Older Workers’ Social Media Usage Case Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Older Workers’ Social Media Usage Case Essay
Purpose and Nature of the Test
Answers the following questions:
- What does the test measure? (Include scales.)
The effect of older workers’ social media usage at work on their workability
The scales used include Self-Efficacy and Work Ability, and Willingness to Delay Retirement.
Form of a Likert 7-point scale
- What does the test predict?
The test predicts the willingness of older workers to delay retirement
- What behavior does the test require the test taker to perform?
The test takers were required to answer a questionnaire.
- What population was the test designed for?
The population was designed for staff older than 55 years
- What is the nature of the test?
Objective test
- What is the format of the test?
Short answer test
Practical Evaluation
Answers the following questions:
- If you have access to a test manual, is it comprehensive? (I assume that most of you will not have access to a test manual–that is fine.)
Yes, the test is comprehensive.
- How easy or difficult is the test to administer?
The test is quite complex to administer, considering that data collection is done online. This means that variation on the response by the tests takers is inevitable.
- How clear are the administration directions?
The administration directions are quite clear and easy to follow when conducting the tests.
- How clear are the scoring procedures?
The coring procedures are quite simple, with most of them ranging between 1-7 in terms of the simplest to the most complex. The test takers can answer the tests questions with ease.
- What qualifications and training, if any, does an administrator need to have?
The administrators only need an average literacy level with good analysis and coordination skills. For instance, the administrators needed the skills to analyze data using SPSS and Cronbach alpha tools.
- Does the test have face validity?
Yes, the test has face validity, and it is relevant.
Technical Evaluation
Answers the following questions:
- Is there a norm group? Who comprises it? What types of norms are there?
The research work included a norm group.
The norm group comprised of older persons beyond 55 years that did not use social media.
The social norms available in this research work include the folkways norms.
How was the norm group selected? Are there subgroup norms?
The norm group in this research is selected through the online data collected. Through the online data collected through social media.
- What is the estimate of the test’s reliability? How was reliability determined?
The scale demonstrated strong internal consistency reliability in the presurvey sample, with a Cronbach’s alpha of .902. Test-retest reliability is a consistency measure obtained by administering the same test to a group of people twice over a period. By comparing Time 1 with Time 2, the test’s stability over time can be assessed.
- What is the evidence for the validity of the test? How was validity determined?
Validity is a conclusion reached after a careful study of several sorts of evidence. The measure’s dependability, whether it covers the construct of interest, and whether the scores it generates are linked to other factors that should be correlated with rather than conceptually separate variables are all critical pieces of evidence. The pattern of outcomes over multiple investigations, not a single study, determines the dependability and validity. The process of assessing validity and reliability is still in progress.
- What is the standard error of measurement?
The standard error of measurement (SEM) indicates how a people’s “actual” score is dispersed around repeated measures on the same instrument. Because no measurement accurately represents the genuine score, the correct score will always be unknown. In this case, the measurement has a standard error of measurement of 1.
- What are the confidence intervals?
The confidence of this research is quite low, with an interval of 0.001%.
Test Reviews
Answers at least one of the following questions in a full paragraph with sufficient detail:
- What do reviewers say are the strengths and weaknesses of the test?
One of the study’s strengths is that it focuses on a topic that has received less attention from other researchers. The report could be used to develop a health bonus strategy by appropriate government agencies. The aging of the entire population, particularly in China, needs the creation of a health bonus plan that is in line with national conditions. The findings can also reduce opposition among older people when devising a deferred-retirement strategy. The outcomes of the study indicate that workability and work stress have an impact on older people’s decision to delay retirement.
The study’s weaknesses include the fact that it investigated the impact of social media on older persons’ willingness to retire. While this effect has been proven, social support acquired via social media has only been studied in terms of knowledge and emotional support. The study does not examine the impact of different types of social assistance on older people.
This study does not differentiate across vocations or take into account the many differences between them. The study is still ongoing, and different occupations will be investigated in the future to determine whether there are any variations in older people’s willingness to delay retirement. This research focuses on a subset of China’s senior population in the province of Anhui. It is unclear whether the same outcomes would be achieved in other regions or countries due to cultural variations.
- What studies that used the test as a measurement instrument have been published?
None so far.
- How did the test perform when researchers or test users, other than the test developers, used it?
When the researchers used the test, the standard deviation measurement was quite high than when the test developers used it.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!