Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
NRS-493 Capstone Project Change Proposal Deliverables Table
Activity Deliverable Direct or Indirect
Clinical HoursTopic 1 Assess Work with your preceptor to perform a needs assessment of the organization and the community.
Review
Review the needs assessment for project topics.
Complete
Complete the Individual Success Plan (ISP), located in the assignment instructions document and review with your preceptor.
Review
Meet with your preceptor and review the Clinical Evaluation Tool (CET).
Schedule
Initiate the pre-conference with your preceptor and instructor.
Reflect
Begin a reflective journal examining your experience in the clinical setting.
Submit Direct clinical hours in the Lopes Activity Tracker (LAT).
Submit
Create a list of topics for the capstone project change proposal.
Submit
Place the completed ISP in LoudCloud.
Submit
Place the Practice Experience Conference (Pre-Conference) form in LoudCloud.
Submit
Place the reflective journal entry in LoudCloud.
Direct 10 hours of direct clinical.
Indirect
1 hour of indirect clinical.
Topic 2 Review Data Review the findings from the needs assessment, instructor feedback from the preconference, and potential interventions for the change proposal.
Research
Search the literature for evidence to support your topic and nursing practice intervention.
Decide
Decide which category aligns with your practice experience topic and intervention—community clinical practice or leadership clinical practice. There are examples of each category in the syllabus under Clinical Practice Experiences.
Write
Complete the Topic Selection and Approval Paper assignment.
Reflect
Continue the reflective journal.
Submit Direct clinical hours in the Lopes Activity Tracker (LAT).
Submit
Place a short summary explaining which category your topic and intervention is under (community or leadership) in LoudCloud.
Submit
Place the Topic Selection and Approval Paper in LoudCloud.
Submit
Place the journal entry in LoudCloud.
Direct 10 hours of direct clinical.
Indirect
6 hours of indirect clinical.
Indirect
1 hour of indirect clinical.
Topic 3 Assess Work with your preceptor to assess the culture of the community or the organizational culture to align with the clinical practice category that aligns with your topic and intervention.
Review
Review the cultural assessment and consider how the findings connect to the topic and interventions.
Write
Write a list objective for the capstone project change proposal intervention.
Write
PICOT Question Paper.
Reflect
Continue the reflective journal.
Submit Direct clinical hours in the Lopes Activity Tracker (LAT).
Submit
Place the list of objectives in LoudCloud.
Submit
Place the PICOT Question Paper in LoudCloud.
Submit
Place the journal entry in LoudCloud.
Direct 10 hours of direct clinical.
Indirect
1 hour of indirect clinical.
Indirect
1 hour of indirect clinical.
Topic 4 Assess Work with your preceptor to assess organizational policies.
Write
Write a list of measurable outcomes for the capstone project intervention.
Write
Complete the Literature Evaluation Table.
Reflect
Continue the reflective journal.
Submit Direct clinical hours in the Lopes Activity Tracker (LAT).
Submit
Place the list of measurable outcomes in LoudCloud.
Submit
Place the Literature Evaluation Table in LoudCloud.
Submit
Place the journal entry in LoudCloud.
Direct 10 hours of direct clinical.
Indirect
1 hour of indirect clinical.
Topic 5 Assess Work with your preceptor to assess the organization and community for stakeholders.
Review
Review the cultural aspects of the organization and the different strategies the organization uses to initiate change.
Create
Create a strategic plan defining how your intervention might be implemented.
Write
Complete the Midterm Evaluation of Student by Preceptor Clinical Evaluation with your preceptor.
Schedule
Initiate a mid-conference.
Remediate
Complete remediation activity, if required.
Reflect
Continue the reflective journal.
Submit Direct clinical hours in the Lopes Activity Tracker (LAT).
Submit
Place a summary of the strategic plan in LoudCloud.
Submit
Place the “Midterm Evaluation of Student by Preceptor Clinical Evaluation Tool” in LoudCloud
Place the CET document in LoudCloud.
Submit
Place Practice Experience Conference (Mid-Conference) form in LoudCloud.
Submit
Place remediation assignment in Topic 7 in LoudCloud.
Submit
Place the journal entry in LoudCloud.
Direct 10 hours of direct clinical.
Indirect
3 hours of indirect clinical.
Topic 6 Assess Work with your preceptor to assess the organization for required resources needed for the strategic plan if the change proposal were to be implemented.
Determine
Review the strategic plan and determine what resources would be needed if the change proposal were to be implemented.
Write
Complete a list of required resources.
Write
Complete the Literature Review paper.
Reflect
Continue the reflective journal.
Submit Direct clinical hours in the Lopes Activity Tracker (LAT).
Submit
Place the list of resources in LoudCloud.
Submit
Place the Literature Review in LoudCloud.
Submit
Place the journal entry in LoudCloud.
Direct 10 hours of direct clinical.
Indirect
3 hours of indirect clinical.
Topic 7 Review Review the strategic plan to implement the change proposal, objectives, outcomes, and listed resources.
Create
Develop a process to evaluate the intervention if it were implemented.
Create
Begin creating a plan to present the capstone project change proposal. Incorporate the strategic plan, objectives, outcomes, resources, and how the intervention is evaluated.
Reflect
Continue the reflective journal.
Submit Direct clinical hours in the Lopes Activity Tracker (LAT).
Submit
Place a summary of the evaluation plan in LoudCloud.
Discuss
In the discussion forum, summarize the dissemination plan.
Submit
Place the journal entry in LoudCloud.
Direct 10 hours of direct clinical.
Indirect
3 hours of indirect clinical.
Topic 8 Assess Work with your preceptor and leadership to assess the strategic plan for implementation of the change proposal.
Write
Complete the Benchmark-Written Capstone Project.
Reflect
Continue the reflective journal.
Submit Direct clinical hours in the Lopes Activity Tracker (LAT).
Submit
Place the Benchmark-Written Capstone Project in LoudCloud.
Submit
Place the journal entry in LoudCloud.
Direct 10 hours of direct clinical.
Topic 9 Review Review the assessment of the strategic plan for implementation and organize the information needed for presentation in Topic 10.
Create
Design a professional presentation to present the capstone project proposal and review with your preceptor.
Reflect
Continue the reflective journal.
Submit Direct clinical hours in the Lopes Activity Tracker (LAT).
Submit
Place the professional presentation in LoudCloud for faculty review.
Submit
Place the journal entry in LoudCloud.
Direct 10 hours of direct clinical.
Indirect
5 hours of indirect clinical.
Topic 10 Evaluate Evaluate your clinical experience and capstone project change proposal.
Write
Complete the Individual Success Plan (ISP) that was started in Topic 1 and review with your preceptor.
Dissemination
Present your capstone project change proposal.
Write
Complete the Benchmark – Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal by writing a summary of all journal entries.
Write
Complete a summary of the scholarly activity using the “Scholarly Activities” instructions.
Write
Complete the Final CET with your preceptor.
Schedule
Initiate a practice experience conference (post-conference).
Write
Complete the Final Evaluation of Student by Preceptor
Write
Complete the Student Evaluation of Agency/Site.
Submit Direct clinical hours in the Lopes Activity Tracker (LAT).
Submit
Place the ISP in LoudCloud.
Submit
Place a summary of how the presentation was received in LoudCloud.
Submit
Place the summary in LoudCloud.
Submit
Place the “Scholarly Activities” in LoudCloud.
Submit
Place the final CET in LoudCloud.
Submit
Place the “Practice Experience Conference Form (Post-Conference)” in LoudCloud.
Submit
Place the “Final Evaluation of Student by Preceptor Clinical Evaluation Tool” in LoudCloud
Submit
Place the “Student Evaluation of Agency/Site” in LoudCloud
Direct 10 hours of direct clinical.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!