Impact on Student Learning Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Abstract
Write this section last. Here you write a short summary of your findings and conclusions.Introduction and Context
Describe the nature and purpose of the TCISL assignment for the reader. Introduce the unit of work that you taught, and the reasons why you selected that unit. Describe the area of intervention that you focused on (e.g. Spelling), and explain its importance for the subject, the level, and the students that you taught.
The Context
1. Describe the contextual factors specific to your school, and discuss how these factors affect teaching and learning. (e.g. type of school, curriculum, resources including technology, and details about the student population that seem relevant, such as language, gender, achievement, and sociocultural factors.)
2. Describe the intended learning outcome/s you focused on in this unit of work, and explain why you chose those particular outcomes.
Pre-Assessment
1. Describe the pre-assessment strategies you used, and why you selected those particular assessment tools.
2. Analyze the performance of children in the pre-assessment, using a table, graph or chart. Do not use the actual names of the children or the school – create fictitious names.
The Instructional Unit
1. Describe your unit of work in detail here.
2. Explain how you designed specific learning experiences/activities to address the intended learning outcomes, and reflecting a variety of instructional strategies/techniques.
3. Explain how the activity/ies stemmed from your pre-assessment information, and how they clearly address the identified learning needs of the students.
4. Describe any resources you sourced and/or created to support your teaching of the unit, including technology.
5. Describe the types of differentiation that you implemented when teaching your unit.
6. Describe any classroom management techniques that you introduced in order to implement the activities successfully.
7. Describe any formative/informal assessment that you conducted while teaching (e.g. monitoring and providing guidance and feedback as you walked around the classroom.)
8. Describe the post-teaching assessment tools you implemented, and why you chose those tools.Post-Assessment
1. Analyze the performance of children in the post-assessment, using a table, graph or chart. Do not use the actual names of the children or the school – create fictitious names.
2. Describe the differences you found in learning/proficiency between the pre-and post-test results.Discussion
• What concepts did you, the teacher, have to understand in order to teach this unit well?
• To what extent did children understand the procedures and concepts prior to the start of the lesson?
• Were the challenges to the children’s understanding of concepts taught? Explain.
• What went well? What did you observe as being most supportive of their development of concepts and/or procedures [e.g. teacher actions, use of tools, aspects of the task itself]?
• How well did they learn the concepts you taught?
• What were the gaps in their learning?
• Describe any impact on learning that you or your mentor or supervisor or peer observed due to your classroom management strategies.
• Describe any feedback you received on the effectiveness of the teaching resources you used.
• What factors explain the post-teaching test results?,
Conclusions
• What did you learn about your teaching of this unit, from the assessment results?
• What are your strengths and areas for improvement as a teacher, according to the results?
• What did you learn about your teaching of this unit, from the feedback you received from your mentor and/or supervisor and/or peer?
• What might you do differently if you had to teach this unit again?
• How would you build further on the knowledge acquired by students in this unit?
• What advice, if any, would you give to a) teachers and b) parents as a result of the outcomes of this project?I will describe it more with the writer.
( what I have done already ) :
I do a pre-assessment with the child I sow that the child has some problems with addition and subtraction. the child name is Thyab he is 6 years old, Kg2, and has problems with math.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!