Organizational Conflict Discussion Essay Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Organizational Conflict Discussion Essay Assignment
I’m working on a Health & Medical question and need guidance to help me study.
Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts.
Offer additional preparatory activities that may help with the negotiations for both the senior management team and the surgeons.
Describe an additional approach to reducing interpersonal conflict that your colleague may want to consider.
Daniel Martin
RE: Discussion – Week 6
The first thing that the administrator should do is to separate her emotions about losing her job if she does not support the construction of the new facility from her decision-making process. The administrator should then set up a meeting with the current director and the chief of nursing to prepare and plan for the board meeting. They need to take into account the current issues affecting the facility and the fact that the chairman of the board (COB) wants to leave and rebuild in a new area of the city.
The type of conflict between the administrator and the COB is considered a dyadic conflict. Still, since the director and chief of nursing are involved, it can also be regarded as intergroup conflict (Robbins & Judge, 2018, p. 228). The administrator and the COB are in stage three of the conflict process, where the intentions demonstrate both sides are competing for their “own” interests (Robbins & Judge, 2018, p. 231).
The administrator should prepare the facts about why it is best to complete the safety work and repairs and then highlight the money they will save. The administrator and her team should also appeal to the other board members to share their concerns for the sixty long-term residents that will be affected by this decision. The board members should know that the city officials also want CozyHome to stay and are revitalizing this part of the city.
The COB will have to prepare the other board members to see his reasoning behind changing locations and will have to show them a detailed business plan that outlines the stages at which the business can be profitable. The COB’s behavior and competing intentions show that he is not working together with the administrator and should consider collaborating instead to find a solution that works for everyone (Robbins & Judge, 2018, p. 232).
The COB and board members may also need to consider compromising on what happens to the current residents and their family members by offering a timeline that works and offers them some other option for housing (Robbins & Judge, 2018, p. 232). Both parties should also determine their BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) to avoid an impasse during the negotiations (Robbins & Judge, 2018, p. 237).
Since the COB had an outburst over the phone with the administrator and abruptly hung up the phone during their conversation, I would have the following ground rules in place to avoid any disruptions from any party. First, the meeting will take place at a neutral location where no one party has the upper hand (Robbins & Judge, 2018, p. 238). Second, I will decide on who will do the negotiating for both parties (Robbins & Judge, 2018, p. 238). Lastly, I will follow a specific procedure if an impasse is reached (Robbins & Judge, 2018, p. 238).
The goal at this point is to reach the closure and implementation stages of the negotiation process. To accomplish closure, we need to reduce interpersonal conflict by using the following approaches. The first approach I would use is to have both parties select the parts of the solution that are most important to them and pinpoint how we can meet those needs for each side (Robbins & Judge, 2018, p. 233).
The second approach is to air the differences of opinion of each party early so that if an issue arises, they have already aired them openly, which can allow them to meet in the middle (Robbins & Judge, 2018, p. 233). My third option is to keep personal motivations out of the equation and prioritizing the shared interest of both sides to avoid disagreements turning into barriers to closure and implementation (Robbins & Judge, 2018, p. 233). My hope in these negotiations would be to get both parties to see each other’s points and find a mutually agreeable solution.
References
Robbins, S., & Judge, T. A. (2018). Essentials of organizational behavior (14th ed.). Retrieved from https://mbsdirect.vitalsource.com/books/9780134524…l
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!