Levels of Processing in Working Memory Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Levels of Processing in Working Memory Assignment
Assignment Overview Two journal articles have been uploaded to Moodle. Rose, N. S., Craik, F. I., & Buchsbaum, B. R. (2015). Levels of processing in working memory: Differential involvement of frontotemporal networks. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 27(3), 522-532.
Whalley, M. G., Rugg, M. D., & Brewin, C. R. (2012). Autobiographical memory in depression: an fMRI study. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 201(2), 98-106. Choose one journal article (either the Rose et al. (2015) paper or the Whalley et al. (2012) paper) to complete your assignment.
The goal of this assignment is for you to get experience reading a peer-reviewed journal article related to cognitive psychology. The assignment involves reflecting on what was discussed in the journal article, and going beyond what is presented in the article by making connections with concepts discussed in the course. There are four key components that need to be discussed in your assignment:
1) Reflection
2) Connection to theory
3) Limitations
4) Study design Assignment Instructions In paragraph format, address each of the four components in your assignment. You will be graded on the quality of your writing and communication as well as the content of your write-up. You only have two pages double-spaced to discuss your ideas, so be concise (avoid flowery language)! The four components are described in more detail below:
1) Reflection · What are your personal thoughts about this article? · Does the article relate to your personal life or anything that you have read in the media or previous courses? · What questions does this study raise in your mind? · How do the article findings relate to concepts we discussed in class and/or in the textbook?
2) Connection to theory · Explain the study findings from the journal article in relation to a theory relevant to cognitive psychology. · How can the study findings be explained within the context of the theoretical framework? · Do the study findings provide support for the theory or challenge it? · This can be a theory discussed in class and/or the textbook or you research a theory not discussed in class/textbook (as long as it is a theory relevant to cognitive psychology). · Please cite the theory (e.g., if I am discussing The Working Memory Model, I would cite (Baddeley and Hitch, 1974)).
3) Limitations · Identify and explain a limitation not mentioned in the study · Do not choose a generic or vague limitation that can be applied to most research studies (e.g., small sample size; participant dropout rate). The limitation should be unique to the journal article. · How could future research address this limitation?
4) Study design · Design a follow-up study to the study presented in the journal article · What is the research question you set out to answer in your follow-up study? · I realize you are limited in space, so this task will involve a brief summary of your study methods (the task used – what the participants will be asked to do) and a brief description of your anticipated results Assignment Details ·
Please submit your assignments by uploading your file to Moodle · Put your name and student number in the header of the document · Deadline: Friday March 29th (11:59pm). Any assignments submitted after 11:59pm on Friday March 29th will receive a 5% deduction per day. ·
Format: 2 pages double-spaced (1-inch margins, 12-point Times New Roman font) · Marks will be docked for exceeding the page limit (5% per half page). · This assignment is worth 10% of your final grade in the course. · The originality of your assignment will be confirmed using Turnitin · Do not use any direct quotations.
Everything must be put into your own words. · This assignment is a reflection paper, so there should not be overlap between your responses and those presented in the journal article. ·
Check the assignment marking scheme to get a better idea regarding how the marks are distributed Psychology 2260N Journal Article Assignment: Marking Scheme Writing Style Overall clarity, continuity, cohesion Grammar, spelling, sentence construction /10 Reflection Personal thoughts expressed in a clear and concise manner Relation of article to personal life, media, and/or previous course State questions raised in response to reading the article
Discuss how study findings relate to concepts we discussed in class/text /10 Connection to Theory Appropriate theory chosen (relevant to cognition and journal article) Explain the study findings in the context of the theoretical framework
Explain whether findings support or challenge the theory Identify well-thought-out links between components of theory & findings /10 Limitations Identified and explained a limitation not mentioned in the journal article Limitation is unique and specific to the study (not vague and generic) Described how future research could address this limitation /10 Study Design Statement of research question Research question is specific and relevant to the article Designed a follow-up study to the research presented in the article The follow-up study makes sense and is well-thought-out Summary of study methods (e.g., task, stimuli, instructions) Statement of anticipated results /10 Final Assignment Grade /50
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!