LGBTQ Discussion Board Case Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
After reading and reviewing the material in the Reading & Study folder, reflect upon what you have learned and include pertinent aspects of the material in your response to the following:
Note any information that surprised you and describe 3 key themes that you will take away from this material in order to help you when addressing gender and sexual orientation in counseling. What are your thoughts about working with the LGBTQ+ population in general? What is one question you wanted to ask Dr. Garzon (presentation) or Dr. Yarhouse (video) and why?
Be sure to use Scripture and scholarly sources to support your argument. Cite your Bible reference and sources.
Textbook Readings
· Presentation: The Lesbian & Gay Population
· Presentation: Sexual Identity in Professional Counseling Practice
· Video: Who Knows Best – Transgender Kids (BBC Documentary)
· Article: A Different Stripe – Transgender Issues
· Website: An Inclusive Response to LGB and Conservative Religious Persons
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/articles/201803/different-stripe
https://itunes.apple.com/us/course/id1326939200
APA PsycNet Records
- Database: APA PsycArticles
Document Type: Journal ArticleCitation
Yarhouse, M. A., & Burkett, L. A. (2002). An inclusive response to LGB and conservative religious persons: The case of same-sex attraction and behavior. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33(3), 235–241. https://doi-org.ezproxy.liberty.edu/10.1037/0735-7028.33.3.235
Abstract
How should psychologists demonstrate respect for religion as an aspect of diversity when that aspect of diversity seems inconsistent with another form of diversity? This is a striking challenge when considering conservative expressions of religion in relation to a person’s experience of same-sex attraction and behavior. This article (a) asserts that conservative religion is a legitimate, though often overlooked, expression of diversity; (b) identifies ways in which gay-integrative theorists and conservative religious persons fail to appreciate each other’s perspective; and (c) presents a continuum of service delivery options to expand clinical services to persons who experience same-sex attraction. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
Unique Identifier
2002-01066-001
Title
An inclusive response to LGB and conservative religious persons: The case of same-sex attraction and behavior.
Special Section
Special Section: Responding to Sexual Orientation Issues.
Publication Date
Jun 2002
Publication History
- Accepted: Aug 8, 2001
- Revised: Mar 26, 2001
- First Submitted: Oct 2, 2000
Language
English
Author
Yarhouse, Mark A.; Burkett, Lori A.
Yarhouse, Mark A.markyar@regent.edu
Correspondence Address
Yarhouse, Mark A.: Regent U, School of Psychology & Counseling, CRB 215, 1000 Regent University Dr, Virginia Beach, VA, US, 23464, markyar@regent.edu
Affiliation
Yarhouse, Mark A.Regent U, Virginia Beach, VA, US
Burkett, Lori A.Regent U, Virginia Beach, VA, US
Source
Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, Vol 33(3), Jun 2002, 235-241.
NLM Title Abbreviation
Prof Psychol Res Pr
Special Section Title
Special Section: Responding to Sexual Orientation Issues.
ISSN
1939-1323 (Electronic); 0735-7028 (Print)
Other Serial Titles
Professional Psychology
Publisher
US: American Psychological Association
Format Covered
Publication Type
Journal; Peer Reviewed Journal
Document Type
Journal Article
Digital Object Identifier
https://doi-org.ezproxy.liberty.edu/10.1037/0735-7028.33.3.235
Keywords
psychologists; conservative religion; same-sex attraction & behavior; diversity; gay-integrative theorists; treatment; service delivery
Index Terms
* Conservatism; * Health Care Delivery; * Homosexuality; * Religion; * Multiculturalism; Homosexuality (Attitudes Toward); Psychologists; Religious Beliefs; Religious Practices; Treatment
PsycInfo Classification
3400 Professional Psychological & Health Personnel Issues; 3300 Health & Mental Health Treatment & Prevention
Population Group
Human
Copyright
- Holder: American Psychological Association
- Year: 2002
Conference
Annual convention of the American Psychological Association, 108, Aug, 2000, Washington, DC, US; Portions of this article were presented as part of a symposium entitled , which was presented at the aforementioned conference.
Release Date
20020522 (APA PsycInfo); 20060710 (APA PsycArticles)
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!