Internship Alternative Application Paper Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Paper details:
Those opting for the alternative assignment, instead of the 160 hours of internship) must complete all three sections: Alternative assignment 1–Interview Project: You must identify a command staff/supervisor, a veteran staff, and a relatively new (2 or fewer years) profession. Please choose a careeryou are interested in and do your research on various agencies. Please write about your search. Next, pick an agency that you have a liking for based on your career interest. Explain what attracted you to the agency. Design questions that are appropriate for the various ranks, as identified above. Make
sure you list these questions accordingly. Ask the questions and record their responses. Make room for any follow-up questions. Repeat this process for all three interviews. Write your Paper with their responses. Share your perspectives towards the end. What did you learn about their work, the profession, and what drew them to the job?
What has kept them coming to work? What kind of advice do they have for anyone seeking to go into that line of work? This project will take some time and preparation. Remember, you will have opportunities to meet people and make an impression, so be prepared to leave a positive impression.
Alternative assignment 2– Interview General Public, 3 to 5 people: Many of our career choices may be viewed differently by the general public. After researching and conducting interviews with career professionals, you will turn your attention to the general public. Before you reach out to the general
public, do some research about public perceptions of your career choice. You are encouraged to look at one or two research journals and available surveys conducted by the establishment like the pew survey center, social media, popular journals. You can find popular news journals and career-
centered journals publishing articles about the career. Read the pros and cons of the profession and the positive and negative perceptions about the trade broadly.
Describe all that you found in your Paper. Using what you have found in your broad readings, develop questions to ask the general public. Reach a broad range of people so that you will receive a well-rounded understanding of the perceptions people have about your career choice. Make sure you list the questions and people’s responses. Reach out beyond your comfort zonethose who love and support the profession and those who question the work. Be patient and gentle as you listen and learn. As you write the Paper, capture all that you could find through the articles, surveys, popular journal
articles, and what the general public thinks and feel about the profession. Alternative assignment 3– Staying Healthy: You are required to identify three to five strategies to stay healthy in one’s chosen profession.
Read extensively about staying healthy emotionally, physically, spiritually, and mentally. You are required to reference journal articles, popular journals, and books that promote staying healthy and caring for oneself. The Paper should be between 5 to 6 pages long. Your research about healthy living
while being employed should be applicable, and You should be able to talk about it and present it to your future employer. I want you to be creative and enthusiastic about what you are learning and sharing. Please make sure you write it like a mini research paper. Summative Paper (all students are
expected to complete the summative Paper): I was hoping you could take this opportunity to share with me, the department, and the university at large about your journey. What did you listen to and learn during this journey towards your graduation?
How did you determine your career path? What classes and experiences helped you and shaped your perspectives? How would you describe the totality of your journey? Next, explore how you will respond to interview questions. Talk to your supervisors and colleagues in the field. What questions
were they asked, or what problems are often asked of candidates seeking a position with agencies you are interested in working with? Write out the questions as comprehensively as you can. Next, share your thoughts on how you would respond to the questions. You must know the agency and its
mission and values. Your responses must reflect care for the agency, its community, and its political position. Be thoughtful and practice to be prepared.
Supervisor Evaluation ( if you are completing an alternative assignment, you have to evaluate your work as well) You met with your supervisor and drafted your learning Contract. Now that you are done with your minimum of 160 hours, please meet with your supervisor again. Discuss with your
supervisor, what you have learned, your progress, and ask for feedback. Make sure your supervisor is capturing the content of the conversation. Your gathering with the supervisor will help them to write a comprehensive evaluation of your performance with the agency. When the supervisor completes
their assessment on agency letterhead, you must upload that document to Dropbox. Along with your agency’s performance, please make sure we have the number of hours you have completed with the agency, contact information for your supervisor, and any other relevant information.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!