Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Historical Figures as Agents of Change
Change and health care are closely interlocked. Health care organizations are progressively encountered with the desire to adopt change. Whether it is advancement in medical care, technology, increasing demand for care delivery, a patient population that is gradually active and involved in their health and wellbeing or changing reimbursement and cost models. By acknowledging that change is unavoidable in the healthcare field, organizations have been concentrating on attaining effective change management, entailing change agents’ utilization to ease the shift and wok to facilitate positive change. In the past decade, healthcare has had unique individuals who promoted growth that humanity has benefited from their actions. Some of these historical figures are Edwin Chadwicks and Edward Jenner. Edwin Chadwick was the central actor in the sanitary movement in the turbulent 1840s, and Edward Jenner discovered the vaccine effective against smallpox. This essay aims to examine each of these historic agent change’s contributions and analyze the challenges they encountered.
Comparison of Innovative, health-related activities by Chadwick and Edward Jenner
Sram, and Ashton (1998), Pointed out that in the 1840s, Chadwick had a crucial role in the sanitary movement. Chadwick report published in 1842 on the Sanitary Conditions of the Labouring Population of Great Britain, emphasizes that immorality is the crucial cause of desolation and pauperism and not poverty and capitalism as society viewed. The 1848 Public healthcare Act used Chadwick report as a guideline.
However, Jenner became a hero for developing the smallpox vaccine that stopped the pandemic and saved many individuals’ lives. Before Jenner developed the smallpox vaccine, many people had died from the plague. Thus, Edward’s move was a significant advancement in healthcare. An earlier doctor used to inject people will determine a small quantity of smallpox disease to build a patient’s resistance to the disease (Chung, & Liu, 2017). Jenner vaccination was effective and safer to curb the spreads of smallpox
Challenges the Historical Agent of Change Faced
Chadwick’s Report faced Criticism
The first final Report that Chadwick produced was essential to the old Poor Law system, and it suggested vital changes. However, despite his Report giving a recommendation, the new Poor Law Amendment policy did not take the path that Chadwick assumed. Nonetheless, it established a Central Poor Law Commission, which he felt would reinforce the new changes. Chadwick’s Report faced essential criticism of Poor Law was left to be structured as the local level, and it had no dominant supremacy over the entire system. Chadwick was one of the three persons on the Poor Law Commission during the 1834 law amendment process, Chadwick was only appointed secretary (Hamlin, 1998). Having been given lesser influence in the Poor-law’s revision did not stop him from pushing the Law to assume his way since Chadwick utilized his position as secretary to recommend further how to better the Law.
Financial Constrains
According to Hamlin (1998), one challenge he faced was the Report on typhoid epidemics that hit significant cities in England in 1837 and 1838. The Report claimed that there was pressing need to enhance the poor’s living conditions and that lacked public health was linked to the lifestyles lived by the marginalized. The Report further suggest that the improved health of the marginalized people would benefit the country directly as a whole (Hamlin, 1998). These changes recommended by the Report was costly and made Chadwick collided with several influential individuals who did not want to contribute money to assist the marginalized. Besides, the Conservative government of 1848 dismissed the Report. Chadwick was patient and kept on holding on the Report until when the Liberal government comes into power; hence, the Public Health Act was implemented in 1848.
Challenge of Lack of Advanced Equipment by Jenner
Unlike Chadwick, Edward Jenner did not face any opposition and critics. The only problem he faced was the inability to produce evidence that would back up his experiments to show his vaccine was effective against smallpox. Another challenge he faced is a lack of advanced equipment to work with. By then, technology had not advanced in the field of health, and most of the things were done manually
Importance of the Activities for Positive Social Change
Chadwick’s Report was economic. It argued that if the health of the marginalized people was enhanced, it would reduce the number of people seeking low relief; much poor relief was offered to the household of men who died from infectious diseases (Eyler, 1976). Therefore, cash spent on enhancing public health was cost-effective as it would be cheap in the long run.
His effort led to the most significant steps to enhance the public’s health by providing clean drinking water, improved drainage, and waste materials from the streets.
Whereas, the vaccine he developed formed the basis of modern immunology and motivated other scientists to create different vaccines to protect people from other pandemic diseases
How Jenner Achievements relates to my Personality
To obtain the vaccine against the disease, Jenner worked tiredly and dedicated his time to his experiments. According to Mellanby (1949), he desired to transform the world for the better of others. Therefore, Jenner was a selfless person. Like him, one of my personality traits is that I hope to see others doing good. I always put other people’s feelings before my own and I will continue to serve as a selfless person.
Incorporating Public Health Values and Philosophies as scholar-Practitioner
Public health is a practical and applied field. Mellers and Tetlock, 2019 asserted that public health work is solution-centered. The field values evidence-based decision making to support their action. As a scholar-practitioner, I will produce high-quality journal articles that can be used by public health policy creates to enable them to make a decision based on reliable and trustworthy information.
References
Chung, K. T., & Liu, J. K. (2017). Pioneers in Microbiology: The Human Side of Science. World Scientific. https://books.google.co.ke/books?hl=en&lr=&id=GxM0DwAAQBAJ&oi
Eyler, J. M. (1976). Mortality statistics and Victorian health policy: program and criticism. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 50(3), 335-35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44451278
Hamlin, C. (1998). Public health and social justice in the age of Chadwick: Britain, 1800-1854. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.co.ke/books?hl=en&lr=&id=fwCPy5V3cOc
Mellanby, E. (1949). Jenner and his impact on medical science. British medical journal, 1(4612), 921. https://www.bmj.com/content/1/4612/921
Mellers, B.A., and Tetlock, P.E., 2019. From discipline-centered rivalries to solution-centered science: Producing better probability estimates for policymakers. American Psychologist, 74(3), p.290. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000429
Sram, I., & Ashton, J. (1998). Millennium report to Sir Edwin Chadwick. BMJ, 317(7158), 592-596. ttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7158.592
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!