Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Management 605 Forum Organizations and Leadership Paper
Management 605, Forum, Organizations, Leadership, Paper
Please Follow directions or I will dispute!
Please answer original forum with a minimum of 250 words and respond to both students separately with a minimum of 100 words each!
Page 1 Original Forum with References
page 2 Hector response with references
page 3 Julius response with references
Examine your organization and leadership through the following questions:
- How does your organization/leaders link rewards and appreciation to standards of excellence?
2. Are standards clear and how are they communicated? What changes would you recommend?
3. Is leadership defined by walking around (visible) and listening in your organization? How are examples and expectations set?
4. What does support look like/mean in your organization?
5. What recommendations do you have to improve the organizational dynamics?
Your initial post should demonstrate and integration of readings and research from the lessons to support your views. Support your work with references and intext citations.
I hope that everyone is having a great start to this week. The leadership in my organization developed different types of awards and recognition to increase organizational motivation. The prize and appreciation are separated into two categories, by individual and recruiting station performance. Individuals that go above and beyond on their monthly enlistment mission are recognized with Army awards and time off. When the recruiting station achieves its monthly mission, every recruiter receives a three-day weekend.
The standards and discipline are evident in the organization. There are regulations and standard operating procedures that all Soldiers and civilians must follow. Everyone in the organization acknowledges and understands how relevant are the standards. Regulations communicate the standards; there is no one to remind us of what not to do since we are all at least a Sergeant.
Examples and expectations set by the leadership in my organization are leading by example. Leadership is defined by the leadership actions to accomplish the mission and take care of their followers. An excellent example of a leadership style is the servant leader.
“Servant Leaders likely reflects the realization that employee development and success due to better performance is a way that organizations can effectively leverage investment in leadership development (Winston & Fields, 2015).”
Leadership support is critical in my organization. Leaders take their time to ensure that they provide the recruiters with the tools to be successful. The Battalion leadership spent money out of their pocket to buy masks and gloves for all of the Recruiters. Not every leader is willing to do that, and Soldiers can see this leadership actions.
My only recommendation for improving the organizational dynamics is by having more servant leaders that want to take care of the Soldiers. There are a few managers in my organization that are here only for them and not the Soldiers. The organization should invest more time training and developing those managers into leaders.
Reference:
Winston, B., & Fields, D. (2015). Seeking and measuring the essential behaviors of servant leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(4), 413-434. doi: http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy2.apus.edu/10.1108/LODJ-10-2013-0135
Kool, M., & Dirk, v. D. (2012). Servant leadership and commitment to change, the mediating role of justice and optimism. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 25(3), 422-433. doi: http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy2.apus.edu/10.1108/09534811211228139
Similar to our reading for the week, my unit employs a contingent reward. “To acknowledge the task-orientedness of leadership, the contingent reward element of transactional leadership is used. It is one of four major characteristics of transactional leadership ([5] Bass, 1990). It means that the leader promises rewards in exchange for good performance.
Contingent reward leaders offer tangible and intangible support to their followers, set rules, and determine the reward for goal accomplishment ([6] Bass, 1998; [57] Walumbwa et al., 2008)” We have multiple awards all at different levels, identifying the hard work that has been done by the individual.
The standards of excellence are well communicated across all working members from the highest ranking to the lowest. Our unit hold frequent meetings, Quarterly, Semi-Annually and annually to ensure that we stay task oriented and focused. As far as leadership presence, it is very lax due to the fact that most recruiters are geographically separated.
Though a mandatory office visit and phone calls are put in place to let it be known that top leadership is avail be regardless of the distance between one another. The ability for leadership to commute day in and day out is the direct example of showing that they care.
On top of leadership checking in, we utilize a wingman concept where we all have the responsibility to look after one another. In regards to trying to improve the organizational dynamics, I would refine how we get the new recruiters trained. The lack of trainers can be detrimental to an organization if they cannot train the incoming recruiters in time. I would implement, trainers in all section of the organization so that we won’t have to rely on a couple trainers driving all over the state to conduct a face-to-face training.
-Julius
Kool, M., & Dirk, v. D. (2012). Servant leadership and commitment to change, the mediating role of justice and optimism. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 25(3), 422-433.
http://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1014248220?accountid=8289
Video/YouTube links: Encourage the Heart – Death Crawl Illustration (click to view)
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!