M8D2 An Understanding of Archetypes
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Sources: 4
Subject: Other
Topic: M8D2: An Understanding of Archetypes
Paper details:Read: Required: Thury, Eva M., and Margaret Klopfle Devinney. Introduction to Mythology: Contemporary Approaches to Classical and World Myths. Fourth ed. New York: Oxford UP, 2017. “What Is Myth?” Chapter 1 in the text. Module Notes: Summarizing and Reflecting on Mythology Optional: Review your notes from Modules 1-7, as well as your graded assignments. View: Optional Review the films we have viewed in this course. Discuss: M8D1: A Change in Understanding Module 8: Module Notes: Summarizing and Reflecting on Mythology We have traveled through time, from Ancient Greece to the future, and we have traveled through various locations, from Mesopotamia to outer space, and many points in between. During our travels, we have met various archetypes, including the hero, the trickster, and the villain.
We have discovered some methods to analyze myths and met some of the great names in the study of mythology, including Otto Rank, Sigmund Freud, and Carl Jung. As we end our time together, we have the opportunity to reflect on what we have learned and summarize our ideas and the way these ideas have changed over the course of the last eight weeks. One of the first issues we discussed in Module 1 of this course was the definition of mythology. We discussed the academic study of myths, what we consider to be mythology, and we compared this to the use of urban myths and myths as falsehoods. We learned how myths morph as they travel from person to person, between cultures, and across time.
We discussed the connection between science and myth. We also met some of the most well-known characters in mythology – the heroes of the Trojan War and the gods and goddesses of Ancient Greece – and started our discussion of archetypes. You began, in Module 1, the process of placing characters into the archetype categories. During the course, we have worked on categorizing the well-known characters throughout classical and modern mythology. We studied the archetype of the hero, defining what makes a hero, and what differentiates this character from others. We learned about villains and tricksters and how their actions may be the same, but their motivations differ. We looked at the interactions between characters and how these lead to the development of heroic qualities in the hero.
We studied the Hero’s Journey and all of the elements of it as we traced our heroes’ paths from status quo, through the threshold, into the other world as they traveled on their roads of trials, and then back to the status quo. We developed our methods of analysis by practicing the techniques developed by Carl Jung, Otto Rank, and Sigmund Freud. We have watched several films and television episodes that have provided examples of archetypes and the Hero’s Journey. You have completed an Insight Research Paper, a Character Creation Project, 2 Reaction Papers, a Character Identification and Definition Quiz, as well as a challenging discussion in each module.
These tasks have required you to apply what you have learned. Now, we move on to our final discussions in this course, which ask you to reflect on what we have covered and summarize your findings. Looking back at the material we have covered and your analysis of it gives us an opportunity to reflect on our understanding of mythology and how this understanding may have changed during the last eight weeks. Review your notes and assignments from Modules 1-7. Discuss how your understanding of mythology has changed from Module 1 to Module 8. If you find that your understanding has not changed, discuss what you learned in the course that solidified your initial understanding of the concept of “myth.”
We have spent a great deal of time in this course learning about and analyzing the archetypes of the hero, the trickster, and the villain. During Modules 1-7, you have met and spent time with many different examples of each of these archetypes. Now, as we end our time together, we will look back at these specific examples and summarize what we have learned and reflect upon how this knowledge has contributed to our understanding of archetypes.
Reflect upon your learning on the course—in particular, the archetypes we have discussed. Applying your understanding from Modules 1-7, identify a character from television, film, or literature that you feel epitomizes the hero or villain, based on what you have learned in this course. It may not be one already encountered in this course.
Explain why you have chosen who you have, where s/he is found (as some may be unfamiliar with the movie, book, or television program), and how s/he fits the archetype of hero or villain, based on the criteria studied in this course.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!