Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
NSG4029 Leadership in a Diverse Society Assignment 1 Leadership Assessment and Improvement Plan Instructions and Assignment Details
Introduction: Complete the Leadership Assessment Tools. Analyze the data from these tools. Develop plan for self-improvement per the instructions.
Mind Tools: https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_50.htm
MACH-IV: https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/MACH-IV/
Objectives
- Analyze leadership concepts, skills and decision-making strategies in professional practice.
- Compare and contrast leadership and management.
- Discuss the influence of nursing leadership styles on decision-making.
- Identify nursing leadership strategies regarding effective commination, conflict management, negotiations, delegation, supervision, and utilization of staff.
Reading and Resources Necessary for the Assignment
Porter-O’Grady, T. & Malloch, K. (2016). Leadership in nursing practice. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
Read chapter 1 and 2.
Instructions
- Read the Assigned readings.
- Complete the assigned leadership assessment tools.
- Develop a short paper suing the criteria listed below.
- Submit to the Assignment to Week 2 area: Assignment 1 Leadership Assessment and Improvement Plan by the posted due date.
Assignment Content Parts – See Template
- Content Area 1: APA Cover
- Content Area 2: APA Introduction
- Include a 3 sentences including the purpose statement of the assignment.
- Content Area 3: Summary of Self-Assessment Tool Results
- Complete the tools the self-assessment tool results.
- In paragraph form, summarize the results.
- Content Area 4: Analysis and Reelection
- After reflecting on the results of the assessment tools, identify two area of leadership you would like to grow and develop that will enhance your professional nursing practice.
- Explain how these two areas will support your professional development.
- Consider how your personal and professional experiences have influenced the development of your leadership skills and abilities.
- Content Area 5: Evidence-Based Leadership Plan
- Describe at least one evidence-based strategies to improve each area of leadership described in your paper.
- Content Area 6: Conclusion
- Include a 3-4 sentences summarizing the major points and purpose of the paper.
- Content Area 7: References
- All references must be listed on a new page and in alphabetical order by author last name. All references listed must be cited.
Submit: Submit approximately 2 pages of content in paragraph format plus one APA cover page and one page of APA references. Use Level 1 and Level 2 APA headings to demonstrate organization.
- Papers longer than 3 pages of content will not be graded after the end of page 3.
- The completed assignment must include an APA title page. References must start on a new page, the final page of the assignment. Two references are required. Do not cite or reference the assigned assessment tools.
- Upload the completed assignment to the BrightSpace in Microsoft Word by the due date.
- You may be required to submit the actual sources or articles used as references or submit the assignment for plagiarism detection such as turnitin.com.
Grading: Each assignment will be graded per the syllabus using the following rubric:
Assignment Grading Rubric
50% 50 40 30 15 0 Assignment Assignment is Assignment is clear Assignment is Assignment loses Does not meet Content Parts explicit, focused, and maintains focus generally clear, focus or has major assignment and clearly includes throughout. Minor explicitly stated, but lapses in relevancy to criteria. all listed assignment lapses in focus or has several lapses in assignment criteria. criteria. relevancy to focus and relevancy Minimally meets assignment criteria. to assignment assignment criteria. criteria.
20% 20 15 10 5 0 Quality/Accur Discussion is There are minor There are some There are major Discussion of acy of developed and is lapses in either the lapses in the lapses in either the Information Information clearly supported by development of the development of the development of the lacks the literature. No discussion or in the discussion and/or in discussion or in the organization. lapses in logical support by the the support by the support by the progression of literature. No lapses literature. It literature. No lapses information. in logical includes some in logical progression Contains specific, progression of supporting details of information. It well developed information. It and/or examples. includes minimal information. It includes some supporting details includes several supporting details and/or examples. supporting details and/or examples. and/or examples.
10% 10 7 5 3 0 Organization/ Information is very Minor lapses in Some lapses in Major lapses in Incomplete or Quality of organized with well- organization, either organization, organization and/or illegible. Writing constructed headings, or use of headings, paragraph Majority of paragraphs and paragraph and/or paragraph construction. Major information headings. Skillful construction. construction. Some lapses in sentence from references and purposeful Vocabulary is lapses in sentence fluency. Many is direct quotes. vocabulary. Skillful precise and fluency. Some grammatical, use of sentence purposeful. Minor information from spelling, and fluency. Information lapses in sentence references formatting errors. from references is fluency. Majority of paraphrased. Some Majority of paraphrased. information from use of direct quotes. information from references is references is quoted paraphrased. Direct directly with minimal quotes are used use of paraphrasing. sparingly.
10% 10 7 5 3 0 Sources All references are The majority of Some references are Majority of No use of from relevant peer- references are from from non-peer- references are from sources. reviewed sources, relevant peer- reviewed sources or non-peer-reviewed within a 5 year time reviewed sources, are older than 5 sources or are older frame or are classic within a 5 year time years. than 5 years.
sources. No frame or are classic editorials/commenta sources. ries. 10% 10 7 5 3 0 APA Skillful and Minimal There are There are major No use of APA proficient use of problems/lapses in problems/lapses in problems/lapses in formatting or APA formatting of APA formatting of APA formatting of APA formatting of reference text, citations, and text, citations and/or text, citations and/or text, citations and/or citation. references. No references. One references. –Four references. Five or grammatical, grammatical, grammatical, more grammatical, spelling, or spelling, or spelling, or spelling, or punctuation errors. punctuation errors. punctuation errors. punctuation errors. TOTAL Max 100
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!