Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Topic: economics
Paper details:For the Essay:
The primary goal of the persuasion essay is to explain a problem to the audience and motivate (persuade) the audience to accept and partake in a proposed solution. The essay should use one of the organizational patterns we discussed in class: problem-cause- solution, cause-effect-solution, or Monroe’s Motivated Sequence. You should indicate which organizational pattern you are using at the top.
Even though the Monroe Motivated Sequence has five steps, the middle three are the main body points, so it has the same main points as the other two organization patterns. . A quick summary is listed below.Attention: Get the audiences attention and introduce the problem. Give a preview of the speech. In other words, the attention step is your seven step intro.
Need: This is a hybrid cause-effect point. In other words, convince the audience that there is a harm (need) caused by something.
Satisfaction: The satisfaction step is the solution step. Eliminate causes and offer a personal solution.
Visualization: This is unique to Monroe. Ask the audience to visualize a world with your solutions in place. Or scare them into showing how bad things will get if the solution is not completed.
After the visualization step in complete, begin the conclusion. This final part of a Monroe’s speech (replacing your social significant ending) is the
Action: Tell the audience what to do in that exact moment. The action step is essentially a call to action. If you are giving a speech persuading people to donate to a charity, this is where you ask for the money.
PROBLEM-CAUSE-SOLUTION
The problem-cause-solution speech is a three main point speech named for the focus of each main point: first point covers problems, second point reveals the causes of that problem, and third point focuses on solutions.First point: Problem
In the point, regardless of how you subpoints are set up, the audience should understand what the problem is and why the problem is bad. In other words, define the problem and describe its harms.Second point: Causes
By the end of the first point, the audience should be so enraged or concerned by the problem that they want to know what is causing the harms. So, point 2 becomes the causes, telling the audience either what created the problem in the first place, or what allows the problem to continue.Third Point: Solutions
Solve for the causes. If the causes are eliminated, then the problem shouldn’t exist. Include a personal solution. Tell the audience what they can specifically do to help solve the problem. For example, if the problem is plastic bags cause environmental harm, the personal solution is to start using reusable bags.CAUSE-EFFECT-SOLUTION
The cause-effect-solution speech is a three main point speech named for the focus of each main point: first point covers causes of a problem, second point reveals the effects of that problem, and third point focuses on solutions.First point: Causes
This is identical to the cause point above. Tell the audience what is causing a problem to take place by focusing on what created the problem or what is allowing the problem to continue as of this moment in time.Second point: Effects
This point focuses exclusively on harms. Tell the audience what harms have been created by the causes or what harms will occur. By the end of this point, the audience shold be ready and willing to move into solutions.Third point: Solutions
Again, eliminate the causes and offer a personal solution.WHY THE NEED FOR THREE?
Problem-Cause-Solution works best for essays that are brand new or the audience has never heard of. Cause-Effect-Solution works better for problems that are a little older or can easily be explained in the intro as the goal here is to create an immediate sense of urgency. Monroe works better if arguing from the positive, or in a sales process. If you think about it, all good infomercials are essentially Monroe speeches.Introduction – are all of the necessary steps present? AGD, thesis, preview, etc? Include a source in the intro to improve ETHOS.
Structure – does the speech follow one of the outline patterns listed above? Are all subpoints parallel and independent? Are there internal previews? Transitions?
Problem/Strength of Argument – do we understand the problem at hand? (Problem should be well defined and researched.) Is your argument logical? (Problem should be fallacy free, adequately sourced, solid Data/Warrants/Claim.) Do we understand what is causing the problem? Do you adequately cover the problem’s harms?Problem/Cause/Solution and Cause/Effect/Solution You must include both quantitative and qualitative evidence to be successful! Do not forget to include narrative evidence. PATHOS and LOGOS.
Solutions – Do you solve the problem (causes eliminated)? Does your solution include something that the audience can personally do to solve the problem (personal solutions)? Is there proof that your solution works?
Conclusion – restate thesis/tags, refer back to AGD, social significant ending.
This speech needs at least FOUR sources. THREE of them need to be from published sources. Include a references page at the end in proper APA format. You should also indicate in your typed essay where each source is used/cited.I attached a doc ( self intro sample outline) because it explains how AGD, thesis, & preview should be constructed.
For the draft: (use the self into sample outline for examples of how agd, thesis, and previews, are constructed)
Write out Introduction
Write out your entire introduction in paragraph form including at least one source. Correctly cite the source as if you were speaking (follow the “Citation Rules”)Citing sources in this essay is not the same as citing sources in an APA paper. While one can never technically cite too much information, the focus should be on citing information that will improve your personal ethos. Usually, this is a matter of recency (how new is the source) and quality (does the information come from a reputable place). Below you will find what you must cite for every type of source.
Books (Author and Title)
“The book, Why I Love Speech Class by Orville Oratory states…”Magazines (Publication and Date)
“The Economist of June 14, 2019 indicates…”Journals (Publication and Date)
“The May 2018 Journal of the American Medical Association reveals…”Newspapers (Publication and Date)
“According to the February 14, 2016 New York Times…”Websites (Url or Agency + date the site was either accessed or updated)
“According to ed.gov” or “The U.S. Department of Education’s website claims…”Outline Body
Complete the body of the essay in draft format while completing the following:List the proactive tag for each point
Indicate where all evidence will be used
Make sure that sub points are clear and independent
The body portion of the draft should be long enough for me to completely understand your argument and where you will be using your evidence, but short enough to that it remains an draft, not a complete paper.
The reader should be able to tell from your draft which of the 3 persuasive organizational patterns you are using
References Page
Complete a references page in correct APA format. All sources that are in your references should be used in the outline somewhere.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!