Moral Dilemma and Ethics 1
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Moral Dilemma and Ethics 1
RUNNING HEAD: MORAL DILEMMA & ETHICS 1
MORAL DILEMMA & ETHICS 2
RUNNING HEAD: MORAL DILEMMA & ETHICS 3
Moral Dilemmas and Ethical Decisions
Samantha M. Tallarine
Capella University
Policy, Law, Ethics, and Regulations
May, 2019
Looking after patients in an emergency room brings forth ethical dilemmas. Owing to the limited time and the condition of the victim in addition to the absence of treatment history, difficulties usually occur. The nurse is faced with minimal time to analyse all the details regarding the patient in question. It is therefore recommended that the nurse should make a quick assessment and take the necessary action which is by the hospital protocol. This chaos that occurs in emergency rooms poses a distinct ethical challenge, which calls for nurses to familiarize themselves with ethical principles as well as concepts.
Health care protocols and policies guiding triage attention in the event of an emergency
“Nursing intuition and subjective decision making are required even with the most advanced triage systems, further leading to variability in triage processes and outcomes. Given the associated risk in the triage environment, as our patient demands evolve, so must our nursing practice to ensure optimum patient outcomes” (Domagala & Vets, 2015). Nurses expect to treat patients and also save lives. While assessing patients and beginning the triage process, nurses must be able to separate patients into emergent, urgent, and non-urgent. In effectively classifying the patients in this way they can assure that the most serious injuries and illnesses are being treated first in order to save lives.
Strategies Used During Triage
According to Aacharya, Gastmans, and Denier there are numerous different strategies that can be implemented when triaging patients. “The most commonly used guidelines for ED triage on the international literature are The Manchester Triage Score, The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS), The Australasian Triage Scale (ATS), and Emergency severity Index. In ESI, there are five-levels of these triage score. In addition national and institutional guidelines are also developed and used in practice” (Aacharya, Gastmans & Denier, 2011). CTAS and ATS break down their triage system into 5 tiers; Resuscitation – Level 1 (0 minute wait), Emergency – Level 2 (10-15 minute wait), Urgent – Level 3 (30 minute wait), Semi-urgent/less urgent – Level 4 (60 minute wait), Nonurgent – Level 5 (120 minute wait). Manchester Triage Score goes as following; Immediate (Red) – Level 1 (0 minutes), Very urgent (Orange) – Level 2 (10 minutes), Urgent (Yellow) – Level 3 (60 minutes), Standard (Green) – Level 4 (120 minutes), Nonurgent (Blue) – Level 5 (240 minutes). All the systems use a 5-tiered system, but differ on the time expected for patients to see the provider.
The Emergency Service Index (ESI) is what is most commonly used in United States hospitals. It is also a 5-tiered system that relies on nurses to triage patients effectively into the appropriate category using both their judgment and diagnostic testing. Level one requires immediate life-saving interventions, level two consists of high-risk patients (i.e. dyspnea, confusion, extreme pain, lethargy, etc.), and the following three tiers are non-emergent cases that can afford to wait for medical treatment. In learning the ESI effectively, nurses can efficiently triage patients and ensure people are receiving the correct level of care.
Medical attention disparities effects on treatment decisions
Unfortunately, it is not uncommon to hear that someone died in a particular hospital as a result of neglect by the clinicians. Treatment disparities occur as a result of institutionalised inequities and not technology, medication or access. Even though the process helps make swift decisions, it serves as an avenue through which impressions and assumptions flow which in effect brings about biased treatment judgments on the part of the practitioner (Griffith, 2018). Nurses are human, and with that comes imperfections. It is very possible that a nurse can have underlying biases that they may not even be conscious of. This can come through when they are treating patients who may be homeless, or have mental illness. This is why there should be more than one nurse that is in charge of doing triage.
Health care policies directed towards the care of uninsured patients
Health care across different nations provides little priced safety nets, which include free clinics, community health centers, as well as public hospitals. Here, the uninsured patients receive medical attention at a low price irrespective of their differences. Whether the uninsured patients are low-income earners or high-income earners, they are always aware of the existence of low cost and high price medical centers respectively.
There are also policies that exist to allow any patient to receive medical attention in the event of an emergency. There is no valid reason to discriminate an individual based on their financial condition during a crisis (Christakis, 2014). The responsibility for uninsured patients is also widely recognized through offering high-class major safety nets, which include educational health centers and free clinics. It can, therefore, be concluded that in the event an uninsured person falls sick, there are many places to receive medical attention.
Moral and ethical challenges faced by nurses when enacting hospital protocols and policies.
In every country of the world, nurses have encountered ethical difficulties in the pursuit of patient’s health care. It is also by the nursing profession that they should uphold principles, moral virtues and duties which have become increasingly sophisticated in the face of immense pressures and moral choices incurred in the line of duty (Jones, 2016). The demand for nurses to meet the multifaceted requirements for the patients creates a very complex nursing environment. The nurses must ensure that the rights of the patients are upheld irrespective of the multidimensional differences.
Unethical practices in emergency rooms and other areas should be avoided at any cost to maintain the image of the firm. It is also a moral obligation to ensure that end of life concerns are well taken care of, alongside preserving the confidentiality of the patients towards health care. These honest and ethical obligations result in more stress among nurses. There is also a conflict of interest that arises if an uninsured patient comes along. Although nurses have the obligation to treat each patient fairly regardless of race, sex or income, they may receive pressure from the organization to treat insured patients first, regardless of acuity.
Strategies for managing the care of the uninsured and indigent population
The number of uninsured patients has been on the rise for a few decades as a result of the premiums paid for life insurance, which is far beyond the budgets or natural population. Their governments through the public health sector can support the non-working, uninsured patients.
The funds to finance medical activities are raised from taxes, and this results in high fees amongst the employed as well as the business sector. General tax revenues which may include income tax, import duties and sales tax can be preferred. The medically uninsurable population comprises of a small group of the general population. Their health care demands can be met through incentives or taxes or both (Kolodner, 2014). The uninsured working group can be mandated to take insurance policies since they can afford them. The employers should ensure that their employees pay a regular amount towards their insurance policy.
In conclusion, it is therefore clear that many steps are involved in triage nursing. There already exists health care policies and protocols that have to be adhered to in case of an emergency. The general nursing environment is also a major factor that affect the treatment decisions made by nurses. Conflicts of interest and maintaining confidence of patients are some of the ethical challenges faced by nurses. However , the uninsured patients can be taken care of through numerous strategies which can be adopted by the various states.
Resources
Aacharya, R. P., Gastmans, C., & Denier, Y. (2011). Emergency department triage: An ethical analysis. BMC Emergency Medicine, 11, 16. doi:http://dx.doi.org.library.capella.edu/10.1186/1471-227X-11-16
Asch DA, Jedrziewski K, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2014;50(10):1129–1136.
Burns JP, Mitchell C, Griffith JL, Troug RD. End-of-life care in the pediatric intensive care unit: Attitudes and practices of pediatric critical care physicians and nurses. Critical Care Medicine. 2015;29(3):658–664.
Butz A, Redman BK, Fry ST, Kolodner K. Ethical conflicts experienced by certified pediatric nurse practitioners in ambulatory settings. Journal of Pediatric Health Care. 2014;12(4):183–190.
Domagala, S. E., & Vets, J. (2015). Emergency nursing triage: Keeping it safe: JEN JEN. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 41(4), 313-316. doi:http://dx.doi.org.library.capella.edu/10.1016/j.jen.2015.01.022
Grady C, Soeken KL, Danis M, O’Donnell P, Taylor C, Farrar A, Ulrich CM. Does ethics education influence moral action of practicing nurses and social workers. American Journal of Bioethics. 2018; 8(4):4–11.
Jones TM. Ethical decision-making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review. 2016;16:366–395.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!