Microsoft and Software System Engineering Process
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Microsoft and Software System Engineering Process
Microsoft, Software, System, Engineering, Process
So here is the Break Down of the Question:
write APA style 4 pages for
Project outline (1 page)
Identify the company and category of software developed.
List process improvement goals.
Material can be taken from the approved proposal submitted to instructor.
Be sure this project is approved by the instructor.
Process improvement background (2–4 pages)
Research current industry-accepted software development process improvement methods.
Choose the methods that you will use to guide your process improvement plan and justify your selection
Describe background material from your choice of industry-accepted software development process improvement methods.
And 4 pages for following content:
Work within the subsection titled Best Software Practices for Process Improvement.
Identify the problem.
Identify the areas that need improvements within the organization, the process, or the team.
Identify the solution.
Identify at least 3 best software practices that fit the organization that you selected to improve.
Provide brief descriptions of each of those practices.
Justify the solution.
Make sure that you justify your selection for each practice and how it will improve the process.
Implement and communicate the solution.
Provide a plan to implement and communicate those improvements, and analyze the potential benefits that these improvements will have on the organization and its processes.
Software System Engineering Process
Microsoft
Microsoft is the world’s largest software development company.it was founded by Bill Gates and his friend Paul in 1975 from the improvement of BASIC. This programming language was then used in personal computers (Kozlovska & Vinnik, 2017).
Microsoft started with the aim of developing applications and systems to be used in personal computers. Microsoft has a strong foundation in software development for individual computers. The culture of Microsoft has enabled it to remain at the top of its game, considering its bargaining power in technological advancement.
Categories of software developed
The Microsoft designs computer software that is categorized into the application, system, programming, and driver software. In the bigger picture, programming and driver software are considered system software.
They are both used in running systems software to enhance the performance of the operating system. Application software enables the user to perform specific tasks. This application software developed by Microsoft includes; Microsoft office, which combines all office used applications in one, Microsoft suite, among others.
Systems software is essential software; they create a computer connection between hardware and software and give the implementation, programming, and driver software an environment to operate. MS-DOS was the first system software developed by Microsoft from BASIC programming language improvement (Kurbanova, Korableva & Kalimullina, 2018).
Process improvement goals.
During software development, Microsoft sets up a team of developers to handle the development requirements. Teamwork improves efficiency, effectiveness, quality, and capability of the development of unique and up-to-date software. Secondly, Motivation of staff is the second form of the improvement strategy.
Staff motivation ensures all work done is highly applicated and recognized, making the staff work more and provide the best software. The last improvement is training and capacity building (mentoring) for the staff (Someh & Wixom, 2017).
These ensure the company has retained skillsets at every stage of their development. All employees play a role in the development and ensure that all steps are well understood and discussed before progress to the next scene.
References
Kozlovska, H. B., & Vinnik, M. (2017). Microsoft Corporation: historical insight and importance of innovations in contemporary language and information world (Doctoral dissertation, Видавничий дім «Ельдорадо»).
Kurbanova, E., Korableva, O., & Kalimullina, O. (2018, January). Enhancing the effectiveness of asset management through development of license management system on the basis of SCCM 2012 program by microsoft company. In ICEIS (2) (pp. 171-178).
Someh, I. A., & Wixom, B. (2017). Microsoft turns to data to drive business success.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!