Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
SUBJECTIVE
Lauren is a 17‐year‐old female who presents alone to the primary care office to discuss birth control options. She has been in a relationship with her boyfriend for 6 months and is currently sexually active with only him. She has a history of 1 partner prior to her current boyfriend. She reports using condoms always and never having unprotected intercourse. She has not discussed this with her mother yet, but does think she could be open about it. She has not had testing in the past for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), but would be interested and denies symptoms such as abnormal vaginal discharge, dysuria, pelvic pain, or any new rashes or lesions. She is due for her menses in 3 days. She generally has cramps the day before and the first day of her menses, and takes ibuprofen with good effect.
Past medical history: Lauren has a history of eczema and seasonal allergies.
Family history: Lauren’s biological mother has a history of dysmenorrhea.
Social history: Lauren lives at home with her mother, father, and younger brother. She is in the 12th grade and plays tennis for fun. She reports having many good friends and denies sub-stance use.
Medications: Lauren’s medications include cetirizine (Zyrtec) 10 mg daily during allergy season and occasional triamcinolone cream for her eczema.
Allergies: NKDA.
OBJECTIVE
General: Well appearing, no acute distress
Vital signs: Weight: 145 lbs; height: 62 inches; BMI: 26.5; HR: 72; B/P: 116/74.
Cardiovascular: Regular rate and rhythm. S1/S2 normal.
Respiratory: Lungs clear to auscultation bilaterally.
Breast: Tanner V breast development noted. Not palpated at time of visit; at last annual physical exam had normal breast exam with no masses.Gastrointestinal: Bowel sounds normoactive in all four quadrants. Soft, nontender, nondistended, with no hepatosplenomegaly.
Genitourinary: External exam with Tanner V pubic hair development noted and no lesions present.
CRITICAL THINKING
Given the information provided, what other questions would you ask?
What diagnostic or screening tests would you consider running on this patient?
___Urine pregnancy test
___Beta pregnancy test (serum hCG level)
___Urine gonorrhea and chlamydia (GC/CT)
___Serum HIV immunoassay and RT‐PCR (viral load)
___Serum RPR (reactive plasma reagin) or VDRL (Venereal Disease Research laboratory) testing for syphilis___Pelvic exam with wet mount
___Pap smear
___Complete blood count (CBC)
___Lipid panel (baseline cholesterol screening)
What are the concerns at this point?
What is the diagnosis at this point?
What types of contraceptives should be considered for Lauren?
How would each contraceptive option be initiated?
What are some common contraindications to contraceptives?
How should Lauren be counseled about side effects?
What are the plans for referral and follow‐up care?
What other education should Lauren be provided with related to reproductive health?
If the patient chooses not to discuss her choice to seek out birth control options with her mother, how would you proceed?
Are there any standardized guidelines that should be used to treat this case? If so, what are they?
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!