
The best technique of diagnosing situations in the organization are employee assessments and reviews (Torre, n.d.). These tools are suitable in the case of Kraft Heinz since employees are the ones directly affected by organizational issues. Employee assessments would reveal issues that affected them and their proposals for change. When employees from different departments at Kraft Heinz are placed together under supervision by a leader, the ambience shall improve the possibilities of employees to get their issues solved. Reviews conducted after assessments would ascertain whether change was implemented or not.
Q 4
The intervention I would recommend is organizational intervention (Seth, 2017) since the management policy of giving more productive employees benefits is the root cause of all issues. Kraft Heinz’s policy of benefits has always impacted negatively on employees who had minute productivity. The company has always boasted of high profits (Elejalde-Ruiz& Trotter, 2017). For this reason, their policy has always been implemented regardless of any negative impact on the workforce. The intervention I recommended would influence the company to transform its policy so that it would be more inclusive.
Q 5
There is an advantage of organizational intervention whereby productivity would be noticed in the entire organization. Kraft Heinz has the power to create and mandate policies, as such, their decision would be followed promptly by all employees. Once the company changes the benefits to be more inclusive, every employee would get motivated to improve their productivity.
The disadvantage of organizational intervention is whereby all power lies with the company. The company may then create a plan of action that suits business operations more than the employees’ needs.
Q 6
To implement the change, I would advise Kraft Heinz to apply change management (Hao & Yazdanifard, 2015) since it is an effective technique of modifying the leaders and leadership policies. It is important to understand that change is not always acceptable by organizations especially if it affects their finances. In the case of Kraft Heinz, they have had a lot of profit. For instance, the overall revenue in 2016 was $26 million (Elejalde-Ruiz & Trotter, 2017). Proposal for change in policies may cause the company to be against the change especially since they might project low profit. It is imperative to inform the company that employees would work harder once all their work is appreciated.
Q 7
I would evaluate change in the organization by preparing a checklist that was properly formed using employee analysis to determine the areas they expected change to be affected. A checklist is very effective since it shows the exact change and the response formed from an analysis.
Reference
Center for Chemical Process Safety. (2013). Guidelines for Managing Process Safety Risks During Organizational Change. doi: 10.1002/9781118530689
Elejalde-Ruiz, A., & Trotter, G. (2017). Working at Kraft Heinz means competition, cost-cutting, and for some, reward. Retrieved 6 November 2020, from https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-kraft-heinz-culture-0528-biz-20170527-story.html
Hao, M., & Yazdanifard, R. (2015). How Effective Leadership can Facilitate Change in Organizations through Improvement and Innovation. Global Journal Of Management And Business Research: A Administration And Management, 15(9). Retrieved from https://globaljournals.org/GJMBR_Volume15/1-How-Effective-Leadership.pdf
Hodges, J. (2020). Organization Development: How Organizations Change and Develop Effectively (pp. 55-160). Red Globe Press.
Seth, S. (2017). Organizational Development (OD) Interventions. Retrieved 6 November 2020, from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/organizational-development-od-interventions-satyendra-seth/
Torrez, L. Tools & Techniques to Identify Problems in the Workplace. Retrieved 6 November 2020, from https://work.chron.com/tools-techniques-identify-problems-workplace-23330.html
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!