Literary Analysis of The Magic Barrel
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Literary Analysis of The Magic Barrel
Phillips 1
Phillips 3
Terrell Phillips
Alex Kurian
ENGL 1302
28 June 2012
Literary Analysis of The Magic Barrel
In a career that took him from the Bureau of Census in Washington, DC in 1940, to the halls of Harvard University as a visiting lecturer, from 1966-68, Bernard Malamud proved that “…reinvention was the catalyst for his success as a writer” (Gitenstein). Malamud’s works include The Natural, The Fixer, and Two Fables, (Gitenstein). Malamud was “…born April 28, 1914, in Brooklyn, NY; died of natural causes, March 18, 1986, in New York, NY” (Understanding Bernard Malamud 2). In 1954 Malamud published what is considered one of his greatest short stories – The Magic Barrel (Gitenstein). The main theme of the story is that one must know his or her true identity to progress in life.
Leo Finkle, a rabbinical student, has decided at the age of 27 that he must find a wife. Finkle enlists the help of Pinye Salzman, a marriage broker and ends up with the Stella, the daughter of the marriage broker. There is nothing difficult about Bernard Malamud’s writing; he writes in clear, straightforward prose about universal ideas and emotions. The conflict that exists in this tale is finding the perfect bride for Finkle. The pace of the story was appropriate for the type of story Malamud was writing. If the story was rushed, you would not have believed the cautious nature of Leo Finkle, nor believe Salzman as calculating.
There are four central characters in this story; Leo Finkle- the rabbinical student who has assimilated to American life, Pinye Salzman-an elderly Jewish matchmaker, Lily Hirschorn- a potential wife for Leo, and Stella- the woman young Leo is certain that he loves (and the daughter of Salzman). Leo Finkle is a cautious, educated, young man with a long, severe scholar’s nose. He had brown eyes heavy with learning, sensitive yet ascetic lips, and a certain, almost hollow quality of the dark cheeks. Salzman is of slight build but dignified build, who wear an old hat, and an overcoat too short and tight for him. He was missing a few teeth and smelled like fish. However, he had an amiable manner that contrasted with horn rimmed mournful mild blue eyes that revealed a depth of sadness. His voice, lips, wisp of beard and bony fingers were all animated which surprisingly puts Leo at ease. Lily is a regular school teacher who drives a Dodge and once lived in Paris for a year. She is intelligent and cultured who is somewhere between the ages of 29-35 and widowed. Lily is petite and not unpretty, is wearing something signifying the approach of spring and surprisingly sound. Stella is Salzman’s disgraced daughter who is wearing a white dress and red shoes, appears at the end of the story smoking under a streetlight located on the corner. Salzman claims she is dead to him because she is wild like and animal. She is also the woman Leo has fallen in love with.
A stereotype in this story is that people, especially men, are most concerned with how their potential spouse looks like. That is why Leo asks Salzman right away if he has any pictures of the prospective brides. A break in stereotype is that a rabbi would never fall in love with a woman of Stella’s reputation. A rabbi is expected to marry someone of high moral character, who can be an example to his congregation. Stella would not be able to fulfill that role.
The setting for the story takes place in America in uptown New York during the winter and spring of the early 1950s. Leo Finkle lived in a small room crowded with books on the fourth floor of a graystone rooming house with a window that faced the street. Pinye Salzman lived on the third floor of an old tenement house less than a block from the subway station in the Bronx in New York. Salzman lives with his asthmatic, gray-haired wife. Their apartment like Leo’s is a one bedroom sunless and dingy room with old furniture that smelled of fish. Culture and religion appear in this story in the form of Leo and Stella. Leo cannot be a rabbi in the Jewish faith if he marries Stella, and Stella is the wayward daughter who (in the Jewish culture) would never be accepted in the community as anything other than a sinner and unclean. Leo also culturally represents the young generation of Jews who have assimilated into American culture and Salzman represents the old traditions of the Jewish faith, which is mired in the tradition that all Jews suffer.
The Magic Barrel had an external narration since no one in the story was telling the story to us. It allowed the reader to be an active observer to the events taking place. However, I prefer an internal narrator because there are times in a story that the narrator can express a feeling or mood that would not otherwise come across in the external narration. An external narrator can sometimes leave out important details that readers may be curious about.
This story is filled with images and symbols. Malamud begins the symbolisms with the title of the story. The Magic Barrel can be viewed the art of producing and illusion (Salzman) and the barrel symbolizes Leo being at the mercy of his circumstances being without a wife. Salzman’s daughter Stella is a myriad of symbols; Stella in her white dress and red shoes represents the saint and sinner within each of us. The street lamp she stands under against the dark of night illustrates the hope that is always available to us all. Finkle’s small room with the window represents the prison he has held himself in by not being loved and not allowing himself to be loved. Lily represents the experience and wisdom Leo has not yet attained. Salzman is the magician of the barrel; he provides the art of illusion that Finkle in his scholarly life would never permit. Even the fish in the story has many meanings. “In traditional Jewish religion, fish symbolizes being able to get married by the burning of fish liver to repel the jealousy demon” (Understanding Bernard Malamud 78). Fish is also represented in the New Testament in the Bible; fish represents Jesus in that he was a fisherman of men. “The Greek word Delphos means both fish and womb, which both offer life” (Understanding Bernard Malamud 78). This is why Leo noticed that the round white moon penetrated a cloud menagerie that resembled a huge hen and dropped out of her like an egg laying itself; he was thinking of life. The covers under which Leo hid himself was to cover the shame he will be bringing upon himself and his family in wanting to marry Stella.
The theme of the story is self-realization. In Leo Finkle’s quest to find a wife he realizes he suffers from a lack of love given and received. In Leo’s journey of self -revelation he becomes aware that his six years of study to become a rabbi has been less about his relationship with God and more about his journey to find love and acceptance of himself. Leo’s identity had been rooted in tradition; however, in his new awareness he wants to break free to form himself into the man he is and he does so with a definitive act of marrying Salzman’s daughter. In the same way, people today are often confused about who they are or what they should do. It is easy to simply conform to various expectations, without giving due importance to the things that make us unique as individuals. Malamud reminds us that in the final analysis, we are the ones living our life, and we will have to bear the consequences of our actions, good or bad.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!