|
Diverse Perspectives |
Communication |
Critical Reading |
Reflection |
A |
The case study demonstrates a good deal of |
The case study uses the required number |
The case study accurately and |
There is ample, compelling |
|
complexity, thinking through the ideas |
and type of sources, but more importantly, it |
effectively summarizes the texts, |
evidence in the case study |
|
presented by the texts deeply and |
uses them actively and ethically to |
and draws out shrewd |
that the author has fully |
|
thoroughly. The work considers multiple |
demonstrate its points for the reader. It also |
observations from analysis, |
considered feedback from |
|
perspectives, including from various cultures |
shows a perceptive understanding of how to |
demonstrating evidence of strong |
peers and the professor in |
|
and intellectual perspectives, with grace and |
organize its components to best serve the |
critical reading skills. The project |
crafting and revising the work. |
|
agility. Overall, the project enacts a diversity |
point it’s trying to make, arranging the |
also places the various texts into a |
|
|
of perspectives in order to create new |
material with clarity and cohesion. The |
fully synthesized conversation that |
|
|
knowledge. |
project seems carefully developed to give the |
unfolds in a robust and meaningful |
|
|
|
reader something new to think about. |
way. |
|
B |
The case study demonstrates a good sense of |
The case study uses the required number |
The case study demonstrates good |
There is sufficient evidence in |
|
complexity, showing clear thought about the |
and type of sources, and does so with |
work in summarizing and analyzing |
the case study that the author |
|
ideas presented by the texts. The work |
general effectiveness, showing awareness of |
the texts, drawing out clear ideas |
has considered feedback from |
|
considers multiple perspectives well for the |
their ethical deployment. It shows some |
from them. The project places the |
peers and the professor in |
|
most part, and shows an overall attempt to |
good attention to the organization of its |
texts into conversation sufficiently |
crafting and revising the work. |
|
create knew knowledge from them. |
components, generally arranging them for |
to show their interplay of ideas. |
|
|
|
the benefit of the project’s point. The project |
|
|
|
|
gives the impression of clear thought about |
|
|
|
|
what it wants to communicate. |
|
|
C |
The case study demonstrates some thought |
The case study uses the required number |
The case study demonstrates some |
There is some evidence in the |
|
about the ideas presented by the texts, |
and type of sources, but it uses them in less |
work at summary and analysis, but |
case study that the author has |
|
though it falls somewhat short of complexity. |
than effective ways. The sources could have |
not always to a sufficient degree. |
at least made some |
|
The project considers multiple perspectives |
done more heavy lifting to serve the |
Some texts may be misrepresented |
consideration of peer or |
|
to some degree, though more diversity or |
project’s ideas. In addition, while the |
or some ideas may not seem to |
professor feedback, but not |
|
more thought could have helped. The project |
organization has a basic shape, the choices |
arise clearly from a text. |
enough to revise the work |
|
shows at least some effort to create new |
might have better served the content’s |
Additionally, while there may be |
sufficiently. |
|
knowledge, even if it might not get there |
needs. The project doesn’t seem to be |
some attempt to place the texts |
|
|
fully. |
reaching the reader’s needs. |
into conversation, that synthesis is |
|
|
|
|
not always sufficiently clear or |
|
|
|
|
developed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
D |
The case study tends to oversimplify the |
The case study does not use the required |
The case study falls short of project |
There is minimal or no |
|
ideas presented by the texts; it fails to |
number or type of sources; it falls short of |
requirements and/or does not |
evidence in the case study |
|
consider diverse perspectives fully or |
effectively using those sources to serve the |
perform all project tasks. |
that the author has |
|
perhaps it even disrespects some of them; or |
project; and/or the project’s organization is |
|
considered feedback, and thus |
|
it fails to create any new knowledge. |
not serving the content. |
|
the project is insufficiently |
|
|
|
|
revised. |
F |
The case study makes no discernable effort |
The case study makes no discernable effort |
The case study makes no |
The case study has not been |
|
to understand the ideas and perspectives |
to use sources or to organize its ideas |
discernable effort to summarize |
revised at all, based on |
|
under consideration. |
effectively. |
texts or place them into |
feedback or otherwise. |
|
|
|
conversation. |
|