Mental Illnesses Case Study Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Mental Illnesses Case Study Assignment
Lewis (2016) stated that Commination within an organization is essential. He also stated that knowing the audience that you are communicating with is just as important. Lewis (2016) stated you can communicate until you’re blue in the face, but if your message falls on deaf ears, then you’re just wasting your time and energy.
When communicating with different groups of people, the communicator needs to do research on what are the best ways to communicate with the audience before addressing the topic one is to discuss. The communicator then needs to tailor their presentation to fit the audience that they are presenting to. If the communicator is not able to tailor it to the specific group the message that they are trying to communicate will be lost on the audience.
I have chosen three audiences to convey the message “Don’t do drugs,” those audiences are Children, people with intellectual disabilities, and juveniles. With communicating this message I had to research what would be the best approach for each audience and tailor my message. The presentation and the delivery of my message will be very different between the three groups in order for it to be successful. Each group has a different vocabulary level and I needs to know what will grab their attention in order for them to actually pay attention to my message.
When relaying the message “Don’t do drugs” to children I tailored my message to be fitting for their age group. When talking to children within the age range of preschool to age seven I need to focus on my tone, I need to keep my tone calm and I have to focus on terminology that they would be able to understand. The less blank stares that I have the more informative it will be. I will discuss specifics on how drugs make a person feel, the risk of overdosing and the other long term damage that they could have if they participate in using drugs.
It is best to be knowledgeable in the topic that you are talking about, especially the types of drugs that you are talking about because children in this age group will have questions, and the main question will be “why?” Also, with this age group, any props that I may use within my presentation would have to be colorful and would have to be real life looking props. They would have to be able to see the real items in order to identify with them.
Talking to children within the age range of 8 years old and 12 years old, I would be more interactive, versus being informative. I would ask these children Open-ended non-judgmental questions and ask them how they feel about drug use and people that use them. This group is going to show me that they are actually listening to the information that I am communicating if they ask me questions. I need to keep this group interested by answering their questions and having them participate within my presentation. Kids within this age range are more receptive to the information if they are allowed to discuss their thoughts and views on the topic without judgment.
Discussing the topic “Don’t do drugs” with juveniles is touchy, one needs to be careful with the how one communicates this information. Young people usually have a curiosity about drugs, so being informational I think would be great, though, being overly informational will bore them and they will not pay attention at that point. One must also be conscious to realize that this age group also suffers from peer pressure are with or the desire to fit into a certain group or groups, therefore, tread lightly. I think that when talking about drugs with juveniles, it is also helpful to talk about mental illnesses and what could cause people to use drugs of certain type. Explanation and open discussion about anxiety, depression, boredom, and anger could be good talking tips for opening up conversation with the age group.
When communicating with people with intellectual disabilities, you need to know the limitations of the people that you are communicating with. The first step is to not assume that someone has an intellectual disability by the way that they speak. There are people with disabilities that talk slow, or have problems speaking, but intellectually they are as smart as anyone else. People that are disabled may have traits or fidgeting that help deal with their disability. When communicating with intellectual disabled people, knowing what they are able to understand and how they are able to communicate is the key to be able to address a topic of “Don’t do drugs” with them.
If they are limited in language, then I will need to tailor my communication and information to simple words that are easily understood. I would need to keep it simple and follow the rule that less is more for this type of audience. If they are of moderate intellectual intelligence then I could introduce more information and possible include them on the discussion on what their feelings are about drugs and using them. I believe that I would have to be clear on the types of drugs that I am communicating not to do, because they may have daily medications that I do not want to confuse them in considering that they should not take these drugs as well.
Communicating with different types of audiences is more about research and preparation. The communicator needs to know what type of audience they will have in order to be effective and getting a message across. Many people learn and listen in many different ways, therefore it is not likely to reach everyone with your message. Though, being concise, calm, and focused on the type of presentation that each audience will benefit from, one can successfully communicate with many types of people. Researching the type of audience that one will communicate with is key to delivering a meaningful and successful message.
Resources:
Lewis, J. (n.d.). Tips on Knowing Your Target Audience When Communicating Within an Organization. Retrieved September 14, 2016, from http://smallbusiness.chron.com/tips-knowing-target-audience-communicating-within-organization-36023.html.
Platt, W. (n.d.). Communicate with a Mentally Challenged Person. Retrieved September 14, 2016, from http://www.wikihow.com/Communicate-with-a-Mentally-Challenged-Person.
Talking to Your Child about Drugs. (n.d.). Retrieved September 14, 2016, from http://kidshealth.org/en/parents/talk-about-drugs.html.
Talking to Your Kids: Communicating the Risks. (n.d.). Retrieved September 14, 2016, from https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/marijuana-facts-parents-need-to-know/talking-to-your-kids-communicating-risks.
Respond to the bold paragraph ABOVE by using one of the option below… in APA format with At least one reference…..
Ask a probing question.
Share an insight from having read your colleague’s posting.
Offer and support an opinion.
Validate an idea with your own experience.
Make a suggestion.
Expand on your colleague’s posting.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!