MBA 530 Project on Adaptive Leadership
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
MBA 530 Project on Adaptive Leadership
Overview
You evaluated input from the employee engagement survey findings in Milestone One, comparing and contrasting the results with the Leadership Circle profile. In your capacity as a director in the business, you completed your individual Leadership Circle profile and produced a personal growth plan in Module Two, which you discussed with your manager, the vice president of leadership and learning. The depth of your assessment pleased the vice president, who sees potential in turning your technique into an adaptable leadership toolkit for use by all people leaders in the organization.
The vice president has requested you to create an adaptable leadership toolkit that will serve as a reference guide for the entire organization’s leadership development. After that, the vice president will share the toolbox you’ve created with the top human resources officer (CHRO).
Template for an Adaptive Leadership Toolkit in a Hurry
The Adaptive Leadership Toolkit Template is available for download. You’ll notice that the toolkit template looks a lot like the GROW model template.
Competencies for Leadership
Fill in the leadership toolkit template with your recommendations based on your Milestone One submission. Then fill in the blanks with the leadership skills you believe are most important for success.
Future State Desired, Current State, Gap Identified, Action Plan
Fill in the blanks in the template’s remaining columns: desired future state, existing status, identified gap, and action plan. Consider the behaviors that need to be addressed in underperforming areas mentioned in the employee engagement survey results as you do so.
Future State Aspiration: Define the required future positive rating for each survey question mentioned in your prior evaluation. Also provide a two- to three-sentence summary paragraph defining progress in this competency area.
Define the current positive rating for each survey question identified in your prior evaluation. Also, include a two- to three-sentence summary paragraph describing how you would characterize organizational leaders’ present behavior that resulted in a less-than-acceptable rating.
Gap Identified: Determine one to two possible reasons for the need to address leadership behaviors in order to improve overall organizational performance.
Identify one to two activities that will be taken to bridge the gap between the current condition and the intended future state in your action plan. When describing each action, use the SMART method.
Submission Instructions
You must submit the following to complete this milestone:Using the template supplied, create a comprehensive and prepared adaptive leadership toolkit that is ready to be rolled out to the entire organization.
An executive summary report, in the form of a 2- to 3-page Word document, for submission to the vice president; the summary report must include the following information:
A thesis statement that summarizes the paper’s main points
An overview of the adaptive leadership toolkit’s structure and a brief discussion of each section are provided in this introduction.
An explanation of the rationale for selecting the leadership behaviors listed in the toolkit, as well as how they connect to the findings of the employee engagement survey.
Recommendations for the next stages in distributing the adaptive leadership toolbox to all of the organization’s leaders
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!